PAST TENSE FORMS OF THE VERB ’BE’ IN MODAL CONSTRUCTIONS IN UDMURT

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Kubitsch
{"title":"PAST TENSE FORMS OF THE VERB ’BE’ IN MODAL CONSTRUCTIONS IN UDMURT","authors":"R. Kubitsch","doi":"10.35634/2224-9443-2021-15-4-599-618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Udmurt the past tense forms of the verb ’be’ ( val and vylem ) appear in different modal constructions and in the non-declarative moods. The paper focuses on the use of val and vylem in four modal constructions: two deontic, a desiderative and a permissive one. It is established that in such constructions val and vylem can have non-modal and modal use as well. In their non-modal sense val and vylem primarily modify the clause temporally and form the past tense equivalent of the given modal construction. The difference between the non-modal use of val and vylem lies in the difference between the first and second past tense in general. In their modal use val and vylem decrease the degree of modal force (also called as modal attenuation) and should be analyzed as particles. In such cases modal constructions can be interpreted as counterfactual conditionals. Differences can be characterized between the modal use of val and vylem . The particle vylem is associated with greater mental distance between the speaker and factuality and expresses that the likelihood of realization is small or nonexistent. therefore, it can be considered epistemic. The particle val does not distance the events from factuality to such a high extent as vylem . Also, native speakers associated a higher probability of fulfilment with the utterances formed with val . In my opinion, the difference between the modal use of the particles originates from their verbal use and from the differences between the first and second past tense.","PeriodicalId":41242,"journal":{"name":"Ezhegodnik Finno-Ugorskikh Issledovanii-Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ezhegodnik Finno-Ugorskikh Issledovanii-Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2224-9443-2021-15-4-599-618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Udmurt the past tense forms of the verb ’be’ ( val and vylem ) appear in different modal constructions and in the non-declarative moods. The paper focuses on the use of val and vylem in four modal constructions: two deontic, a desiderative and a permissive one. It is established that in such constructions val and vylem can have non-modal and modal use as well. In their non-modal sense val and vylem primarily modify the clause temporally and form the past tense equivalent of the given modal construction. The difference between the non-modal use of val and vylem lies in the difference between the first and second past tense in general. In their modal use val and vylem decrease the degree of modal force (also called as modal attenuation) and should be analyzed as particles. In such cases modal constructions can be interpreted as counterfactual conditionals. Differences can be characterized between the modal use of val and vylem . The particle vylem is associated with greater mental distance between the speaker and factuality and expresses that the likelihood of realization is small or nonexistent. therefore, it can be considered epistemic. The particle val does not distance the events from factuality to such a high extent as vylem . Also, native speakers associated a higher probability of fulfilment with the utterances formed with val . In my opinion, the difference between the modal use of the particles originates from their verbal use and from the differences between the first and second past tense.
UDMURT语气结构中动词BE的过去时形式
在乌德穆尔特语中,动词“be”的过去式形式(val和vylem)出现在不同的情态结构和非陈述性语气中。本文着重讨论了val和vylem在四个情态结构中的使用:两个道义、一个渴望和一个允许。在这种结构中,val和vylem可以有非情态和情态两种用法。在它们的非情态意义上val和vylem主要修饰从句的时间,并构成与给定情态结构等价的过去时。val和vylem的非情态用法的区别在于一般情况下第一和第二过去时的区别。在它们的模态使用中,val和vlem降低了模态力的程度(也称为模态衰减),应作为粒子进行分析。在这种情况下,情态结构可以解释为反事实条件句。val和vylem的情态用法有很大的不同。粒子流与说话者与事实之间的心理距离较大有关,表示实现的可能性很小或不存在。因此,它可以被认为是认识论的。粒子val不能像vylem那样将事件与事实高度分离。此外,以val为母语的人将更高的实现概率与val构成的话语联系起来。在我看来,小品情态用法的差异源于它们的动词用法以及第一和第二过去时之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信