Engaging with difficult knowledge in teaching in post-truth era: from theory to practice within diverse disciplinary areas

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
B. Dadvand, H. Cahill, Michalinos Zembylas
{"title":"Engaging with difficult knowledge in teaching in post-truth era: from theory to practice within diverse disciplinary areas","authors":"B. Dadvand, H. Cahill, Michalinos Zembylas","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2021.1977985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large body of research has examined the implications of engagement with difficult knowledge across a range of areas in education including multi-cultural and anti-racist (teacher) education (Carson and Johnston 2000; Zembylas and Papamichael 2017), gender education (Cahill and Dadvand 2020; Robinson and Davies 2008), Indigenous education (Kerr 2014; Mcconaghy 2003) and history education (Lehrer, Milton, and Patterson 2011; Levy and Sheppard 2018). Despite the rich and growing body of work, debates about difficult knowledge in teaching and learning remain largely constrained within disciplinary boundaries and face the challenge associated with translating theory into practice effectively. This special issue addresses this gap focusing on the often-under-acknowledged dimensions of educators’ work when they are called upon to engage with and re-present difficult knowledge. The overarching aim is to advance scholarship in the application of theory to practice in discussions about difficult knowledge by: (1) making visible the complex ways in which personal, social, material, institutional, ideological, historical factors create affective entanglements and mediate pedagogical responses to difficult knowledge and (2) extrapolating pedagogical offerings from scholarship across different disciplinary areas in education to inform a more coherent response to the challenges that educators face when engaging with forms of difficult knowledge. This special issue is born out of our interest in advancing the use of theory to inform practice in the field of teaching and teacher education. The special issue is also driven by a shared desire to address different forms of injustice through praxisbased and productive encounters with difficult knowledge across disciplinary boundaries. At the backdrop of our discussions about difficult knowledge in teaching and learning lie two challenges associated with the current rise of ‘post-truth’ politics and the increasing social, political, economic and environmental uncertainties, which have made the need for effective educational responses ever more urgent. The enduring and evolving nature of these challenges have intensified calls to open up new ways of thinking about responsibility and solidarity with ‘the other’ beyond one’s personal, spatial and temporal contexts.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"30 1","pages":"285 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1977985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A large body of research has examined the implications of engagement with difficult knowledge across a range of areas in education including multi-cultural and anti-racist (teacher) education (Carson and Johnston 2000; Zembylas and Papamichael 2017), gender education (Cahill and Dadvand 2020; Robinson and Davies 2008), Indigenous education (Kerr 2014; Mcconaghy 2003) and history education (Lehrer, Milton, and Patterson 2011; Levy and Sheppard 2018). Despite the rich and growing body of work, debates about difficult knowledge in teaching and learning remain largely constrained within disciplinary boundaries and face the challenge associated with translating theory into practice effectively. This special issue addresses this gap focusing on the often-under-acknowledged dimensions of educators’ work when they are called upon to engage with and re-present difficult knowledge. The overarching aim is to advance scholarship in the application of theory to practice in discussions about difficult knowledge by: (1) making visible the complex ways in which personal, social, material, institutional, ideological, historical factors create affective entanglements and mediate pedagogical responses to difficult knowledge and (2) extrapolating pedagogical offerings from scholarship across different disciplinary areas in education to inform a more coherent response to the challenges that educators face when engaging with forms of difficult knowledge. This special issue is born out of our interest in advancing the use of theory to inform practice in the field of teaching and teacher education. The special issue is also driven by a shared desire to address different forms of injustice through praxisbased and productive encounters with difficult knowledge across disciplinary boundaries. At the backdrop of our discussions about difficult knowledge in teaching and learning lie two challenges associated with the current rise of ‘post-truth’ politics and the increasing social, political, economic and environmental uncertainties, which have made the need for effective educational responses ever more urgent. The enduring and evolving nature of these challenges have intensified calls to open up new ways of thinking about responsibility and solidarity with ‘the other’ beyond one’s personal, spatial and temporal contexts.
后真理时代的教学困境:从理论到实践
大量的研究调查了在教育的一系列领域中,包括多元文化和反种族主义(教师)教育中,与困难知识接触的影响(Carson and Johnston 2000;Zembylas and Papamichael 2017),性别教育(Cahill and Dadvand 2020;Robinson and Davies 2008),土著教育(Kerr 2014;Mcconaghy 2003)和历史教育(Lehrer, Milton, and Patterson 2011;Levy and Sheppard 2018)。尽管有丰富和不断增长的工作,关于教学和学习中困难知识的争论仍然很大程度上局限于学科界限,并面临着将理论有效地转化为实践的挑战。本期特刊解决了这一差距,重点关注教育工作者在被要求接触和再现困难知识时经常被忽视的工作方面。总体目标是通过以下方式促进理论应用于讨论困难知识的实践:(1)可见的复杂方式个人、社会、物质、制度、意识形态、历史因素创造情感纠葛和协调教育应对困难的知识和(2)推断教学产品从不同学科领域学术教育通知更连贯的反应时,教育工作者所面临的挑战与困难的知识形式。本期特刊源于我们对促进理论在教学和教师教育领域应用于实践的兴趣。通过跨学科界限的困难知识的实践和富有成效的接触,解决不同形式的不公正现象,这一共同愿望也推动了这一特别问题。在我们讨论教与学中困难知识的背景下,有两个挑战与当前“后真相”政治的兴起以及日益增加的社会、政治、经济和环境不确定性有关,这使得有效的教育响应的需求更加迫切。这些挑战的持久性和不断演变的性质,使我们更加需要开辟新的思维方式,超越个人、空间和时间背景,思考责任和与“他者”的团结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信