Exploring the asymmetric impact of economic complexity, FDI, and green technology on carbon emissions: Policy stringency for clean-energy investing countries
{"title":"Exploring the asymmetric impact of economic complexity, FDI, and green technology on carbon emissions: Policy stringency for clean-energy investing countries","authors":"Najia Saqib , Gheorghița Dincă","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>All economies are concerned about rising carbon emissions, which contribute to environmental degradation. The current paper formulates a novel framework to scrutinize the impacts of shocks in economic complexity, FDI, environmental technology, and renewable energy on carbon emission in the leading clean energy investment countries, spanning the period from 1995 to 2020. In spite of the constraint for better environmental defence and the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this paper introduces an empirical approach utilizing the Panel NARDL methodology to investigate the asymmetrical connections between carbon emissions and relevant exogenous factors. Furthermore, we utilize additional techniques, namely AMG and CCEMG, to enhance the robustness of our findings. Our empirical findings reveal that positive shocks in economic complexity, FDI, environmental technology, and renewable energy reduce carbon emissions while negative shocks may result to elevated pollution levels in the long-run. However, adverse shocks in economic complexity and FDI cause increased pollution in the long run. Likewise, the short-run coefficient signs are also similar to the long-run coefficient signs but different in significance level and magnitude. This has paved the way for a well-designed policy for leading clean-energy investment countries should focus on structural change, FDI, technology and renewable energy consumption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"15 4","pages":"Article 101671"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498712300138X/pdfft?md5=70c2b85089b4e0cc79a1b7a88ac730a1&pid=1-s2.0-S167498712300138X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498712300138X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
All economies are concerned about rising carbon emissions, which contribute to environmental degradation. The current paper formulates a novel framework to scrutinize the impacts of shocks in economic complexity, FDI, environmental technology, and renewable energy on carbon emission in the leading clean energy investment countries, spanning the period from 1995 to 2020. In spite of the constraint for better environmental defence and the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this paper introduces an empirical approach utilizing the Panel NARDL methodology to investigate the asymmetrical connections between carbon emissions and relevant exogenous factors. Furthermore, we utilize additional techniques, namely AMG and CCEMG, to enhance the robustness of our findings. Our empirical findings reveal that positive shocks in economic complexity, FDI, environmental technology, and renewable energy reduce carbon emissions while negative shocks may result to elevated pollution levels in the long-run. However, adverse shocks in economic complexity and FDI cause increased pollution in the long run. Likewise, the short-run coefficient signs are also similar to the long-run coefficient signs but different in significance level and magnitude. This has paved the way for a well-designed policy for leading clean-energy investment countries should focus on structural change, FDI, technology and renewable energy consumption.
Geoscience frontiersEarth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.