A step by step guidelines to project the COVID-19 cases using a Deep Learning Approach

{"title":"A step by step guidelines to project the COVID-19 cases using a Deep Learning Approach","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/an.05.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Numerous mathematical models have been developed to forecast COVID-19 cases and helped to plan effectively by strengthening public health infrastructure and services. Many researchers incorporated the long-short term memory model (LSTM) but they have not clearly explained the workflow and steps involved in this model. Moreover, being relatively new, these models are not yet popular among biomedical researchers due to a lack of expertise. This paper presents such models as a tutorial for easy understanding and appropriate use. This includes Python codes and real-time data with instructions for implementation to forecast pandemics like COVID-19. Data and Methods: Daily cases in India from 1-Dec-2021 to 10-Feb-2022 and, in the UK from 1-May-2021 to 10-Feb-2022 were used to train the models. We used Convolutional-LSTM (CNN-LSTM) model and simple LSTM models to forecast COVID-19 cases. Models were validated using data from 11 to 25-Feb-2022. Results: CNN-LSTM and simple LSTM were fitted very well with R2 0.95 and 0.97 for India. The models were validated with RMSE and it was 9972.81 and 19285.57 for CNN-LSTM and the simple LSTM model. The R2 value of CNN-LSTM and simple LSTM models for UK data were 0.77 and 0.84 respectively. RMSE was 12111.95 for CNN-LSTM and 8935.75 for simple LSTM in the validation. Conclusion: Simple LSTM works better while training whereas the performance of CNN-LSTM was found to be better in validation. Therefore, it is suggested that train various models instead of sticking to one and revise them regularly as the behavior of an epidemic generally changes over time.","PeriodicalId":93246,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neurology and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/an.05.03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Numerous mathematical models have been developed to forecast COVID-19 cases and helped to plan effectively by strengthening public health infrastructure and services. Many researchers incorporated the long-short term memory model (LSTM) but they have not clearly explained the workflow and steps involved in this model. Moreover, being relatively new, these models are not yet popular among biomedical researchers due to a lack of expertise. This paper presents such models as a tutorial for easy understanding and appropriate use. This includes Python codes and real-time data with instructions for implementation to forecast pandemics like COVID-19. Data and Methods: Daily cases in India from 1-Dec-2021 to 10-Feb-2022 and, in the UK from 1-May-2021 to 10-Feb-2022 were used to train the models. We used Convolutional-LSTM (CNN-LSTM) model and simple LSTM models to forecast COVID-19 cases. Models were validated using data from 11 to 25-Feb-2022. Results: CNN-LSTM and simple LSTM were fitted very well with R2 0.95 and 0.97 for India. The models were validated with RMSE and it was 9972.81 and 19285.57 for CNN-LSTM and the simple LSTM model. The R2 value of CNN-LSTM and simple LSTM models for UK data were 0.77 and 0.84 respectively. RMSE was 12111.95 for CNN-LSTM and 8935.75 for simple LSTM in the validation. Conclusion: Simple LSTM works better while training whereas the performance of CNN-LSTM was found to be better in validation. Therefore, it is suggested that train various models instead of sticking to one and revise them regularly as the behavior of an epidemic generally changes over time.
使用深度学习方法预测新冠肺炎病例的分步指南
背景:已经开发了许多数学模型来预测新冠肺炎病例,并通过加强公共卫生基础设施和服务来帮助进行有效规划。许多研究人员引入了长短期记忆模型(LSTM),但他们没有清楚地解释该模型中涉及的工作流程和步骤。此外,由于缺乏专业知识,这些模型相对较新,尚未在生物医学研究人员中流行。本文将这些模型作为教程介绍,以便于理解和适当使用。这包括Python代码和实时数据,以及预测新冠肺炎等流行病的实施说明。数据和方法:使用2021年12月1日至2022年2月10日印度和2021年5月1日到2022年2日10日英国的每日病例来训练模型。我们使用卷积LSTM(CNN-LSTM)模型和简单的LSTM模型来预测新冠肺炎病例。使用2022年2月11日至25日的数据对模型进行了验证。结果:CNN-LSTM和简单LSTM拟合良好,印度的R2分别为0.95和0.97。用RMSE对模型进行了验证,CNN-LSTM和简单LSTM模型分别为9972.81和19285.57。英国数据的CNN-LSTM和简单LSTM模型的R2值分别为0.77和0.84。在验证中,CNN-LSTM的RMSE为12111.95,而简单LSTM的RMSE则为8935.75。结论:简单LSTM在训练时效果更好,而CNN-LSTM在验证时表现更好。因此,建议训练各种模型,而不是拘泥于一个模型,并定期修改它们,因为流行病的行为通常会随着时间的推移而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信