The Possibility of Regulatory Function of Judicial Power

IF 0.1
Goran Dajović
{"title":"The Possibility of Regulatory Function of Judicial Power","authors":"Goran Dajović","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22108a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents two theses. The first is that previous court judgments can be „sources“ of general rules and standards that will constraint the courts, as decision-makers, even if they are not formally established as legally binding. The second is that it should be so for several reasons – the most important being predictability and equality.\n\nIn this part of the article the concepts of separation of powers, types of state functions, and judicial power are explained. The reasons why the judicial power can perform the law-making function in a legal system in which it is not formally established are presented. As an illustration of how the system in which courts perform a law-making function works, the application of the doctrine of stare decisis in the USA is described. Finally, several decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia that indicate similar practice in Serbian legal system are analyzed.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22108a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents two theses. The first is that previous court judgments can be „sources“ of general rules and standards that will constraint the courts, as decision-makers, even if they are not formally established as legally binding. The second is that it should be so for several reasons – the most important being predictability and equality. In this part of the article the concepts of separation of powers, types of state functions, and judicial power are explained. The reasons why the judicial power can perform the law-making function in a legal system in which it is not formally established are presented. As an illustration of how the system in which courts perform a law-making function works, the application of the doctrine of stare decisis in the USA is described. Finally, several decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia that indicate similar practice in Serbian legal system are analyzed.
司法权调节功能的可能性
本文提出了两个论点。首先,以前的法院判决可以成为一般规则和标准的“来源”,这些规则和标准将约束作为决策者的法院,即使它们没有被正式确立为具有法律约束力。其次,它应该如此,原因有几个——最重要的是可预测性和平等性。在这一部分中,对三权分立的概念、国家职能的类型和司法权进行了阐述。分析了司法权在尚未正式确立的法律体系中能够行使立法职能的原因。为了说明法院执行立法职能的制度是如何运作的,本文描述了“依先例行事”原则在美国的应用。最后,分析了塞尔维亚宪法法院的几项判决,这些判决表明了塞尔维亚法律制度中类似的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书