The Nature and Quality of Support from Informal Networks for Informal Caregivers of Low-Grade Glioma Patients: A Qualitative Analysis within the Ways Ahead Study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Andrew James Murrell, B. Rimmer, Lizzie Dutton, Joanne Lewis, R. Burns, P. Gallagher, Sophie Williams, V. Araújo-Soares, Tracy Finch, L. Sharp
{"title":"The Nature and Quality of Support from Informal Networks for Informal Caregivers of Low-Grade Glioma Patients: A Qualitative Analysis within the Ways Ahead Study","authors":"Andrew James Murrell, B. Rimmer, Lizzie Dutton, Joanne Lewis, R. Burns, P. Gallagher, Sophie Williams, V. Araújo-Soares, Tracy Finch, L. Sharp","doi":"10.1155/2023/4149412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. Those closest to the patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) often become informal caregivers (ICs). Caregiving demands can impact ICs’ wellbeing, meaning they themselves may require support. We explored the nature and quality of support from informal networks for ICs of LGG patients. Methods. In this cross-sectional qualitative study, semistructured interviews were conducted with individuals from the United Kingdom who currently, or in the past five years, informally cared for someone diagnosed with an LGG. Interviews explored ICs’ experiences of receiving support from informal networks. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Results. Nineteen ICs were interviewed (mean age 54.6 years; 5 males, 14 females). ICs received multiple forms of support from their informal networks: emotional (e.g., “opportunities to talk”), instrumental (e.g., “opportunities for relief”), information (e.g., “information from network contacts”), and appraisal (e.g., “comparisons with similar others”). Networks comprised strong/familiar (e.g., close friends) and weaker/unfamiliar (e.g., other ICs) ties. Supportive networks were perceived to help protect ICs’ wellbeing. Participants perceived challenges such as poor understanding and unsolicited advice to weaken the quality of support. Conclusion. Informal networks can provide wide-ranging support for ICs of the LGG patients. Different supports may be sought or provided from different contacts, highlighting the importance and value of extended networks.","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4149412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective. Those closest to the patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) often become informal caregivers (ICs). Caregiving demands can impact ICs’ wellbeing, meaning they themselves may require support. We explored the nature and quality of support from informal networks for ICs of LGG patients. Methods. In this cross-sectional qualitative study, semistructured interviews were conducted with individuals from the United Kingdom who currently, or in the past five years, informally cared for someone diagnosed with an LGG. Interviews explored ICs’ experiences of receiving support from informal networks. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Results. Nineteen ICs were interviewed (mean age 54.6 years; 5 males, 14 females). ICs received multiple forms of support from their informal networks: emotional (e.g., “opportunities to talk”), instrumental (e.g., “opportunities for relief”), information (e.g., “information from network contacts”), and appraisal (e.g., “comparisons with similar others”). Networks comprised strong/familiar (e.g., close friends) and weaker/unfamiliar (e.g., other ICs) ties. Supportive networks were perceived to help protect ICs’ wellbeing. Participants perceived challenges such as poor understanding and unsolicited advice to weaken the quality of support. Conclusion. Informal networks can provide wide-ranging support for ICs of the LGG patients. Different supports may be sought or provided from different contacts, highlighting the importance and value of extended networks.
低级别胶质瘤患者非正式护理人员非正式网络支持的性质和质量:前瞻性研究中的定性分析
客观的那些与低级别胶质瘤(LGG)患者关系最密切的人往往成为非正式的照顾者(IC)。照顾需求会影响重症监护室的健康,这意味着他们自己可能需要支持。我们探讨了LGG患者ICs非正式网络支持的性质和质量。方法。在这项横断面定性研究中,对目前或过去五年中非正式照顾被诊断为LGG的英国人进行了半结构访谈。访谈探讨了ICs从非正式网络获得支持的经验。进行了专题分析。后果访谈了19名ICs(平均年龄54.6岁 年;5名男性、14名女性)。ICs从其非正式网络获得了多种形式的支持:情感支持(例如,“交谈的机会”)、工具支持(例如:“解脱的机会”。网络包括强大/熟悉(例如,亲密的朋友)和较弱/陌生(例如,其他IC)的联系。支持性网络被认为有助于保护ICs的健康。与会者认为存在理解能力差和主动提出建议等挑战,从而削弱了支持的质量。结论非正式网络可以为LGG患者的ICU提供广泛的支持。可以从不同的联系人寻求或提供不同的支持,突出扩展网络的重要性和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信