Validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations for determining pressure loss coefficients of ventilation components

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
K. Tawackolian, M. Kriegel
{"title":"Validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations for determining pressure loss coefficients of ventilation components","authors":"K. Tawackolian, M. Kriegel","doi":"10.1177/01436244231159537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ventilation systems include a variety of components for which necessary pressure loss data is often unavailable. Computational fluid dynamics simulations could substitute for expensive measurements, but validation simulations with suitable data are crucial to assess model uncertainties. Existing CFD validation studies either did not focus specifically on pressure losses, only covered few components, or did not include recent developments in turbulence modelling. In the present work, 33 bends, 4 gates and 2 tees were simulated using a consistent approach. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were validated with published data: rectangular high-edge and wide-edge bends from the experimental dataset of Sprenger, gates and diverging tees from the SMACMA guide. The considered flows cover important basic flow phenomena: deflection, splitting and flow separation. The 39 components were simulated with three turbulence models at 14 Reynolds numbers. The simulations predicted pressure loss coefficients accurately for various components. Cases with strong flow separation regions were most challenging. The model prediction uncertainty was assessed by carrying out simulations with three selected turbulence models. As in the experimental data from Sprenger, the simulations showed a distinct dependence of pressure loss coefficients on the Reynolds number for bends. In contrast, for abrupt deflections and flow separation at sharp edges, the Reynolds number dependency was minor. \n Practical Application\n Technical pressure loss data of ductwork components is needed for the dimensioning, optimisation, and energy assessment of ventilation systems. The present validation study assesses the present state of the art of CFD simulations to determine pressure loss coefficients and the resulting prediction uncertainties.","PeriodicalId":50724,"journal":{"name":"Building Services Engineering Research & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Services Engineering Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01436244231159537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ventilation systems include a variety of components for which necessary pressure loss data is often unavailable. Computational fluid dynamics simulations could substitute for expensive measurements, but validation simulations with suitable data are crucial to assess model uncertainties. Existing CFD validation studies either did not focus specifically on pressure losses, only covered few components, or did not include recent developments in turbulence modelling. In the present work, 33 bends, 4 gates and 2 tees were simulated using a consistent approach. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were validated with published data: rectangular high-edge and wide-edge bends from the experimental dataset of Sprenger, gates and diverging tees from the SMACMA guide. The considered flows cover important basic flow phenomena: deflection, splitting and flow separation. The 39 components were simulated with three turbulence models at 14 Reynolds numbers. The simulations predicted pressure loss coefficients accurately for various components. Cases with strong flow separation regions were most challenging. The model prediction uncertainty was assessed by carrying out simulations with three selected turbulence models. As in the experimental data from Sprenger, the simulations showed a distinct dependence of pressure loss coefficients on the Reynolds number for bends. In contrast, for abrupt deflections and flow separation at sharp edges, the Reynolds number dependency was minor. Practical Application Technical pressure loss data of ductwork components is needed for the dimensioning, optimisation, and energy assessment of ventilation systems. The present validation study assesses the present state of the art of CFD simulations to determine pressure loss coefficients and the resulting prediction uncertainties.
确定通风部件压力损失系数的计算流体动力学模拟的验证
通风系统包括各种组件,这些组件通常无法获得必要的压力损失数据。计算流体动力学模拟可以代替昂贵的测量,但具有适当数据的验证模拟对于评估模型的不确定性至关重要。现有的CFD验证研究要么没有专门关注压力损失,只涵盖了少数组件,要么没有包括湍流建模的最新发展。在本工作中,使用一致的方法模拟了33个弯头、4个闸门和2个三通。计算流体动力学模拟用已发表的数据进行了验证:Sprenger实验数据集中的矩形高边和宽边弯曲,SMACMA指南中的闸门和分叉三通。所考虑的流动包括重要的基本流动现象:偏转、分流和流分离。用三个雷诺数为14的湍流模型对39个分量进行了模拟。模拟准确地预测了各种部件的压力损失系数。具有强流分离区域的情况最具挑战性。通过对三个选定的湍流模型进行模拟来评估模型预测的不确定性。与Sprenger的实验数据一样,模拟显示,弯管的压力损失系数明显依赖于雷诺数。相反,对于锐边处的突然偏转和流分离,雷诺数的依赖性很小。实际应用通风系统的尺寸、优化和能量评估需要管道系统组件的技术压力损失数据。本验证研究评估了CFD模拟的现状,以确定压力损失系数和由此产生的预测不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Building Services Engineering Research & Technology
Building Services Engineering Research & Technology 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Building Services Engineering Research & Technology is one of the foremost, international peer reviewed journals that publishes the highest quality original research relevant to today’s Built Environment. Published in conjunction with CIBSE, this impressive journal reports on the latest research providing you with an invaluable guide to recent developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信