Dementia-friendliness – Inclusion or exclusion: A critical discourse analysis

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Tania Ea Hansen, M. Andresen, Jeanette Præstegaard, T. Tjørnhøj‐Thomsen, B. Nørgaard
{"title":"Dementia-friendliness – Inclusion or exclusion: A critical discourse analysis","authors":"Tania Ea Hansen, M. Andresen, Jeanette Præstegaard, T. Tjørnhøj‐Thomsen, B. Nørgaard","doi":"10.1177/14713012221101240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how individuals with dementia and their relatives discursively construct dementia-friendliness in a situation where different definitions of this term exists. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted, including seven individual interviews with people living with dementia. The remaining six interviews consisted of three interviews with the relatives of a person with dementia and three with married couples of which one were diagnosed with dementia. Notes taken by the first author during 6 months of fieldwork at a day centre and a drop-in centre for people with dementia and their families were used to supplement the interviews. Critical discourse analysis provides an analytical tool for revealing the discourses constructing dementia-friendliness. The analysis revealed that people with dementia and their relatives draw on the three discourses of sameness, security and care and autonomy during their attempts to construct dementia-friendliness. The ensuing discursive battles over dementia-friendliness appear to constitute a tightrope walk between the inclusion and exclusion of people with dementia, which underscores the importance of including the voices of people living with dementia when dementia-friendly initiatives and communities are developed.","PeriodicalId":51413,"journal":{"name":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012221101240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how individuals with dementia and their relatives discursively construct dementia-friendliness in a situation where different definitions of this term exists. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted, including seven individual interviews with people living with dementia. The remaining six interviews consisted of three interviews with the relatives of a person with dementia and three with married couples of which one were diagnosed with dementia. Notes taken by the first author during 6 months of fieldwork at a day centre and a drop-in centre for people with dementia and their families were used to supplement the interviews. Critical discourse analysis provides an analytical tool for revealing the discourses constructing dementia-friendliness. The analysis revealed that people with dementia and their relatives draw on the three discourses of sameness, security and care and autonomy during their attempts to construct dementia-friendliness. The ensuing discursive battles over dementia-friendliness appear to constitute a tightrope walk between the inclusion and exclusion of people with dementia, which underscores the importance of including the voices of people living with dementia when dementia-friendly initiatives and communities are developed.
痴呆症友好-包容或排斥:批评性话语分析
这篇文章探讨了个体与痴呆症和他们的亲属如何话语构建痴呆友好的情况下,这个术语存在不同的定义。他们进行了13次半结构化访谈,其中包括7次对痴呆症患者的个人访谈。剩下的六次访谈包括三次与痴呆症患者的亲属的访谈和三次与已婚夫妇的访谈,其中一人被诊断患有痴呆症。第一作者在一个日间中心和一个痴呆症患者及其家人的临时中心进行了为期6个月的实地工作,所做的笔记被用来补充访谈。批判性话语分析为揭示构建痴呆症友好型的话语提供了分析工具。分析表明,痴呆症患者及其亲属在试图构建痴呆症友好关系时,利用了同一性、安全性、关怀和自主性这三种话语。随后围绕痴呆症友好问题展开的争论似乎在包容和排斥痴呆症患者之间走钢丝,这凸显了在发展痴呆症友好倡议和社区时,纳入痴呆症患者声音的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Dementia acts as a major forum for social research of direct relevance to improving the quality of life and quality of care for people with dementia and their families. For the first time an international research journal is available for academics and practitioners that has as its primary paradigm the lived experience of dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信