Reporting Public Multicriteria Decision-Making Applications:

Q4 Decision Sciences

International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.13033/ijahp.v14i2.1025

Enrique Mu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following reflections refer to the development and reporting of public decision-making studies. These observations are provided with the hope of improving the quality and validity of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) studies in the public sector. While my thoughts here are not intended to be a comprehensive study of how to report public MCDM studies, my intention is to highlight some key elements that are often not properly addressed by researchers. These observations are particularly relevant for AHP/ANP applications due to their widespread use in public decision-making.

查看原文本刊更多论文

报告公共多准则决策应用程序：

以下是关于公共决策研究的发展和报告的思考。提供这些观察结果是希望提高公共部门多标准决策研究的质量和有效性。虽然我在这里的想法并不是要对如何报告公共MCDM研究进行全面的研究，但我的意图是强调研究人员经常没有适当解决的一些关键因素。由于AHP/ANP在公共决策中的广泛应用，这些观察结果与AHP/ANP应用特别相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： IJAHP is a scholarly journal that publishes papers about research and applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Analytic Network Process(ANP), theories of measurement that can handle tangibles and intangibles; these methods are often applied in multicriteria decision making, prioritization, ranking and resource allocation, especially when groups of people are involved. The journal encourages research papers in both theory and applications. Empirical investigations, comparisons and exemplary real-world applications in diverse areas are particularly welcome.