A. Bell, K. Bartimote, Nora Dempsey, Lucy Mercer-Mapstone, Gulwanyang Moran, J. Tognolini
{"title":"Student and educator perspectives on equity and online work integrated learning","authors":"A. Bell, K. Bartimote, Nora Dempsey, Lucy Mercer-Mapstone, Gulwanyang Moran, J. Tognolini","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students from diverse backgrounds report that time pressures, financial responsibilities, caring commitments, and geographic location are barriers to their uptake of work integrated learning (WIL). Through interviews with 32 students and 15 educators who participated in online WIL, we investigated whether online WIL might be one way of overcoming these barriers. Benefits of online WIL for students included employability skills, meaningful work, affordability, and flexibility when coping with health issues. Challenges for students included missing out on workplace interactions, digital access, and finding a private space in which to work. Students from diverse backgrounds were viewed by educators as bringing positive contributions to the workplace. Educators found challenges in giving feedback and not being able to replicate some aspects of in-person workplaces. We conclude with recommendations on how online WIL might be enhanced to better meet the needs of students facing equity issues.\nImplications for practice and policy:\n\nAll participants in online WIL should be encouraged to intentionally view diversity as a strength.\nEducators need to create explicit opportunities for formal and informal interaction and network building during online WIL.\nEducators should provide engaging and purposeful work during online WIL.\nStudents may need additional financial or material support to undertake online WIL, for example to enable digital access and access to a private workspace.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Students from diverse backgrounds report that time pressures, financial responsibilities, caring commitments, and geographic location are barriers to their uptake of work integrated learning (WIL). Through interviews with 32 students and 15 educators who participated in online WIL, we investigated whether online WIL might be one way of overcoming these barriers. Benefits of online WIL for students included employability skills, meaningful work, affordability, and flexibility when coping with health issues. Challenges for students included missing out on workplace interactions, digital access, and finding a private space in which to work. Students from diverse backgrounds were viewed by educators as bringing positive contributions to the workplace. Educators found challenges in giving feedback and not being able to replicate some aspects of in-person workplaces. We conclude with recommendations on how online WIL might be enhanced to better meet the needs of students facing equity issues.
Implications for practice and policy:
All participants in online WIL should be encouraged to intentionally view diversity as a strength.
Educators need to create explicit opportunities for formal and informal interaction and network building during online WIL.
Educators should provide engaging and purposeful work during online WIL.
Students may need additional financial or material support to undertake online WIL, for example to enable digital access and access to a private workspace.