EFFECTIVENESS OF SAMPLING METHODS FOR THINNED AND NON-THINNED Pinus taeda L. PLANTATIONS IN THE MOUNTAIN REGION OF SANTA CATARINA, BRAZIL

Q4 Environmental Science
Floresta Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI:10.5380/rf.v52i4.85374
Thaila Heberle, Lucas Denega, T. F. Stepka, Marcos Filipe Nicoletti, Guilherme Galéski, Leonardo Dos Santos De Jesus
{"title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF SAMPLING METHODS FOR THINNED AND NON-THINNED Pinus taeda L. PLANTATIONS IN THE MOUNTAIN REGION OF SANTA CATARINA, BRAZIL","authors":"Thaila Heberle, Lucas Denega, T. F. Stepka, Marcos Filipe Nicoletti, Guilherme Galéski, Leonardo Dos Santos De Jesus","doi":"10.5380/rf.v52i4.85374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Brazil, most forest inventories by sampling use the fixed-area method, even though there are other alternatives methods developed since the 1940s. Research demonstrating the effectiveness of variable-area sampling methods is scarce, especially in forest plantations that advocate thinning throughout the production cycle. This study aimed to test different sampling methods of fixed (400 m² circular) and variable (Bitterlich and Strand) areas in a forest inventory in 9-year-old Pinus taeda L. plantations with 9 years without thinning and 14 years with thinning, comparing with the total enumeration of areas. The results obtained from the variables Number of Trees per hectare (N ha-1), Basal Area per hectare (G ha-1) and Volume per hectare (V ha-1) were submitted to a test of average comparison following a completely randomized design for each plantation and the differences observed were detected with the Scott-Knott test at 95% probability. It was evidenced that the Strand method presented greater accuracy for estimating all analyzed variables, especially in the area with thinning, however, it is necessary to increase the sampling intensity to guarantee precision in all cases. The fixed area method showed results consistent with the census for N ha-1 and presented overestimates in the area without thinning and underestimations in the area with thinning for Gha-1 and Vha-1.","PeriodicalId":53573,"journal":{"name":"Floresta","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Floresta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v52i4.85374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brazil, most forest inventories by sampling use the fixed-area method, even though there are other alternatives methods developed since the 1940s. Research demonstrating the effectiveness of variable-area sampling methods is scarce, especially in forest plantations that advocate thinning throughout the production cycle. This study aimed to test different sampling methods of fixed (400 m² circular) and variable (Bitterlich and Strand) areas in a forest inventory in 9-year-old Pinus taeda L. plantations with 9 years without thinning and 14 years with thinning, comparing with the total enumeration of areas. The results obtained from the variables Number of Trees per hectare (N ha-1), Basal Area per hectare (G ha-1) and Volume per hectare (V ha-1) were submitted to a test of average comparison following a completely randomized design for each plantation and the differences observed were detected with the Scott-Knott test at 95% probability. It was evidenced that the Strand method presented greater accuracy for estimating all analyzed variables, especially in the area with thinning, however, it is necessary to increase the sampling intensity to guarantee precision in all cases. The fixed area method showed results consistent with the census for N ha-1 and presented overestimates in the area without thinning and underestimations in the area with thinning for Gha-1 and Vha-1.
巴西圣卡塔琳娜山区松林和非松林取样方法的有效性
在巴西,虽然自1940年代以来发展了其他替代方法,但通过抽样进行的大多数森林清查都使用固定面积法。证明变面积采样方法有效性的研究很少,特别是在主张在整个生产周期中疏伐的人工林中。本研究以9年生针叶松人工林为研究对象,对固定面积(400 m²圆形)和可变面积(Bitterlich和Strand)的不同采样方法进行了研究,其中9年未间伐和14年间伐,并与总采样面积进行了比较。每公顷乔木数(N ha-1)、每公顷基底面积(G ha-1)和每公顷体积(V ha-1)的结果采用完全随机设计对每个人工林进行平均比较检验,观察到的差异采用95%概率的Scott-Knott检验。实验证明,Strand方法对所有分析变量的估计精度较高,特别是在变薄区域,但需要增加采样强度以保证所有情况下的精度。固定面积法对N ha-1的估算结果与普查结果一致,但对ga -1和Vha-1的估算结果在未疏伐的区域存在高估,在疏伐的区域存在低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Floresta
Floresta Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Revista Floresta admits articles of scientific contribution in Forest Science, in the areas of Nature Conservation, Economy and Forest Policy, Forest Management, Silviculture and Wood Technology. The main task is to promote and divulgate the development of Forest Science in Brazil and in the world. Articles published in Revista Floresta are under total responsibility of the authors, who are aware that they are original studies. It remains implicit that articles were not submitted for publication to any other divulgation media. It remains explicit the agreement of authors to norms of the journal and, along the development of their work, the observance of ethic aspects and respect of the current copyright legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书