{"title":"Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Support Professional Growth","authors":"E. Wylie, Christine J. Lyon","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To promote and support teachers’ professional growth in using formative assessment practices in the classroom, we developed and piloted a suite of materials which consists of a set of rubrics for ten dimensions of formative assessment and six self-reflection/peer-observation tools. We describe the iterative development process, the design decisions and challenges, and the findings from an early pilot in which twenty-four educators from five states used the materials. We also report on a content validation study was conducted with seven subject matter experts who confirmed the importance of the ten formative assessment dimensions and did not identify any significant omissions. Finally we have preliminary findings from a group of teachers who engaged with a set of training modules to support their understanding of the rubrics before applying them to classroom practice through peer observation and feedback.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"25 1","pages":"314 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
ABSTRACT To promote and support teachers’ professional growth in using formative assessment practices in the classroom, we developed and piloted a suite of materials which consists of a set of rubrics for ten dimensions of formative assessment and six self-reflection/peer-observation tools. We describe the iterative development process, the design decisions and challenges, and the findings from an early pilot in which twenty-four educators from five states used the materials. We also report on a content validation study was conducted with seven subject matter experts who confirmed the importance of the ten formative assessment dimensions and did not identify any significant omissions. Finally we have preliminary findings from a group of teachers who engaged with a set of training modules to support their understanding of the rubrics before applying them to classroom practice through peer observation and feedback.
期刊介绍:
Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.