Clinical frailty scale as a predictor of disease severity in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 – an observational cohort study

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Gustav Mattsson, Margareta Gonzalez Lindh, R. Razmi, Mia Forslin, F. Parenmark, A. Bandert, C. Ehrenborg, A. Palm
{"title":"Clinical frailty scale as a predictor of disease severity in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 – an observational cohort study","authors":"Gustav Mattsson, Margareta Gonzalez Lindh, R. Razmi, Mia Forslin, F. Parenmark, A. Bandert, C. Ehrenborg, A. Palm","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2022.2060304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic makes proper resource allocation and prioritisation important. Frailty increases the risk of adverse outcomes and can be quantified using the Clinical frailty scale. The aim of this study was to determine the role of the Clinical frailty scale, in patients ≥65 years of age with coronavirus disease 2019, as a risk factor either for critical coronavirus disease 2019 measured as intensive care unit admission or death or as a risk factor for death. Methods This was a retrospective observational study on patients ≥65 years hospitalised with coronavirus disease 2019 verified by polymerase chain reaction between 5 March 5 and 5 July 2020. The association between Clinical frailty scale and the composite primary outcome intensive care unit admission or death within 30 days post hospitalisation and the secondary outcome death within 30 days post hospitalisation was analysed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for gender, age, body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes. Clinical frailty scale was used as a categorical variable (fit score 1–4, frail score 5–6, and severely frail score 7–9). Results In total, 169 patients were included (47.3% women, mean age 79.2 ± 7.8 years). In the fully adjusted model, adjusted odds ratio for intensive care unit admission or death was 1.84 (95%-confidence interval 0.67–5.03, p = .234) for frail and 6.08 (1.70–21.81, p = .006) for severely frail compared to fit patients. For death, adjusted odds ratio was 2.81 (0.89–8.88, p = .079) for frail and 9.82 (2.53–38.10, p = .001) for severely frail compared to fit patients. Conclusions A high Clinical frailty scale score was an independent risk factor for the composite outcome intensive care unit admission or death and for the secondary outcome death.","PeriodicalId":13671,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases","volume":"54 1","pages":"583 - 590"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2022.2060304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic makes proper resource allocation and prioritisation important. Frailty increases the risk of adverse outcomes and can be quantified using the Clinical frailty scale. The aim of this study was to determine the role of the Clinical frailty scale, in patients ≥65 years of age with coronavirus disease 2019, as a risk factor either for critical coronavirus disease 2019 measured as intensive care unit admission or death or as a risk factor for death. Methods This was a retrospective observational study on patients ≥65 years hospitalised with coronavirus disease 2019 verified by polymerase chain reaction between 5 March 5 and 5 July 2020. The association between Clinical frailty scale and the composite primary outcome intensive care unit admission or death within 30 days post hospitalisation and the secondary outcome death within 30 days post hospitalisation was analysed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for gender, age, body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes. Clinical frailty scale was used as a categorical variable (fit score 1–4, frail score 5–6, and severely frail score 7–9). Results In total, 169 patients were included (47.3% women, mean age 79.2 ± 7.8 years). In the fully adjusted model, adjusted odds ratio for intensive care unit admission or death was 1.84 (95%-confidence interval 0.67–5.03, p = .234) for frail and 6.08 (1.70–21.81, p = .006) for severely frail compared to fit patients. For death, adjusted odds ratio was 2.81 (0.89–8.88, p = .079) for frail and 9.82 (2.53–38.10, p = .001) for severely frail compared to fit patients. Conclusions A high Clinical frailty scale score was an independent risk factor for the composite outcome intensive care unit admission or death and for the secondary outcome death.
临床虚弱量表作为COVID-19住院患者疾病严重程度的预测因子——一项观察性队列研究
背景2019冠状病毒病大流行使得合理的资源分配和优先级至关重要。虚弱会增加不良结果的风险,可以使用临床虚弱量表进行量化。本研究的目的是确定临床虚弱量表在年龄≥65岁的2019冠状病毒病患者中作为2019冠状病毒病重症监护病房入院或死亡的危险因素或作为死亡的危险因素的作用。方法对2020年3月5日至2020年7月5日期间经聚合酶链反应验证的2019冠状病毒病住院患者进行回顾性观察研究。采用多变量logistic回归模型对性别、年龄、体重指数、高血压和糖尿病进行校正,分析临床虚弱量表与重症监护病房入院或住院后30天内死亡的综合主要结局和住院后30天内死亡的次要结局之间的关系。采用临床虚弱量表作为分类变量(拟合评分1-4分,虚弱评分5-6分,严重虚弱评分7-9分)。结果共纳入169例患者,其中女性占47.3%,平均年龄79.2±7.8岁。在完全调整模型中,与符合条件的患者相比,体弱患者入住重症监护病房或死亡的调整优势比为1.84(95%可信区间0.67-5.03,p = 0.234),严重体弱患者的调整优势比为6.08 (1.70-21.81,p = 0.006)。对于死亡,与健康患者相比,虚弱患者的校正优势比为2.81 (0.89-8.88,p = 0.079),严重虚弱患者的校正优势比为9.82 (2.53-38.10,p = 0.001)。结论高临床虚弱量表评分是重症监护病房住院或死亡的综合结局和次要结局死亡的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases
Infectious Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
92
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases (formerly Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on all aspects of human infection, including pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, and also on medical microbiology and epidemiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信