Meta-Analysis of the Effect of the Escape Room Teaching Method on Nursing Education

Xing Yang, Yuying Hao, Shanhong Fan, Lina Zhang, Rui Song, Jie Liu, Mei-juan Bian
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of the Effect of the Escape Room Teaching Method on Nursing Education","authors":"Xing Yang, Yuying Hao, Shanhong Fan, Lina Zhang, Rui Song, Jie Liu, Mei-juan Bian","doi":"10.26689/jcnr.v7i4.4172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the effect of the escape room teaching method on nursing education. Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases, with a search time frame from the first day of database establishment to October 2022. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the obtained literature and extracted the data. The RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 7 studies involving 1487 nursing students were included. Compared with the control group, the escape room teaching method improved the professional performance of nursing students [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.38,1.59), P < 0.0001]. The critical thinking ability of nursing students was enhanced [mean difference (MD) = 12.64, 95% CI (7.91,17.37), P < 0.0001], and the investment level of nursing students in learning was improved [MD = 4.18, 95% CI (1.74,6.62), P < 0.0001]. Conclusion: The escape room teaching method can improve nursing students’ professional performance, critical thinking ability, and learning engagement level. There is no significant difference in the impact of nursing teaching satisfaction, and there is still a lack of data support. This paper is limited by the quality and quantity of included literature, and more high-quality studies are still needed to further demonstrate the above conclusions.","PeriodicalId":64151,"journal":{"name":"临床护理研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床护理研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v7i4.4172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the effect of the escape room teaching method on nursing education. Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases, with a search time frame from the first day of database establishment to October 2022. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the obtained literature and extracted the data. The RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 7 studies involving 1487 nursing students were included. Compared with the control group, the escape room teaching method improved the professional performance of nursing students [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.38,1.59), P < 0.0001]. The critical thinking ability of nursing students was enhanced [mean difference (MD) = 12.64, 95% CI (7.91,17.37), P < 0.0001], and the investment level of nursing students in learning was improved [MD = 4.18, 95% CI (1.74,6.62), P < 0.0001]. Conclusion: The escape room teaching method can improve nursing students’ professional performance, critical thinking ability, and learning engagement level. There is no significant difference in the impact of nursing teaching satisfaction, and there is still a lack of data support. This paper is limited by the quality and quantity of included literature, and more high-quality studies are still needed to further demonstrate the above conclusions.
逃生室教学法对护理教育效果的meta分析
目的:采用荟萃分析方法,系统评价逃生室教学法在护理教育中的效果。方法:检索PubMed、Medline、Web of Science、CNKI、VIP和万方数据库,检索时间为数据库建立第一天至2022年10月。两名研究人员评估了获得的文献的质量,并提取了数据。采用RevMan5.4软件进行荟萃分析。结果:共纳入7项研究,涉及1487名护生。与对照组相比,逃生室教学法提高了护生的专业表现[标准化平均差(SMD)=0.98,95%置信区间(CI;0.38,1.59),P<0.001]。护生的批判性思维能力增强[平均差(MD)=12.64,95%CI(7.91,17.37),P<0.0001],并提高了护生的学习投入水平[MD=4.18,95%CI(1.74,6.62),P<0.0001]。结论:逃生室教学法能提高护生的专业表现、批判性思维能力和学习参与水平。对护理教学满意度的影响没有显著差异,仍缺乏数据支持。本文受限于收录文献的质量和数量,还需要更多高质量的研究来进一步论证上述结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信