Expected but not accepted: Victimisation, gender, and Islamophobia in Australia

IF 1.5 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Derya Iner, G. Mason, N. Asquith
{"title":"Expected but not accepted: Victimisation, gender, and Islamophobia in Australia","authors":"Derya Iner, G. Mason, N. Asquith","doi":"10.1177/02697580221084115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muslim’s women’s visibility and perceived vulnerability make them primary targets of routine Islamophobia in public spaces. This article builds on existing research on intersectionality between Islamophobia, gender, and victimisation. It offers fresh data on Islamophobia against women by analysing complaints of interpersonal hostility (N = 73) made to the Islamophobia Register Australia between 2016 and 2017. This quantitative analysis confirms that there is much consistency between Western nations in the nature of Islamophobia directed to women. At the same time, the article brings new perspectives to our understanding of Islamophobic hostility. Drawing on an in-depth analysis of eight case studies, the article illuminates the restrictive impact that routine Islamophobia has on Muslim women’s daily lives, generating a sense of responsibility for their own safety in the absence of bystander intervention. Yet, with comparatively high levels of social capital, participants in our study did not simply acquiesce to stereotypes that deny them the status of ‘ideal’ victim. Instead, they sought to reduce the destructive impact of victimisation through active attempts to raise public awareness and reassert agency. Our study shows that Muslim women’s responses to Islamophobia are not homogeneous. This variation originates in heterogeneity between Muslim women in Western countries.","PeriodicalId":45622,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Victimology","volume":"28 1","pages":"286 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Victimology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580221084115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Muslim’s women’s visibility and perceived vulnerability make them primary targets of routine Islamophobia in public spaces. This article builds on existing research on intersectionality between Islamophobia, gender, and victimisation. It offers fresh data on Islamophobia against women by analysing complaints of interpersonal hostility (N = 73) made to the Islamophobia Register Australia between 2016 and 2017. This quantitative analysis confirms that there is much consistency between Western nations in the nature of Islamophobia directed to women. At the same time, the article brings new perspectives to our understanding of Islamophobic hostility. Drawing on an in-depth analysis of eight case studies, the article illuminates the restrictive impact that routine Islamophobia has on Muslim women’s daily lives, generating a sense of responsibility for their own safety in the absence of bystander intervention. Yet, with comparatively high levels of social capital, participants in our study did not simply acquiesce to stereotypes that deny them the status of ‘ideal’ victim. Instead, they sought to reduce the destructive impact of victimisation through active attempts to raise public awareness and reassert agency. Our study shows that Muslim women’s responses to Islamophobia are not homogeneous. This variation originates in heterogeneity between Muslim women in Western countries.
预期但未被接受:澳大利亚的受害者、性别和伊斯兰恐惧症
穆斯林妇女的知名度和易受伤害性使她们成为公共场所日常伊斯兰恐惧症的主要目标。这篇文章建立在对伊斯兰恐惧症、性别和受害之间交叉性的现有研究基础上。它通过分析2016年至2017年间向澳大利亚伊斯兰恐惧症登记处提出的人际敌意投诉(N=73),提供了针对女性的伊斯兰恐惧症的最新数据。这一定量分析证实,西方国家在针对妇女的伊斯兰恐惧症的性质上有很大的一致性。与此同时,这篇文章为我们理解仇视伊斯兰教的敌意带来了新的视角。文章通过对八个案例研究的深入分析,阐明了日常伊斯兰恐惧症对穆斯林妇女日常生活的限制性影响,在没有旁观者干预的情况下,产生了对自身安全的责任感。然而,由于社会资本水平相对较高,我们研究的参与者并没有简单地默认那些剥夺他们“理想”受害者地位的刻板印象。相反,他们试图通过积极努力提高公众意识和重新确立机构地位来减少受害的破坏性影响。我们的研究表明,穆斯林妇女对伊斯兰恐惧症的反应并不一致。这种差异源于西方国家穆斯林女性之间的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Review of Victimology
International Review of Victimology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信