T. Kerikmäe, P. Müürsepp, Henri Mart Pihl, Ondrej Ondrej Hamuľák, Hovsep Kocharyan
{"title":"Legal Person- or Agenthood of Artificial Intelligence Technologies","authors":"T. Kerikmäe, P. Müürsepp, Henri Mart Pihl, Ondrej Ondrej Hamuľák, Hovsep Kocharyan","doi":"10.11590/abhps.2020.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing rapidly. There are technologies available that fulfil several tasks better than humans can and even behave like humans to some extent. thus, the situation prompts the question whether Ai should be granted legal personand/or agenthood? there have been similar situations in history where the legal status of slaves or indigenous peoples was discussed. still, in those historical questions, the subjects under study were always natural persons, i.e., they were living beings belonging to the species Homo sapiens. We analyse the situation 1 The contribution of Peeter Müürsepp to the article was supported by Estonian Research Council grant no. PRG462. 2 Ondrej Hamuľák’s work on this article was supported by Jean Monnet Network Project 611293-EPP-1-2019-1-CZ-EPPJMO-NETWORK ‘European Union and the Challenges of Modern Society’. 3 Hovsep Kocharyan participated in the work on this article on behalf of the Project of specific research no. IGA_PF_2020_003 ‘Fostering the Right to be Forgotten as the Elementary E-right: Analyses of the Judicial Approach, Contemporary Developments and Challenges’.","PeriodicalId":37693,"journal":{"name":"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum","volume":"8 1","pages":"73-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing rapidly. There are technologies available that fulfil several tasks better than humans can and even behave like humans to some extent. thus, the situation prompts the question whether Ai should be granted legal personand/or agenthood? there have been similar situations in history where the legal status of slaves or indigenous peoples was discussed. still, in those historical questions, the subjects under study were always natural persons, i.e., they were living beings belonging to the species Homo sapiens. We analyse the situation 1 The contribution of Peeter Müürsepp to the article was supported by Estonian Research Council grant no. PRG462. 2 Ondrej Hamuľák’s work on this article was supported by Jean Monnet Network Project 611293-EPP-1-2019-1-CZ-EPPJMO-NETWORK ‘European Union and the Challenges of Modern Society’. 3 Hovsep Kocharyan participated in the work on this article on behalf of the Project of specific research no. IGA_PF_2020_003 ‘Fostering the Right to be Forgotten as the Elementary E-right: Analyses of the Judicial Approach, Contemporary Developments and Challenges’.
人工智能(AI)正在迅速发展。有一些技术可以比人类更好地完成一些任务,甚至在某种程度上表现得像人类。因此,这种情况引发了一个问题,即艾是否应该被授予法人和/或代理人身份?历史上也曾出现过类似的情况,讨论过奴隶或土著人民的法律地位。然而,在这些历史问题中,被研究的对象总是自然人,也就是说,他们是属于智人的生物。我们分析了情况1 peter m rsepp对这篇文章的贡献得到了爱沙尼亚研究委员会的资助。PRG462。2 Ondrej Hamuľák本文得到让·莫内网络项目611293-EPP-1-2019-1-CZ-EPPJMO-NETWORK“欧盟与现代社会的挑战”的支持。3 . Hovsep Kocharyan代表具体研究项目参与了本文的工作。“将被遗忘权作为一项基本的电子权利:司法途径、当代发展与挑战分析”。
期刊介绍:
Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum sees its mission in offering publishing opportunities for Baltic and non-Baltic scholars in the field of the history and philosophy of natural and social sciences (including legal studies) to promote and further international cooperation between scholars of different countries in this field.