Establishment and application of an anisotropic shale rock physical model in the observation coordinate system

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Jun-Chuan Gui, Yu Sang, Jian-Chun Guo, Bo Zeng, Yi Song, Hao-Yong Huang, Er-si Xu, Ya-xi Chen
{"title":"Establishment and application of an anisotropic shale rock physical model in the observation coordinate system","authors":"Jun-Chuan Gui,&nbsp;Yu Sang,&nbsp;Jian-Chun Guo,&nbsp;Bo Zeng,&nbsp;Yi Song,&nbsp;Hao-Yong Huang,&nbsp;Er-si Xu,&nbsp;Ya-xi Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11770-022-0998-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>No shale-rock physical model has been established in the observation coordinate system. To this end, this paper carried out anisotropic wave velocity tests on shale rock and compared the Thomsen, Daley, and Berryman solutions to characterize anisotropic acoustic wave velocity. Finally, the Daley solution was selected. Based on basic rock physical models, such as SCA and DEM methods, and combined with the Daley solution, an anisotropic shalerock physical model was established in the observation coordinate system and applied in Well B1 in the Luzhou area, Sichuan Basin. Our research conclusions were as follows: 1. for the samples from the same core, the P-wave velocities in three directions were in the order <i>V</i><sub>P11</sub> &gt;<i>V</i><sub>P45</sub> &gt;<i>V</i><sub>P33</sub>, shear-wave velocity <i>V</i><sub>S11</sub> was the largest, but <i>V</i><sub>S33</sub> and <i>V</i><sub>S45</sub> did not follow the law of <i>V</i><sub>s33</sub> &gt;<i>V</i><sub>s45</sub> for some samples; 2. the Daley solution, which not only considers the accuracy requirements but also has a complete expression of P-, SV-, and SH-waves, is most suitable for characterization of anisotropic wave velocity in this study area; 3. the rock physical model constructed in the observation coordinate system has high accuracy, in which the absolute value of the relative error of the P-wave slowness was between 0% and 5.05% (0.55% on average), and that of shear-wave slowness was between 0% and 6.05% (0.59% on average); 4. the acoustic waves recorded in Well B1 in the observation coordinate system were very different from those in the constitutive coordinate system. The relative difference of the P-wave was between 6.76% and 30.84% (14.68% on average), and that of the S-wave was between 7.00% and 23.44% (13.99% on average). The acoustic slowness measured in the observation coordinate system, such as in a deviated well or a horizontal well section, must be converted to the constitutive coordinate system before it can be used in subsequent engineering applications; 5. the anisotropic shale-rock physical model built in the observation coordinate system proposed in this paper can provide basic data and guidance for subsequent pore pressure prediction, geomechanical modeling, and fracturing stimulation design for deviated and horizontal wells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55500,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geophysics","volume":"19 3","pages":"325 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11770-022-0998-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11770-022-0998-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No shale-rock physical model has been established in the observation coordinate system. To this end, this paper carried out anisotropic wave velocity tests on shale rock and compared the Thomsen, Daley, and Berryman solutions to characterize anisotropic acoustic wave velocity. Finally, the Daley solution was selected. Based on basic rock physical models, such as SCA and DEM methods, and combined with the Daley solution, an anisotropic shalerock physical model was established in the observation coordinate system and applied in Well B1 in the Luzhou area, Sichuan Basin. Our research conclusions were as follows: 1. for the samples from the same core, the P-wave velocities in three directions were in the order VP11 >VP45 >VP33, shear-wave velocity VS11 was the largest, but VS33 and VS45 did not follow the law of Vs33 >Vs45 for some samples; 2. the Daley solution, which not only considers the accuracy requirements but also has a complete expression of P-, SV-, and SH-waves, is most suitable for characterization of anisotropic wave velocity in this study area; 3. the rock physical model constructed in the observation coordinate system has high accuracy, in which the absolute value of the relative error of the P-wave slowness was between 0% and 5.05% (0.55% on average), and that of shear-wave slowness was between 0% and 6.05% (0.59% on average); 4. the acoustic waves recorded in Well B1 in the observation coordinate system were very different from those in the constitutive coordinate system. The relative difference of the P-wave was between 6.76% and 30.84% (14.68% on average), and that of the S-wave was between 7.00% and 23.44% (13.99% on average). The acoustic slowness measured in the observation coordinate system, such as in a deviated well or a horizontal well section, must be converted to the constitutive coordinate system before it can be used in subsequent engineering applications; 5. the anisotropic shale-rock physical model built in the observation coordinate system proposed in this paper can provide basic data and guidance for subsequent pore pressure prediction, geomechanical modeling, and fracturing stimulation design for deviated and horizontal wells.

各向异性页岩物理模型在观测坐标系中的建立与应用
在观测坐标系中未建立页岩物理模型。为此,本文对页岩进行了各向异性波速测试,并对Thomsen、Daley和Berryman三种解法进行了比较,表征了各向异性波速。最后选择了Daley解。以SCA、DEM等基本岩石物理模型为基础,结合Daley解,建立了观测坐标系下的各向异性浅层岩石物理模型,并应用于四川盆地泸州地区B1井。我们的研究结论如下:1。同一岩心样品三个方向的纵波速度顺序为VP11 >VP45 >VP33,其中横波速度VS11最大,但部分样品的VS33和VS45不符合VS33 > VS45的规律;2. Daley解既考虑了精度要求,又完整地表达了P-波、SV-波和sh -波,最适合表征本研究区各向异性波速;3.在观测坐标系下建立的岩石物理模型精度较高,其中纵波慢度相对误差绝对值在0% ~ 5.05%之间(平均为0.55%),横波慢度相对误差绝对值在0% ~ 6.05%之间(平均为0.59%);4. 观测坐标系下B1井记录的声波与本构坐标系下记录的声波差异很大。p波相对差值为6.76% ~ 30.84%(平均14.68%),s波相对差值为7.00% ~ 23.44%(平均13.99%)。在斜井或水平井段等观测坐标系中测量到的声慢度,必须转换为本构坐标系,才能用于后续的工程应用;5. 在观测坐标系下建立的各向异性页岩物理模型可为后续的孔隙压力预测、地质力学建模以及斜井和水平井压裂增产设计提供基础数据和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geophysics
Applied Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
912
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The journal is designed to provide an academic realm for a broad blend of academic and industry papers to promote rapid communication and exchange of ideas between Chinese and world-wide geophysicists. The publication covers the applications of geoscience, geophysics, and related disciplines in the fields of energy, resources, environment, disaster, engineering, information, military, and surveying.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信