Kendall's W and Inter-rater Reliability

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
R. W. Emerson
{"title":"Kendall's W and Inter-rater Reliability","authors":"R. W. Emerson","doi":"10.1177/0145482x231188882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this issue, the article entitled, “Improving Learning of Figurative Concepts in Individuals with Blindness: Adopting Teaching Strategies to Enhance Learning Motivation,” reports the results of a statistical test called Kendall’s W. The full name of the test is Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance, and it is a statistical test that is designed to measure the level of agreement among raters, or a measure of interrater reliability. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 1 being full agreement among raters and 0 being absolutely no agreement among raters. The easiest way to measure how much agreement exists among raters is by looking at the percent agreement, which also ranges between 0 and 1. A more rigorous and more common statistic is Cohen’s Kappa, which calculates the percentage of items the raters agree on but also accounts for the fact that raters might happen to agree by chance on some items. Cohen’s Kappa (k) also ranges from 0 to 1. As with most statistical tests, Kendall’s W comes along with a p value or level of significance. This means that the W statistic can be evaluated both from the point of view of statistical significance as well as the actual size of the effect. This item is similar to one known as a Pearson correlation coefficient, which is a measure of how closely two variables are related. This statistical test also results in an output measure (r) that ranges from 0 to 1 and a significance level. However, Kendall’s W is not a true correlation coefficient and the raw W measure cannot be viewed in exactly the same way that we view the r connection between two variables. However, there is a linear transformation between the two. The equation is","PeriodicalId":47438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","volume":"117 1","pages":"336 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x231188882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this issue, the article entitled, “Improving Learning of Figurative Concepts in Individuals with Blindness: Adopting Teaching Strategies to Enhance Learning Motivation,” reports the results of a statistical test called Kendall’s W. The full name of the test is Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance, and it is a statistical test that is designed to measure the level of agreement among raters, or a measure of interrater reliability. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 1 being full agreement among raters and 0 being absolutely no agreement among raters. The easiest way to measure how much agreement exists among raters is by looking at the percent agreement, which also ranges between 0 and 1. A more rigorous and more common statistic is Cohen’s Kappa, which calculates the percentage of items the raters agree on but also accounts for the fact that raters might happen to agree by chance on some items. Cohen’s Kappa (k) also ranges from 0 to 1. As with most statistical tests, Kendall’s W comes along with a p value or level of significance. This means that the W statistic can be evaluated both from the point of view of statistical significance as well as the actual size of the effect. This item is similar to one known as a Pearson correlation coefficient, which is a measure of how closely two variables are related. This statistical test also results in an output measure (r) that ranges from 0 to 1 and a significance level. However, Kendall’s W is not a true correlation coefficient and the raw W measure cannot be viewed in exactly the same way that we view the r connection between two variables. However, there is a linear transformation between the two. The equation is
Kendall's W和内部信度
本期,题为《提高盲人形象概念的学习:采用教学策略提高学习动机》的文章报道了一项名为肯德尔W的统计测试的结果。该测试的全名是肯德尔一致系数,这是一种统计测试,旨在衡量评分者之间的一致性水平,或衡量评分者间的可靠性。它的范围从0到1,1表示评分者完全同意,0表示评分者绝对不同意。衡量评分者之间达成一致程度的最简单方法是查看百分比一致性,该百分比也在0到1之间。一个更严格、更常见的统计数据是Cohen的Kappa,它计算了评分者同意的项目的百分比,但也解释了评分者可能碰巧在某些项目上同意的事实。Cohen的Kappa(k)也在0到1的范围内。与大多数统计测试一样,Kendall的W伴随着p值或显著性水平。这意味着W统计量既可以从统计学意义的角度进行评估,也可以从效应的实际大小进行评估。这一项类似于皮尔逊相关系数,后者是衡量两个变量之间关系密切程度的指标。该统计测试还产生范围从0到1的输出度量(r)和显著性水平。然而,Kendall的W不是一个真正的相关系数,并且原始W测度不能以与我们看待两个变量之间的r联系完全相同的方式来看待。然而,两者之间存在线性变换。方程式为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness is the essential professional resource for information about visual impairment (that is, blindness or low vision). The international peer-reviewed journal of record in the field, it delivers current research and best practice information, commentary from authoritative experts on critical topics, News From the Field, and a calendar of important events. Practitioners and researchers, policymakers and administrators, counselors and advocates rely on JVIB for its delivery of cutting-edge research and the most up-to-date practices in the field of visual impairment and blindness. Available in print and online 24/7, JVIB offers immediate access to information from the leading researchers, teachers of students with visual impairments (often referred to as TVIs), orientation and mobility (O&M) practitioners, vision rehabilitation therapists (often referred to as VRTs), early interventionists, and low vision therapists (often referred to as LVTs) in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信