PEDAGOGICAL DOCTORAL STUDENTS IN CHINA UNDER PRESSURE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CSSCI JOURNALS

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ming Guan, Xiaodong Fan, Jiao Li
{"title":"PEDAGOGICAL DOCTORAL STUDENTS IN CHINA UNDER PRESSURE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CSSCI JOURNALS","authors":"Ming Guan, Xiaodong Fan, Jiao Li","doi":"10.33225/pec/23.81.449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prerequisite for doctoral students in Chinese universities to obtain their degrees was to publish a certain number of papers in designated journals, which is the main pressure on doctoral students in China. This study focused on the publication pressure of doctoral students in pedagogy in China under the policy of breaking the ‘five only’, which aims to diversify the evaluation criteria for academic quality and reduce the reliance on paper publications. The study analyzed the data of 36 pedagogical CSSCI journals from 2016 to 2020, and examined the trends and patterns of publishing pedagogy articles in these journals. The study also explored the factors that influence the publication pressure of doctoral students in pedagogy, such as the admission system, the expansion of doctoral enrollment, and the recruitment system for young teachers. The results show that Chinese pedagogy CSSCI journals are declining in number and are dominated by well-known scholars and institutions. Doctoral students in pedagogy face a more severe academic situation than university teachers, as they have to publish papers to graduate and compete for limited journal space. They also face the pressure of publication under the application-appraisal system and the system of “promote or leave”. The study suggests that colleges and universities need to break through the quantitative evaluation system of doctoral students’ academic achievements and pay more attention to the training system and academic culture that promote their physical and mental health and academic development.\nKeywords: breaking the ‘five only’, CSSCI journals, data statistics, pedagogical doctoral students in China, publication pressure","PeriodicalId":44900,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Education in the 21st Century","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Education in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prerequisite for doctoral students in Chinese universities to obtain their degrees was to publish a certain number of papers in designated journals, which is the main pressure on doctoral students in China. This study focused on the publication pressure of doctoral students in pedagogy in China under the policy of breaking the ‘five only’, which aims to diversify the evaluation criteria for academic quality and reduce the reliance on paper publications. The study analyzed the data of 36 pedagogical CSSCI journals from 2016 to 2020, and examined the trends and patterns of publishing pedagogy articles in these journals. The study also explored the factors that influence the publication pressure of doctoral students in pedagogy, such as the admission system, the expansion of doctoral enrollment, and the recruitment system for young teachers. The results show that Chinese pedagogy CSSCI journals are declining in number and are dominated by well-known scholars and institutions. Doctoral students in pedagogy face a more severe academic situation than university teachers, as they have to publish papers to graduate and compete for limited journal space. They also face the pressure of publication under the application-appraisal system and the system of “promote or leave”. The study suggests that colleges and universities need to break through the quantitative evaluation system of doctoral students’ academic achievements and pay more attention to the training system and academic culture that promote their physical and mental health and academic development. Keywords: breaking the ‘five only’, CSSCI journals, data statistics, pedagogical doctoral students in China, publication pressure
压力下的中国教育学博士生&CSSCI期刊的实证分析
中国大学博士生获得学位的前提是在指定期刊上发表一定数量的论文,这是中国博士生面临的主要压力。本研究关注的是打破“五唯”政策下中国教育学博士生的出版压力,旨在使学术质量的评价标准多样化,减少对纸质出版物的依赖。该研究分析了2016年至2020年36份CSSCI教育学期刊的数据,并考察了这些期刊上发表教育学文章的趋势和模式。本研究还探讨了影响教育学博士生出版压力的因素,如录取制度、博士生扩招和青年教师招聘制度。研究结果表明,中国教育学CSSCI期刊数量呈下降趋势,且以知名学者和机构为主。教育学博士生面临着比大学教师更严峻的学术形势,因为他们必须发表论文才能毕业,并争夺有限的期刊空间。他们还面临着申请评估制度和“晋升或离职”制度下的出版压力。研究表明,高校需要突破博士生学业成绩的量化评价体系,更加重视促进其身心健康和学业发展的培养体系和学术文化。关键词:破“五唯”,CSSCI期刊,数据统计,中国教育学博士生,出版压力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Problems of Education in the 21st Century
Problems of Education in the 21st Century EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Problems of Education in the 21st Century is an international, periodical scientific journal publishing original research across the whole of education. The journal''s Editorial Board and staff are committed to building PEC into the leading scientific journal in its field by publishing articles of outstanding scientific quality that merit the attention and interest of the whole educational community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信