A network approach to understanding obsessions and compulsions

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
David Berle , Vladan Starcevic , Bethany Wootton , Sandra Arnáez , Stéphanie Baggio
{"title":"A network approach to understanding obsessions and compulsions","authors":"David Berle ,&nbsp;Vladan Starcevic ,&nbsp;Bethany Wootton ,&nbsp;Sandra Arnáez ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Baggio","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Efforts to understand the constellation of symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have typically relied on models where latent variable(s) are assumed to underlie all symptoms. In contrast, a network approach does not assume that there are underlying latent variables and allows for the possibility that clusters of symptoms may mutually reinforce each other. We aimed to determine whether obsessions and compulsions formed a coherent and mutually reinforcing network of symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>400 participants were recruited online and administered the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R). A network analysis was computed using an Extended Bayesian Information Criterion estimator.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were five communities of symptoms: 1. A mixed contamination and checking community, 2. An ordering/arranging community, 3. A superstitious/counting/repeating community, 4. A mixed hoarding and checking community, and 5. An intrusive thoughts community. In the accuracy check, edges displayed wide confidence intervals, indicating that edges’ strength could not be interpreted. Additional analyses at the level of OCI-R subscales indicated that checking was significantly more central than other subscales in the network.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Obsessions and compulsions may be related in a mutually reinforcing way, thereby constituting OCD as a psychopathological entity. Prospective investigations are needed to ascertain the directionality of relationships in the network.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364923000076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Efforts to understand the constellation of symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have typically relied on models where latent variable(s) are assumed to underlie all symptoms. In contrast, a network approach does not assume that there are underlying latent variables and allows for the possibility that clusters of symptoms may mutually reinforce each other. We aimed to determine whether obsessions and compulsions formed a coherent and mutually reinforcing network of symptoms.

Method

400 participants were recruited online and administered the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R). A network analysis was computed using an Extended Bayesian Information Criterion estimator.

Results

There were five communities of symptoms: 1. A mixed contamination and checking community, 2. An ordering/arranging community, 3. A superstitious/counting/repeating community, 4. A mixed hoarding and checking community, and 5. An intrusive thoughts community. In the accuracy check, edges displayed wide confidence intervals, indicating that edges’ strength could not be interpreted. Additional analyses at the level of OCI-R subscales indicated that checking was significantly more central than other subscales in the network.

Conclusions

Obsessions and compulsions may be related in a mutually reinforcing way, thereby constituting OCD as a psychopathological entity. Prospective investigations are needed to ascertain the directionality of relationships in the network.

一种理解强迫和强迫的网络方法
背景:了解强迫症(OCD)症状群的努力通常依赖于假设潜在变量是所有症状的基础的模型。相比之下,网络方法不假设存在潜在变量,并允许症状集群相互加强的可能性。我们的目的是确定强迫和强迫是否形成了一个连贯的、相互加强的症状网络。方法在线招募400名被试进行强迫症量表(OCI-R)测试。利用扩展贝叶斯信息准则估计器计算了网络分析。结果临床症状分为5个群体:1.临床症状;混合污染和检查社区;2 .有序/安排社区;3 .迷信/计数/重复的群体;一个混合的囤积和检查社区;一个侵入性的思想社区。在精度检查中,边缘显示较宽的置信区间,表明边缘的强度无法解释。在OCI-R子量表水平上的进一步分析表明,检查明显比网络中的其他子量表更为中心。结论强迫与强迫可能是一种相辅相成的关系,从而构成强迫症的精神病理实体。需要前瞻性的调查来确定网络中关系的方向性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信