Estrategias de manejo de terapias de alta eficacia para esclerosis múltiple en la práctica clínica

Q4 Medicine
Andrés Barboza , Jorge Correale , Ricardo Alonso , Marcos Burgos , Fernando Cáceres , Edgar Carnero-Contentti , Adriana Carrá , Edgardo Cristiano , Marcela Fiol , Orlando Garcea , Geraldine Luetic , Liliana Patrucco , Raúl Piedrabuena , Juan I. Rojas , Berenice Silva , Vladimiro Sinay , Carlos Vrech , María Célica Ysrraelit
{"title":"Estrategias de manejo de terapias de alta eficacia para esclerosis múltiple en la práctica clínica","authors":"Andrés Barboza ,&nbsp;Jorge Correale ,&nbsp;Ricardo Alonso ,&nbsp;Marcos Burgos ,&nbsp;Fernando Cáceres ,&nbsp;Edgar Carnero-Contentti ,&nbsp;Adriana Carrá ,&nbsp;Edgardo Cristiano ,&nbsp;Marcela Fiol ,&nbsp;Orlando Garcea ,&nbsp;Geraldine Luetic ,&nbsp;Liliana Patrucco ,&nbsp;Raúl Piedrabuena ,&nbsp;Juan I. Rojas ,&nbsp;Berenice Silva ,&nbsp;Vladimiro Sinay ,&nbsp;Carlos Vrech ,&nbsp;María Célica Ysrraelit","doi":"10.1016/j.neuarg.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are currently a significant number of options for disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS), which can be categorized as low, moderate, or highly effective based on their ability to control disease activity. As there are few comparative studies between high-efficacy therapies (HET), there is uncertainty about the best time to indicate or replace them.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assist treating physicians in making decisions about the choice and use of highly effective therapies, in different scenarios regarding persistence of activity, progression of disability, presence of poor prognostic factors, or adverse effects under treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Comments</h3><p>A group of Argentine neurologists with experience in the management of patients with MS was convened to discuss and identify valid options for the strategy of indications and management of HETs (cladribine, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This work aims to serve as a guide for treating physicians in case of doubts about the management of SAD, according to what they would do in their office referring to the management of MS in Argentina.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39051,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia Argentina","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 93-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia Argentina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1853002823000113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

There are currently a significant number of options for disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS), which can be categorized as low, moderate, or highly effective based on their ability to control disease activity. As there are few comparative studies between high-efficacy therapies (HET), there is uncertainty about the best time to indicate or replace them.

Objective

To assist treating physicians in making decisions about the choice and use of highly effective therapies, in different scenarios regarding persistence of activity, progression of disability, presence of poor prognostic factors, or adverse effects under treatment.

Comments

A group of Argentine neurologists with experience in the management of patients with MS was convened to discuss and identify valid options for the strategy of indications and management of HETs (cladribine, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab).

Conclusions

This work aims to serve as a guide for treating physicians in case of doubts about the management of SAD, according to what they would do in their office referring to the management of MS in Argentina.

临床实践中多发性硬化症高效治疗的管理策略
引言目前有大量的多发性硬化症(MS)疾病改良疗法可供选择,根据其控制疾病活动的能力,可分为低、中或高效。由于很少有高效疗法(HET)之间的比较研究,因此不确定指示或替代它们的最佳时机。目的帮助治疗医生在不同的情况下,就活动的持续性、残疾的进展、不良预后因素的存在或治疗中的不良反应,做出选择和使用高效疗法的决定。评论召集了一组在多发性硬化症患者管理方面有经验的阿根廷神经学家,讨论并确定HET适应症和管理策略的有效选择(cladribine、ocrelizumab、ofatumumab、natalizumab和alemtuzumab)。结论这项工作旨在为医生在对SAD的管理有疑问的情况下提供治疗指南,根据他们在办公室参考阿根廷MS的管理情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia Argentina
Neurologia Argentina Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Neurología Argentina es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Neurológica Argentina. Todos los artículos, publicados en español, son sometidos a un proceso de revisión sobre ciego por pares con la finalidad de ofrecer información original, relevante y de alta calidad que abarca todos los aspectos de la Neurología y la Neurociencia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信