Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among U.S. Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Hyung-Woo Lee, P. Robertson, Kitai Kim
{"title":"Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among U.S. Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences","authors":"Hyung-Woo Lee, P. Robertson, Kitai Kim","doi":"10.1177/0091026019869371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine whether the determinants of job satisfaction vary between male and female and between White and minority employees of the U.S. federal government. The study investigates nine potential determinants associated with existence, relatedness, growth needs, and organizational equity, based on data from the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. The study uses multiple regression analysis to assess and compare the strength of the relationships between these determinants and work satisfaction among each of four demographic subgroups (White males, White females, minority males, and minority females). Results indicate that there are no dramatic differences among these groups in terms of which factors have the strongest impact on satisfaction. However, a few subtle distinctions are apparent. In particular, employee development is a higher priority for men than for women, and recognition for good work is not as important to minorities as it is to Whites. There is also some evidence of intersectionality, in that pay satisfaction and diversity management are most important to minority women and least important to White men, and workplace participation is most important to White men and least important to minority women. The study provides potential explanations of these findings, and briefly addresses implications for research and practice.","PeriodicalId":47366,"journal":{"name":"Public Personnel Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091026019869371","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Personnel Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019869371","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine whether the determinants of job satisfaction vary between male and female and between White and minority employees of the U.S. federal government. The study investigates nine potential determinants associated with existence, relatedness, growth needs, and organizational equity, based on data from the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. The study uses multiple regression analysis to assess and compare the strength of the relationships between these determinants and work satisfaction among each of four demographic subgroups (White males, White females, minority males, and minority females). Results indicate that there are no dramatic differences among these groups in terms of which factors have the strongest impact on satisfaction. However, a few subtle distinctions are apparent. In particular, employee development is a higher priority for men than for women, and recognition for good work is not as important to minorities as it is to Whites. There is also some evidence of intersectionality, in that pay satisfaction and diversity management are most important to minority women and least important to White men, and workplace participation is most important to White men and least important to minority women. The study provides potential explanations of these findings, and briefly addresses implications for research and practice.
美国联邦雇员工作满意度的决定因素:对种族和性别差异的调查
本研究的目的是检验美国联邦政府工作满意度的决定因素是否因男性和女性以及白人和少数族裔雇员而异。该研究基于2015年联邦雇员观点调查的数据,调查了与存在、相关性、成长需求和组织公平相关的九个潜在决定因素。该研究使用多元回归分析来评估和比较四个人口统计学亚组(白人男性、白人女性、少数族裔男性和少数族裔女性)中这些决定因素与工作满意度之间的关系强度。结果表明,在哪些因素对满意度的影响最大方面,这些群体之间没有显著差异。然而,一些细微的区别是显而易见的。特别是,员工发展对男性来说比女性更重要,对优秀工作的认可对少数族裔来说不像对白人那么重要。还有一些证据表明存在交叉性,薪酬满意度和多样性管理对少数族裔女性最重要,对白人男性最不重要,工作场所参与对白人男性更重要,对少数族裔妇女最不重要。该研究为这些发现提供了潜在的解释,并简要阐述了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信