Changes in aroma compounds of decaffeinated coffee beans

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Jin-Young Lee, Young-Soo Kim
{"title":"Changes in aroma compounds of decaffeinated coffee\n beans","authors":"Jin-Young Lee, Young-Soo Kim","doi":"10.11002/kjfp.2023.30.3.492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n In this study, we wanted to understand the impact of different decaffeination\n processes on aroma compounds of coffee. Therefore, we analyzed differences in\n physical characteristics and volatile aroma compounds profiles of regular coffee\n (RC), Swiss water process decaffeinated coffee (SWDC), and supercritical\n CO2 decaffeinated coffee (SCDC) after roasting the coffee beans.\n The electronic nose analysis identified RC and SCDC as different groups which\n indicates that these groups volatile aroma compound compositions were different.\n The principal component analysis of volatile compound patterns identified using\n an electronic nose indicated that there was a large difference in volatile\n compounds between RC, which was not decaffeinated, and both decaffeinated SWDC\n and SCDC. The major aroma compounds of RC, SWDC and SCDC were propan-2-one and\n hexan-2-one which are ketone, and hexanal and (E)-2-pentenal which are aldehyde\n and 3-methyl-1-butanol which is an alcohol. After roasting, the composition of\n major volatile compounds appearing in the beans was similar, but the relative\n odor intensity was different. We identified 28 volatile aroma compounds from RC,\n SWDC, and SCDC using headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas\n chromatography/mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC/MS), and analyzed 10 major\n compounds that were present in high abundance, including furfural,\n 2-furanmethanol, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, and 2-ethyl-3-methylpyrazine.\n","PeriodicalId":17875,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2023.30.3.492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we wanted to understand the impact of different decaffeination processes on aroma compounds of coffee. Therefore, we analyzed differences in physical characteristics and volatile aroma compounds profiles of regular coffee (RC), Swiss water process decaffeinated coffee (SWDC), and supercritical CO2 decaffeinated coffee (SCDC) after roasting the coffee beans. The electronic nose analysis identified RC and SCDC as different groups which indicates that these groups volatile aroma compound compositions were different. The principal component analysis of volatile compound patterns identified using an electronic nose indicated that there was a large difference in volatile compounds between RC, which was not decaffeinated, and both decaffeinated SWDC and SCDC. The major aroma compounds of RC, SWDC and SCDC were propan-2-one and hexan-2-one which are ketone, and hexanal and (E)-2-pentenal which are aldehyde and 3-methyl-1-butanol which is an alcohol. After roasting, the composition of major volatile compounds appearing in the beans was similar, but the relative odor intensity was different. We identified 28 volatile aroma compounds from RC, SWDC, and SCDC using headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC/MS), and analyzed 10 major compounds that were present in high abundance, including furfural, 2-furanmethanol, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, and 2-ethyl-3-methylpyrazine.
脱咖啡因咖啡豆香气成分的变化
在这项研究中,我们想了解不同的脱咖啡因过程对咖啡香气化合物的影响。因此,我们分析了普通咖啡(RC)、瑞士水处理脱咖啡因咖啡(SWDC)和超临界CO2脱咖啡因咖啡在烘焙咖啡豆后的物理特性和挥发性香气成分特征的差异。电子鼻分析表明RC和SCDC为不同的组分,说明这两组分的挥发性香气成分不同。使用电子鼻识别的挥发性化合物模式的主成分分析表明,未脱咖啡因的RC与脱咖啡因的SWDC和SCDC之间的挥发性化合物存在很大差异。RC、SWDC和SCDC的主要香气化合物是酮的丙-2-酮和己-2-酮,以及醛的己醛和(E)-2-戊烯醛和醇的3-甲基-1-丁醇。烘烤后,豆中主要挥发性物质的组成相似,但相对气味强度不同。我们使用顶空固相微萃取气相色谱/质谱法(HS-SPME-GC/MS)从RC、SWDC和SCDC中鉴定了28种挥发性香气化合物,并分析了10种高丰度的主要化合物,包括糠醛、2-呋喃甲醇、2,5-二甲基吡嗪和2-乙基-3-甲基吡嗪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Food Preservation
Korean Journal of Food Preservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote and encourage the advancement of quantitative improvement for the storage, processing and distribution of food and its related disciplines, theory and research on its application. Topics covered include: Food Preservation and Packaging Food and Food Material distribution Fresh-cut Food Manufacturing Food processing Technology Food Functional Properties Food Quality / Safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信