Interactions with Standardized Patients to Evaluate Students’ Psychotherapy-Competencies

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
G. Alpers, Kristina Hengen
{"title":"Interactions with Standardized Patients to Evaluate Students’ Psychotherapy-Competencies","authors":"G. Alpers, Kristina Hengen","doi":"10.1026/1616-3443/a000636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The use of standardized patients (SPs) in the training of prospective practitioners is a well-established didactic tool in medical schools. Only recently have simulations of patients in psychotherapy been introduced into the training of psychologists. By integrating psychotherapy training into university-level master’s programs, German law now requires licensing exams for psychotherapists (i. e., Approbationsprüfung) to include an assessment of therapeutic competencies in simulated interactions with SPs. Yet, it has not been examined whether these simulations are useful for a reliable assessment of competencies in psychotherapy trainees. Also, we need to develop standardized instruments to evaluate competencies in entry-level psychotherapists. As part of a university course, we trained master’s-level students from three cohorts in clinical interviewing techniques (course title: Klinisch-psychologische Gesprächsführung). We analyzed videotaped 20-min sequences of N = 104 students while they interviewed one of N = 38 trained SPs. The students’ task was to interview the SP, conduct a brief case history, and use the interviewing skills they had learned in class. Two independent raters evaluated their psychotherapeutic competencies with an adapted version of the German Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS). Raters evaluated students’ performance on two subscales and the total score with satisfactory interrater agreement (intraclass correlations). In general, students performed well in the interviews: They structured the sessions sufficiently, and their global psychotherapeutic competencies were satisfactory. However, the psychotherapeutic competencies of master’s students fell short of the benchmark derived from experienced psychotherapists. This pilot study provides first evidence that simulated interviews with SPs may be a reliable tool in the assessment of practical competencies in psychotherapy trainees at an early stage of their training. Moreover, we found that the CTS, which has demonstrated validity to quantify competencies of psychotherapists, is applicable and reliable in this training context as well. In sum, this suggests that simulated interviews with SPs may be useful for evaluating psychotherapeutic competencies of psychotherapy trainees.","PeriodicalId":46502,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. The use of standardized patients (SPs) in the training of prospective practitioners is a well-established didactic tool in medical schools. Only recently have simulations of patients in psychotherapy been introduced into the training of psychologists. By integrating psychotherapy training into university-level master’s programs, German law now requires licensing exams for psychotherapists (i. e., Approbationsprüfung) to include an assessment of therapeutic competencies in simulated interactions with SPs. Yet, it has not been examined whether these simulations are useful for a reliable assessment of competencies in psychotherapy trainees. Also, we need to develop standardized instruments to evaluate competencies in entry-level psychotherapists. As part of a university course, we trained master’s-level students from three cohorts in clinical interviewing techniques (course title: Klinisch-psychologische Gesprächsführung). We analyzed videotaped 20-min sequences of N = 104 students while they interviewed one of N = 38 trained SPs. The students’ task was to interview the SP, conduct a brief case history, and use the interviewing skills they had learned in class. Two independent raters evaluated their psychotherapeutic competencies with an adapted version of the German Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS). Raters evaluated students’ performance on two subscales and the total score with satisfactory interrater agreement (intraclass correlations). In general, students performed well in the interviews: They structured the sessions sufficiently, and their global psychotherapeutic competencies were satisfactory. However, the psychotherapeutic competencies of master’s students fell short of the benchmark derived from experienced psychotherapists. This pilot study provides first evidence that simulated interviews with SPs may be a reliable tool in the assessment of practical competencies in psychotherapy trainees at an early stage of their training. Moreover, we found that the CTS, which has demonstrated validity to quantify competencies of psychotherapists, is applicable and reliable in this training context as well. In sum, this suggests that simulated interviews with SPs may be useful for evaluating psychotherapeutic competencies of psychotherapy trainees.
与标准化病人互动评估学生心理治疗能力
摘要使用标准化病人(SPs)培训未来的从业人员是一种行之有效的教学工具,在医学院。直到最近,心理治疗病人的模拟才被引入到心理学家的培训中。通过将心理治疗培训纳入大学水平的硕士课程,德国法律现在要求心理治疗师的执照考试。(approbationspr),包括与SPs模拟相互作用的治疗能力评估。然而,还没有研究这些模拟是否对心理治疗受训人员的能力有可靠的评估。此外,我们需要开发标准化的工具来评估初级心理治疗师的能力。作为大学课程的一部分,我们对来自三个队列的硕士生进行临床访谈技术培训(课程名称:Klinisch-psychologische Gesprächsführung)。我们分析了N = 104名学生采访N = 38名训练有素的SPs中的一名的20分钟录像序列。学生的任务是采访SP,进行简短的案例介绍,并使用他们在课堂上学到的采访技巧。两名独立评分者用德国认知治疗量表(CTS)评估他们的心理治疗能力。评分者在两个分量表和总分上评估学生的表现,评分者之间的一致性(班级内相关性)令人满意。总的来说,学生们在面试中表现良好:他们充分地组织了会议,他们的整体心理治疗能力令人满意。然而,硕士生的心理治疗能力低于经验丰富的心理治疗师的基准。这项初步研究提供了第一个证据,证明与SPs的模拟访谈可能是评估心理治疗受训者在其培训的早期阶段的实践能力的可靠工具。此外,我们发现CTS在量化心理治疗师的能力方面是有效的,在这种培训背景下也是适用的和可靠的。综上所述,这表明与SPs的模拟访谈可能有助于评估心理治疗受训者的心理治疗能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs) zugleich Organ der Fachgruppen Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), der Sektion Klinische Psychologie im Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen (BDP), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verhaltenstherapie e.V. (DGVT), der Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Gesprächspsychotherapie e.V. (GWG), der Sektion Klinische Psychologie im Berufsverband Österreichischer Psychologinnen und Psychologen (B.Ö.P.) und der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für VerhaltensModifikation e.V. (AVM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信