Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law

IF 0.9 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Informal Logic Pub Date : 2020-08-29 DOI:10.22329/il.v40i30.6002

M. Novak

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses how an understanding of Jung's psychological types is important for the relevance of Gilbert's multi-modal argumentation theory. Moreover, it highlights how the types have been confirmed by contemporary neuroscience and cognitive psychology. Based on Gilbert's approach, I extend multi-modal argumentation to the area of legal argumentation. It seems that when we leave behind the traditional fortress of “logical” legal argumentation, we "discover" alternate modes (such as the intuitive, emotional, and sensory) that have always been present, concealed in the theoretically underestimated rhetorical skills of arguers.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在荣格身上扎根吉尔伯特的多模态论证及其在法律上的延伸

本文讨论了对荣格的心理类型的理解对于吉尔伯特的多模态论证理论的相关性的重要性。此外，它强调了这些类型是如何被当代神经科学和认知心理学所证实的。在吉尔伯特方法的基础上，我将多模态论证扩展到法律论证领域。当我们离开传统的“逻辑”法律论证堡垒时，我们似乎“发现”了一直存在的替代模式(如直觉、情感和感官)，这些模式隐藏在理论上被低估的辩论者的修辞技巧中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Informal Logic PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Informal Logic publishes articles that advance the dialectic in reasoning and argumentation theory and practice. Primary criteria for the acceptance of articles with a theoretical focus or interest are: (1) the article advances the dialectic or constitutes an interesting comment on it: it presents a cogent argument, objection, interpretation or position that is an advance in relation to the background of issues and controversies on the topic; or it casts the issue addressed in a new and worthwhile light; and (2) the article makes explicit reference to the pertinent literature on its topic, and it discharges the burden of proof imposed by that scholarship. Primary criteria for acceptance of articles devoted to the teaching of informal logic, critical thinking or argumentation include: originality; utility; timeliness; and evidence of the effectiveness of the methods, materials, technologies, etc., proposed. The standard criteria for scholarly publication—topical fit with the subjects covered in the journal; adequacy of coverage to the issue addressed; clarity, organization and literateness of the prose; conceptual clarity and cogency of argumentation—apply ceteris paribus to the selection of all articles, notes and reviews.