Genealogy of tabunka kyōsei: A Critical Analysis of the Reformation of the Multicultural Co-living Discourse in Japan

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Yoshikazu Shiobara
{"title":"Genealogy of tabunka kyōsei: A Critical Analysis of the Reformation of the Multicultural Co-living Discourse in Japan","authors":"Yoshikazu Shiobara","doi":"10.1111/ijjs.12109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Japanese government started to accept semi-skilled foreign workers officially under the newly established <i>tokutei ginō</i> status in 2019, and national policies for supporting foreign residents are gradually being developed. However, it is unclear how the principles of <i>tabunka kyōsei</i> (multicultural coexistence or co-living), the official slogan for supporting foreign residents since the mid-2000s, have changed as a result of recent policy trends. In this article, I examine the transformation of logics for legitimizing policies for foreign residents using discourse analysis of the official government documents on <i>tabunka kyōsei</i>. Previous critical studies have revealed that <i>tabunka kyōsei</i> is based on the logic of a binary opposition between “Japanese” and “foreigners”. This was combined with the neoliberal logic of “supports for self-reliance”, a paternalism that sees foreigners as being in need of support if they can live \"just as\" Japanese. This paternalism has prevented the development of recognizing the human rights and cultural differences of foreign residents as de facto immigrants. In addition, a logic has explicitly emerged in the <i>tabunka kyōsei</i> discourse at the end of the 2010s that sees foreigners as a threat to national security and that their acceptance should be strictly governed by the border control policy and socially controlled from the viewpoint of national interests. To deal with this situation, <i>tabunka kyōsei</i> must be recreated as a principle for recognizing foreign residents as immigrants and guaranteeing their human rights and cultural differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":29652,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Sociology","volume":"29 1","pages":"22-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ijjs.12109","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijjs.12109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The Japanese government started to accept semi-skilled foreign workers officially under the newly established tokutei ginō status in 2019, and national policies for supporting foreign residents are gradually being developed. However, it is unclear how the principles of tabunka kyōsei (multicultural coexistence or co-living), the official slogan for supporting foreign residents since the mid-2000s, have changed as a result of recent policy trends. In this article, I examine the transformation of logics for legitimizing policies for foreign residents using discourse analysis of the official government documents on tabunka kyōsei. Previous critical studies have revealed that tabunka kyōsei is based on the logic of a binary opposition between “Japanese” and “foreigners”. This was combined with the neoliberal logic of “supports for self-reliance”, a paternalism that sees foreigners as being in need of support if they can live "just as" Japanese. This paternalism has prevented the development of recognizing the human rights and cultural differences of foreign residents as de facto immigrants. In addition, a logic has explicitly emerged in the tabunka kyōsei discourse at the end of the 2010s that sees foreigners as a threat to national security and that their acceptance should be strictly governed by the border control policy and socially controlled from the viewpoint of national interests. To deal with this situation, tabunka kyōsei must be recreated as a principle for recognizing foreign residents as immigrants and guaranteeing their human rights and cultural differences.

日本多文化共同生活话语改革的批判性分析
日本政府从2019年开始正式接受新设立的“德掌银人”地位下的半熟练外籍劳工,并正在逐步制定支持外籍居民的国家政策。但是,从2000年代中期开始,作为支持外国居民的官方口号的“tabunka kyōsei(多元文化共存或共同生活)”的原则在最近的政策趋势中发生了怎样的变化,目前还不清楚。本文透过对tabunka官方文件kyōsei的话语分析,检视外籍居民政策合法化的逻辑转换。先前的批判性研究表明,tabunka kyōsei是基于“日本人”和“外国人”二元对立的逻辑。这与“支持自力更生”的新自由主义逻辑相结合,这种家长式作风认为,如果外国人能“像”日本人一样生活,他们就需要支持。这种家长式作风阻碍了承认外国居民作为事实上的移民的人权和文化差异的发展。此外,在2010年代末的tabunka kyōsei话语中明确出现了一种逻辑,即将外国人视为对国家安全的威胁,他们的接受应严格遵守边境管制政策,并从国家利益的角度进行社会控制。为了处理这种情况,tabunka kyōsei必须重新成为一项承认外国居民为移民并保障其人权和文化差异的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信