{"title":"Rethinking Salon Music: Case-Studies in Analysis","authors":"Anja Bunzel, S. Wollenberg","doi":"10.1017/S1479409821000495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nineteenth-century salon culture has received important attention in recent years with regard to examining the nature and function of the salon as an institution, together with notions of the salonesque. Social gatherings of this kind provided for the participants a semi-public, non-commercial and inclusive space. Typically music played a key role in the gatherings; however, the extent of its cultivation, and the compositional and technical degree of complexity involved, varied according to the individual circumstances. While, on the one hand, Robert Schumann in 1841 dismissed ‘salon music’ as too sentimental and intellectually dull, on the other hand Johann Christian Lobe warned in 1853 that we should not generalize about the music performed in salons. Lobe supported his plea by giving examples of salon music possessing more than ephemeral qualities: he instanced Schumann’s Kinderszenen, Beethoven’s Bagatelles, Weber’s Aufforderung zum Tanze Op. 65, Schubert’s marches for four-hand piano, and Mendelssohn’s Lieder ohne Worte. Lobe’s list and Schumann’s concerns point to two problems: first, the definition of ‘salon music’ is far from clear; and secondly, the range of aesthetic and technical aspects related to musical performance in salons is diffuse. Ballstaedt attempted to capture the nuances of the ‘serious’ and the ‘popular’within this context by differentiating between ‘music for the salon’, consisting of light-hearted music composed for the purpose of entertainment, and ‘music in salons’, encompassing all music which could be heard","PeriodicalId":41351,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479409821000495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nineteenth-century salon culture has received important attention in recent years with regard to examining the nature and function of the salon as an institution, together with notions of the salonesque. Social gatherings of this kind provided for the participants a semi-public, non-commercial and inclusive space. Typically music played a key role in the gatherings; however, the extent of its cultivation, and the compositional and technical degree of complexity involved, varied according to the individual circumstances. While, on the one hand, Robert Schumann in 1841 dismissed ‘salon music’ as too sentimental and intellectually dull, on the other hand Johann Christian Lobe warned in 1853 that we should not generalize about the music performed in salons. Lobe supported his plea by giving examples of salon music possessing more than ephemeral qualities: he instanced Schumann’s Kinderszenen, Beethoven’s Bagatelles, Weber’s Aufforderung zum Tanze Op. 65, Schubert’s marches for four-hand piano, and Mendelssohn’s Lieder ohne Worte. Lobe’s list and Schumann’s concerns point to two problems: first, the definition of ‘salon music’ is far from clear; and secondly, the range of aesthetic and technical aspects related to musical performance in salons is diffuse. Ballstaedt attempted to capture the nuances of the ‘serious’ and the ‘popular’within this context by differentiating between ‘music for the salon’, consisting of light-hearted music composed for the purpose of entertainment, and ‘music in salons’, encompassing all music which could be heard
近年来,19世纪沙龙文化受到了重要的关注,人们将沙龙作为一种机构的性质和功能,以及沙龙风格的概念进行了研究。这种社交聚会为参与者提供了一个半公共的、非商业的、包容的空间。通常,音乐在聚会中起着关键作用;然而,它的培养程度,以及所涉及的组成和技术复杂程度,根据个人情况而有所不同。一方面,罗伯特·舒曼(Robert Schumann)在1841年认为“沙龙音乐”过于煽情和智力迟钝,另一方面,约翰·克里斯蒂安·波勒(Johann Christian Lobe)在1853年警告说,我们不应该对沙龙演奏的音乐进行概括。为了支持他的请求,波勒列举了一些沙龙音乐的例子,这些音乐不仅仅具有短暂的品质:舒曼的《孩子》、贝多芬的《小小奏》、韦伯的《探泽曲》作品65、舒伯特的四手钢琴进行曲和门德尔松的《抒情》。波勒的名单和舒曼的担忧指向两个问题:首先,“沙龙音乐”的定义远不明确;其次,与沙龙音乐表演有关的美学和技术方面的范围是分散的。Ballstaedt试图通过区分“沙龙音乐”和“沙龙音乐”来捕捉“严肃”和“流行”之间的细微差别,“沙龙音乐”是指为娱乐目的而创作的轻松音乐,而“沙龙音乐”则包括所有可以听到的音乐