A biocultural study of nasal fracture, violence, and gender using 19th–20th century skeletal remains from Portugal

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Bruno M. Magalhães, Simon Mays, Sarah Stark, Ana Luísa Santos
{"title":"A biocultural study of nasal fracture, violence, and gender using 19th–20th century skeletal remains from Portugal","authors":"Bruno M. Magalhães,&nbsp;Simon Mays,&nbsp;Sarah Stark,&nbsp;Ana Luísa Santos","doi":"10.1002/oa.3233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nasal fracture is usually described as the most common type of fracture of the facial bones, either alone or associated with other fractures. This work aims to study the nasal fracture among Portuguese individuals from the 19th and 20th centuries. The focus is on patterning in trauma in relation to gender and in the attempt to distinguish violent from accidental injury. The sample comprises 2023 (52.6% males, 47.4% females) individuals from three Portuguese identified skeletal collections who were born between 1804 and 1951 and died between 1895 and 1969. Age at death ranges between 1 and 109 years old. Nasal and other facial fractures were studied, and violent versus accidental trauma were distinguished following Magalhães et al. (2020). Nasal fracture was more frequent in males (10.4%, 101/969) than in females (5.9%, 47/800). This was true both for fracture inferred due to violence (laterally deviated fracture) and due to accident. Sixty-one point five percent (91/148) of the individuals show a lateral impact force deviation. Comminutions correspond to 18.4% (26/141) of the total, and 12.8% (19/148) have other facial fractures. There is no association between nasal fracture and risk of death for both sexes, but the males seem to show a higher tendency for nasal fracture earlier in life than the females. The differences of nasal fracture between sexes are in accordance with the historical data showing that men had more social and cultural opportunities to engage in violent encounters. Although the percentage in women is lower, the majority of laterally deviated noses and isolated, non-comminuted nasal fractures in both sexes show that interpersonal violence may have played an important role in the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":14179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","volume":"33 5","pages":"858-867"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nasal fracture is usually described as the most common type of fracture of the facial bones, either alone or associated with other fractures. This work aims to study the nasal fracture among Portuguese individuals from the 19th and 20th centuries. The focus is on patterning in trauma in relation to gender and in the attempt to distinguish violent from accidental injury. The sample comprises 2023 (52.6% males, 47.4% females) individuals from three Portuguese identified skeletal collections who were born between 1804 and 1951 and died between 1895 and 1969. Age at death ranges between 1 and 109 years old. Nasal and other facial fractures were studied, and violent versus accidental trauma were distinguished following Magalhães et al. (2020). Nasal fracture was more frequent in males (10.4%, 101/969) than in females (5.9%, 47/800). This was true both for fracture inferred due to violence (laterally deviated fracture) and due to accident. Sixty-one point five percent (91/148) of the individuals show a lateral impact force deviation. Comminutions correspond to 18.4% (26/141) of the total, and 12.8% (19/148) have other facial fractures. There is no association between nasal fracture and risk of death for both sexes, but the males seem to show a higher tendency for nasal fracture earlier in life than the females. The differences of nasal fracture between sexes are in accordance with the historical data showing that men had more social and cultural opportunities to engage in violent encounters. Although the percentage in women is lower, the majority of laterally deviated noses and isolated, non-comminuted nasal fractures in both sexes show that interpersonal violence may have played an important role in the results.

使用19 - 20世纪葡萄牙骨骼遗骸对鼻骨折、暴力和性别进行生物培养研究
鼻骨折通常被描述为最常见的面骨骨折类型,可单独发生或合并其他骨折。这项工作旨在研究19世纪和20世纪葡萄牙人的鼻骨折。重点是与性别有关的创伤模式,并试图区分暴力伤害和意外伤害。该样本包括2023人(52.6%为男性,47.4%为女性),来自三个葡萄牙鉴定的骨骼收藏,他们出生于1804年至1951年,死于1895年至1969年。死亡年龄在1至109岁之间。研究了鼻腔和其他面部骨折,并根据magalh等人(2020)区分了暴力创伤和意外创伤。男性鼻骨折发生率(10.4%,101/969)高于女性(5.9%,47/800)。由于暴力(侧偏骨折)和事故导致的骨折都是如此。65.5%(91/148)的个体表现出侧向冲击力偏差。粉碎性骨折占总数的18.4%(26/141),12.8%(19/148)伴有其他面部骨折。对于两性来说,鼻骨折与死亡风险之间没有关联,但男性似乎在生命早期比女性表现出更高的鼻骨折倾向。鼻骨折的性别差异与历史数据一致,表明男性有更多的社会和文化机会参与暴力冲突。尽管女性的比例较低,但男性和女性的大多数侧偏鼻和孤立的、非粉碎性鼻骨折表明,人际暴力可能在结果中发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology is to provide a forum for the publication of papers dealing with all aspects of the study of human and animal bones from archaeological contexts. The journal will publish original papers dealing with human or animal bone research from any area of the world. It will also publish short papers which give important preliminary observations from work in progress and it will publish book reviews. All papers will be subject to peer review. The journal will be aimed principally towards all those with a professional interest in the study of human and animal bones. This includes archaeologists, anthropologists, human and animal bone specialists, palaeopathologists and medical historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信