Roles of positive and indirect negative evidence in L2 feature reassembly

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Woramon Prawatmuang, Boping Yuan
{"title":"Roles of positive and indirect negative evidence in L2 feature reassembly","authors":"Woramon Prawatmuang, Boping Yuan","doi":"10.1075/jsls.00011.pra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article reports an empirical study investigating L2 acquisition of the Mandarin Chinese collective marker\n -men by adult Thai-speaking learners and the Thai collective marker phûak- by adult\n Chinese-speaking learners within the framework of the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis (Lardiere,\n 2009a, 2009b). An acceptability judgment test was administered to learners\n with beginning, intermediate and advanced proficiencies of Chinese and Thai (n = 114) as well as native speaker\n controls (n = 30). The results reveal a facilitating role of positive evidence in L2 feature reassembly as\n Chinese learners who are exposed to positive evidence of “phûak + animal noun” and “phûak +\n indefinite noun” structures in their Thai input perform native-like on these structures from an intermediate level onward. On the\n other hand, feature reassembly is hindered when positive evidence is unavailable as in the case of Thai learners of Chinese where\n no evidence they receive in the input shows ungrammaticality of “animal noun + men” and “indefinite noun +\n men” structures in Chinese. These learners mostly fail to perform native-like even at an advanced level.","PeriodicalId":29903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00011.pra","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article reports an empirical study investigating L2 acquisition of the Mandarin Chinese collective marker -men by adult Thai-speaking learners and the Thai collective marker phûak- by adult Chinese-speaking learners within the framework of the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis (Lardiere, 2009a, 2009b). An acceptability judgment test was administered to learners with beginning, intermediate and advanced proficiencies of Chinese and Thai (n = 114) as well as native speaker controls (n = 30). The results reveal a facilitating role of positive evidence in L2 feature reassembly as Chinese learners who are exposed to positive evidence of “phûak + animal noun” and “phûak + indefinite noun” structures in their Thai input perform native-like on these structures from an intermediate level onward. On the other hand, feature reassembly is hindered when positive evidence is unavailable as in the case of Thai learners of Chinese where no evidence they receive in the input shows ungrammaticality of “animal noun + men” and “indefinite noun + men” structures in Chinese. These learners mostly fail to perform native-like even at an advanced level.
积极和间接消极证据在二语特征重组中的作用
本文在特征重组假说(Lardiere,2009a,2009b)的框架内,对成年泰语学习者对普通话集体标记man-man和成年汉语学习者对泰语集体标记phuâak的二语习得进行了实证研究。对汉语和泰语初级、中级和高级熟练的学习者进行可接受性判断测试(n = 114)以及母语使用者控制(n = 30)。研究结果表明,积极证据在二语特征重组中起着促进作用,因为在泰语输入中暴露于“phuõak+动物名词”和“phuïak+不定名词”结构的积极证据的中国学习者从中等水平开始在这些结构上表现得像母语。另一方面,当没有积极证据时,特征重组会受到阻碍,比如泰国汉语学习者的情况,他们在输入中没有收到任何证据表明汉语中“动物名词+男性”和“不定名词+女性”结构不符合语法。这些学习者大多表现得不像本地人,即使是在高级水平上也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信