Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jessamy Kromhout, E. Scheckle
{"title":"Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature","authors":"Jessamy Kromhout, E. Scheckle","doi":"10.4102/rw.v12i1.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Much of the research in literacy focuses on what learners fail to do, especially in the early grades, but it is equally important to research successful readers. In particular learners’ experiences with literature contribute to our understanding of the possibilities literary texts offer. This article focused on learners’ responses to Advanced Programme (AP) English, which was an optional subject offered at an ex-Model C school, to understand how the learners had taken up these literary texts.Objectives: This study explored how matric learners spoke about the literature they had studied, in their AP English, in an informal group meeting.Methods: A qualitative case study was used to explore learners’ responses to literature. A final focus group meeting at the end of their matric year provides the data for this article. The transcriptions were coded using repeated patterns for themes to explore the stances taken in relation to the literature whether efferent or aesthetic.Results: The data showed how learners had incorporated fragments from the literature into their own utterances so that their language use echoed the literature. In addition to an efferent exam focus, the literature and AP English practices were used in both Art and Home Language English examinations.Conclusions: Learners need opportunities to talk about the multiple voices of literature in their lives. This kind of talk offers a different perspective on how literature can enrich, disrupt and extend learners’ thinking about literature and themselves. This research offers a counterpoint to examination results and contributes to building a nation of readers.","PeriodicalId":42041,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v12i1.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Much of the research in literacy focuses on what learners fail to do, especially in the early grades, but it is equally important to research successful readers. In particular learners’ experiences with literature contribute to our understanding of the possibilities literary texts offer. This article focused on learners’ responses to Advanced Programme (AP) English, which was an optional subject offered at an ex-Model C school, to understand how the learners had taken up these literary texts.Objectives: This study explored how matric learners spoke about the literature they had studied, in their AP English, in an informal group meeting.Methods: A qualitative case study was used to explore learners’ responses to literature. A final focus group meeting at the end of their matric year provides the data for this article. The transcriptions were coded using repeated patterns for themes to explore the stances taken in relation to the literature whether efferent or aesthetic.Results: The data showed how learners had incorporated fragments from the literature into their own utterances so that their language use echoed the literature. In addition to an efferent exam focus, the literature and AP English practices were used in both Art and Home Language English examinations.Conclusions: Learners need opportunities to talk about the multiple voices of literature in their lives. This kind of talk offers a different perspective on how literature can enrich, disrupt and extend learners’ thinking about literature and themselves. This research offers a counterpoint to examination results and contributes to building a nation of readers.
多重声音:学习者对文学的反思
背景:许多关于识字的研究都集中在学习者没有做到的事情上,尤其是在低年级,但研究成功的读者同样重要。特别是学习者的文学经验有助于我们理解文学文本所提供的可能性。这篇文章的重点是学习者对高级课程英语的反应,这是前C模式学校提供的一门选修课,以了解学习者是如何学习这些文学文本的。目的:本研究探讨了预科生如何在非正式小组会议上用AP英语谈论他们所学的文学作品。方法:采用定性案例研究的方法,探究学习者对文学的反应。在他们的预科学年结束时,最后一次焦点小组会议为本文提供了数据。转录使用主题的重复模式进行编码,以探索与文学相关的立场,无论是积极的还是审美的。结果:数据显示了学习者如何将文献片段融入自己的话语中,从而使他们的语言使用与文献相呼应。除了突出的考试重点外,文学和AP英语实践也被用于艺术和家庭语言英语考试。结论:学习者需要有机会谈论他们生活中文学的多重声音。这种谈话提供了一个不同的视角来看待文学如何丰富、破坏和扩展学习者对文学和他们自己的思考。这项研究与考试结果形成了对比,有助于建设一个读者国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信