Simple and Objective Evaluation Items for the Prognosis and Mortality of Delirium in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.

Psychiatric research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2023-06-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1176/appi.prcp.20230006
Yuzuru Shibuya, Ryota Kobayashi, Takuma Numazawa, Toyoki Toyoshima, Hiroshi Hayashi, Toshimasa Sone, Daichi Morioka, Akihito Suzuki, Shinobu Kawakatsu
{"title":"Simple and Objective Evaluation Items for the Prognosis and Mortality of Delirium in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.","authors":"Yuzuru Shibuya, Ryota Kobayashi, Takuma Numazawa, Toyoki Toyoshima, Hiroshi Hayashi, Toshimasa Sone, Daichi Morioka, Akihito Suzuki, Shinobu Kawakatsu","doi":"10.1176/appi.prcp.20230006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identifying factors associated with poor outcomes in patients with delirium is important for predicting prognosis. This retrospective study developed an easy and objective cognitive function measurement scale that can predict the prognosis and mortality related to delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five patients aged ≥65 years and diagnosed with delirium were included. Objective data regarding attention and orientation related to time and place were extracted from their medical records during the first consultation, and in total, six points were evaluated. The patients were categorized into high and low cognitive function (LCF) groups. The severity at the first visit and 1-week post-treatment was evaluated using the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale. Outcomes (survival or death) at 6 months from the initial visit were evaluated by reviewing medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score at the first visit was not significantly different between the two groups, 1 week after treatment, it was significantly lower in the high cognitive function (HCF) group than in the LCF group. Regarding the outcome (survival or death) after 6 months, the LCF group had significantly higher mortality than the HCF group. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the same result (OR = 17.049, 95% CI = 2.415-120.373, <i>p</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A simple cognitive assessment of attention and orientation may help predict unfavorable outcomes, including mortality, in patients with delirium.</p>","PeriodicalId":74592,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric research and clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":"126-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20230006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Identifying factors associated with poor outcomes in patients with delirium is important for predicting prognosis. This retrospective study developed an easy and objective cognitive function measurement scale that can predict the prognosis and mortality related to delirium.

Methods: Fifty-five patients aged ≥65 years and diagnosed with delirium were included. Objective data regarding attention and orientation related to time and place were extracted from their medical records during the first consultation, and in total, six points were evaluated. The patients were categorized into high and low cognitive function (LCF) groups. The severity at the first visit and 1-week post-treatment was evaluated using the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale. Outcomes (survival or death) at 6 months from the initial visit were evaluated by reviewing medical records.

Results: Although the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score at the first visit was not significantly different between the two groups, 1 week after treatment, it was significantly lower in the high cognitive function (HCF) group than in the LCF group. Regarding the outcome (survival or death) after 6 months, the LCF group had significantly higher mortality than the HCF group. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the same result (OR = 17.049, 95% CI = 2.415-120.373, p = 0.004).

Conclusion: A simple cognitive assessment of attention and orientation may help predict unfavorable outcomes, including mortality, in patients with delirium.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

现实世界临床实践中谵妄预后和死亡率的简单客观评价项目:初步回顾性研究
目的:确定与谵妄患者不良预后相关的因素对于预测预后非常重要。这项回顾性研究开发了一种简便、客观的认知功能测量量表,可预测与谵妄相关的预后和死亡率:方法:纳入 55 名年龄≥65 岁并被诊断为谵妄的患者。从首次就诊时的病历中提取与时间和地点相关的注意力和定向力方面的客观数据,共评估了六点。患者被分为高认知功能组和低认知功能组(LCF)。首次就诊和治疗后一周的严重程度采用临床整体印象-严重程度量表进行评估。通过查看病历,对首次就诊后 6 个月的结果(存活或死亡)进行评估:尽管两组患者在首次就诊时的临床总体印象-严重程度评分没有显著差异,但在治疗一周后,高认知功能组的临床总体印象-严重程度评分明显低于低认知功能组。关于 6 个月后的结果(存活或死亡),LCF 组的死亡率明显高于 HCF 组。多变量逻辑回归分析显示了相同的结果(OR = 17.049,95% CI = 2.415-120.373,p = 0.004):结论:对注意力和定向力进行简单的认知评估有助于预测谵妄患者的不良预后,包括死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书