Measuring academic learning and exam self-efficacy at admission to university and its relation to first-year attrition

T. Nielsen, I. S. Friderichsen, Bjarke Tarpgaard Hartkopf
{"title":"Measuring academic learning and exam self-efficacy at admission to university and its relation to first-year attrition","authors":"T. Nielsen, I. S. Friderichsen, Bjarke Tarpgaard Hartkopf","doi":"10.14786/flr.v7i3.503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-efficacy is associated with both academic performance and attrition in higher education. Whether it is possible to measure students’ academic self-efficacy after admission and prior to commencing higher education (i.e. pre-academic self-efficacy) in a valid and reliable way has hardly been studied. Aims: 1) to evaluate the construct validity and psychometric properties of two short scales to measure Pre-Academic Learning Self-Efficacy (PAL-SE) and Pre-Academic Exam Self-Efficacy (PAE-SE) using Rasch measurement models, 2) to investigate whether pre-academic self-efficacy was associated with half-year attrition across degree programs and institutions. Data consisted of 2686 Danish students admitted to nine different university degree programs across two institutions. Item analyses showed both scales to be essentially objective and construct valid, however, all items from the PAE-SE and two from the PAL-SE were locally dependent. Differential item functioning was found for the PAL-SE  relative to degree programs. Reliability of the PAE-SE was .77, and varied for the PAL-SE  from .79 to .86 across degree programs. Targeting was good only for the PAL-SE, thus we proceeded with the PAL-SE. PAL-SE was found to be associated with half-year attrition: A difference in PAL-SE from minimum to maximum was associated with a difference in half-year attrition of approximately 7%. This association was found both in the bivariate model and in the multivariate models with control of degree program, and with control of degree program and individual covariates such as earlier educational achievement and social background variables. Results thus also indicate that PAL-SE has a causal effect on half-year attrition.","PeriodicalId":37057,"journal":{"name":"Frontline Learning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontline Learning Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v7i3.503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Self-efficacy is associated with both academic performance and attrition in higher education. Whether it is possible to measure students’ academic self-efficacy after admission and prior to commencing higher education (i.e. pre-academic self-efficacy) in a valid and reliable way has hardly been studied. Aims: 1) to evaluate the construct validity and psychometric properties of two short scales to measure Pre-Academic Learning Self-Efficacy (PAL-SE) and Pre-Academic Exam Self-Efficacy (PAE-SE) using Rasch measurement models, 2) to investigate whether pre-academic self-efficacy was associated with half-year attrition across degree programs and institutions. Data consisted of 2686 Danish students admitted to nine different university degree programs across two institutions. Item analyses showed both scales to be essentially objective and construct valid, however, all items from the PAE-SE and two from the PAL-SE were locally dependent. Differential item functioning was found for the PAL-SE  relative to degree programs. Reliability of the PAE-SE was .77, and varied for the PAL-SE  from .79 to .86 across degree programs. Targeting was good only for the PAL-SE, thus we proceeded with the PAL-SE. PAL-SE was found to be associated with half-year attrition: A difference in PAL-SE from minimum to maximum was associated with a difference in half-year attrition of approximately 7%. This association was found both in the bivariate model and in the multivariate models with control of degree program, and with control of degree program and individual covariates such as earlier educational achievement and social background variables. Results thus also indicate that PAL-SE has a causal effect on half-year attrition.
大学入学学业和考试自我效能感的测量及其与第一年损耗的关系
在高等教育中,自我效能感与学习成绩和流失都有关系。能否有效、可靠地测量学生在入学后和开始接受高等教育之前的学业自我效能感(即学业前自我效能感),目前还鲜有研究。目的:1)利用Rasch测量模型评估学业前学习自我效能(PAL-SE)和学业前考试自我效能(PAE-SE)两种短量表的构念效度和心理测量学性质;2)探讨学业前自我效能是否与学位和院校的半年磨耗有关。数据包括2686名丹麦学生,他们被两所机构的9个不同的大学学位项目录取。项目分析显示,这两个量表基本上都是客观有效的,然而,PAE-SE的所有项目和PAL-SE的两个项目都是局部依赖的。PAL-SE的项目功能存在与学位课程相关的差异。PAE-SE的信度为0.77,PAL-SE的信度在不同学位之间从0.79到0.86不等。靶标只对PAL-SE有效,因此我们继续使用PAL-SE。PAL-SE被发现与半年损耗有关:PAL-SE从最小到最大的差异与大约7%的半年损耗差异有关。在双变量模型和控制学位项目的多变量模型中,以及在控制学位项目和个体协变量(如早期教育成就和社会背景变量)的模型中,都发现了这种关联。结果也表明PAL-SE对半年磨耗有因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontline Learning Research
Frontline Learning Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信