The Rise of Dishonest Leaders: Causes and Solutions

IF 7.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
E. Huppert, E. Levine
{"title":"The Rise of Dishonest Leaders: Causes and Solutions","authors":"E. Huppert, E. Levine","doi":"10.5465/amp.2021.0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Honesty is a fundamental human value. Yet, the world has witnessed increasing indifference towards honesty over the past several years and stood by while dishonest leaders rose to positions of power and influence. This article provides novel theorizing to explain the rise of dishonest leaders. We theorize that intergroup conflict elicits a zero-sum mindset, leading people to focus myopically on how their ingroup can triumph over an outgroup. This focus leads people not only to engage in dishonesty, but also to judge dishonesty more positively in others, including leaders. Specifically, when dishonesty is used to defeat an outgroup, it is perceived as a signal of competence and parochial benevolence, despite being costly in the long run. As a result, people knowingly support (e.g., elect, follow) dishonest leaders. In the present article, we integrate recent findings in organizational behavior, moral psychology, political science, and sociology to build this theory. We conclude by discussing new strategies that individuals and organizations can implement to promote honesty. Ultimately, this research deepens our understanding of honesty and the forces that promote and impede its development in leaders and their followers.","PeriodicalId":48215,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Honesty is a fundamental human value. Yet, the world has witnessed increasing indifference towards honesty over the past several years and stood by while dishonest leaders rose to positions of power and influence. This article provides novel theorizing to explain the rise of dishonest leaders. We theorize that intergroup conflict elicits a zero-sum mindset, leading people to focus myopically on how their ingroup can triumph over an outgroup. This focus leads people not only to engage in dishonesty, but also to judge dishonesty more positively in others, including leaders. Specifically, when dishonesty is used to defeat an outgroup, it is perceived as a signal of competence and parochial benevolence, despite being costly in the long run. As a result, people knowingly support (e.g., elect, follow) dishonest leaders. In the present article, we integrate recent findings in organizational behavior, moral psychology, political science, and sociology to build this theory. We conclude by discussing new strategies that individuals and organizations can implement to promote honesty. Ultimately, this research deepens our understanding of honesty and the forces that promote and impede its development in leaders and their followers.
不诚实领导人的崛起:原因和解决办法
诚实是人类的基本价值。然而,在过去的几年里,世界见证了对诚实的越来越冷漠,当不诚实的领导人上升到权力和影响力的位置时,他们袖手旁观。这篇文章提供了新的理论来解释不诚实领导人的崛起。我们的理论是,群体间的冲突会引发一种零和思维,导致人们目光短浅地关注他们的内部群体如何战胜外部群体。这种关注不仅会导致人们参与不诚实行为,还会更积极地评判他人(包括领导者)的不诚实行为。具体来说,当不诚实被用来击败外群体时,它被视为能力和狭隘仁慈的信号,尽管从长远来看代价高昂。结果,人们故意支持(例如,选举、追随)不诚实的领导人。在本文中,我们整合了组织行为学、道德心理学、政治学和社会学的最新研究成果来构建这一理论。最后,我们讨论了个人和组织可以实施的促进诚信的新策略。最终,本研究加深了我们对诚实的理解,以及促进和阻碍领导者及其追随者诚实发展的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Academy of Management Perspectives (AMP) aims to provide valuable insights to current and future thought leaders, including educators, business writers, consultants, executives, policy makers, and other professionals involved in management practice and policy. The publication seeks to bridge the gap between scholarly research and practical applications by presenting evidence-based approaches to address crucial management issues. AMP publishes research papers that employ quantitative or qualitative evidence, either from a single study or a compilation of studies within a specific field of research. The journal does not accept opinion pieces but encourages articles that focus on the implications of findings for policy and practice rather than theoretical implications. Examples of suitable articles for publication in AMP include practitioner or policy-oriented reviews of empirical studies, descriptive articles that contribute to our comprehension of management practices and strategic approaches, and articles highlighting the practical and policy implications of evidence-based work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信