Tangling and Untangling the Trollopes: A Stylometric Analysis of Frances Milton Trollope, Frances Eleanor Trollope, Anthony Trollope, Thomas Adolphus Trollope, and Charles Dickens

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Leah Henrickson, Eleanor Dumbill
{"title":"Tangling and Untangling the Trollopes: A Stylometric Analysis of Frances Milton Trollope, Frances Eleanor Trollope, Anthony Trollope, Thomas Adolphus Trollope, and Charles Dickens","authors":"Leah Henrickson, Eleanor Dumbill","doi":"10.1353/vcr.2021.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper uses stylometry—computational analysis of writing style—to explore how the Trollope family's personal and professional interactions with one another may have influenced their writing styles. In particular, works by Frances Milton, Frances Eleanor, Thomas Adolphus, and Anthony (referred to collectively as \"the authorial Trollopes\"), as well as some works by Charles Dickens, constitute the corpus. Dickens, initially used as a control in the analysis, in actuality emerged either as a potential influence on the authorial Trollopes given his stringent editorial practices, or as being influenced by the Trollopes himself. Working from the underlying assumption that authorial writing style reflects individuality and may change in accordance with interpersonal relationships as well as writerly expectations of genre, this paper shows that the authorial Trollopes' writing styles, while still distinct, are at times remarkably similar to one another. In doing so, this paper highlights the literary and historical value of those less-renowned Trollopes, supporting more extensive study of family members other than Anthony. More broadly, this paper is a concept study to demonstrate the value of stylometry to Victorianists studying textual networks.The software used to conduct this research was the R package \"stylo.\"","PeriodicalId":40377,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Review-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Victorian Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"243 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Review-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Victorian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vcr.2021.0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:This paper uses stylometry—computational analysis of writing style—to explore how the Trollope family's personal and professional interactions with one another may have influenced their writing styles. In particular, works by Frances Milton, Frances Eleanor, Thomas Adolphus, and Anthony (referred to collectively as "the authorial Trollopes"), as well as some works by Charles Dickens, constitute the corpus. Dickens, initially used as a control in the analysis, in actuality emerged either as a potential influence on the authorial Trollopes given his stringent editorial practices, or as being influenced by the Trollopes himself. Working from the underlying assumption that authorial writing style reflects individuality and may change in accordance with interpersonal relationships as well as writerly expectations of genre, this paper shows that the authorial Trollopes' writing styles, while still distinct, are at times remarkably similar to one another. In doing so, this paper highlights the literary and historical value of those less-renowned Trollopes, supporting more extensive study of family members other than Anthony. More broadly, this paper is a concept study to demonstrate the value of stylometry to Victorianists studying textual networks.The software used to conduct this research was the R package "stylo."
缠结与解开特罗洛普:弗朗西丝·米尔顿·特罗洛普、弗朗西丝·埃莉诺·特罗洛普、安东尼·特罗洛普、托马斯·阿道夫斯·特罗洛普和查尔斯·狄更斯的文体分析
摘要:本文运用文体学——写作风格的计算分析——来探讨特罗洛普家族彼此之间的个人和职业互动如何影响他们的写作风格。特别是弗朗西丝·弥尔顿、弗朗西丝·埃莉诺、托马斯·阿道夫斯和安东尼(统称为“作家特罗洛普”)的作品,以及查尔斯·狄更斯的一些作品,构成了语料库。狄更斯最初在分析中被用作对照,实际上,由于他严格的编辑实践,他要么是对特罗洛普作家的潜在影响,要么是受到特罗洛普本人的影响。作者的写作风格反映了个性,并可能随着人际关系和作家对体裁的期望而变化。本文从这一基本假设出发,表明作家特罗洛普的写作风格虽然仍然不同,但有时彼此之间却非常相似。通过这样做,本文突出了那些不太出名的特罗洛普的文学和历史价值,支持了对安东尼以外的家庭成员进行更广泛的研究。更广泛地说,本文是一个概念研究,以证明文体学对维多利亚时代研究文本网络的价值。用于进行这项研究的软件是R软件包“stylo”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书