Challenges of insight assessment in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: Initial results and clinical considerations from a measure development study

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Robert R. Selles , John R. Best , Cynthia Lu , Noam Soreni , Lara J. Farrell , Sharna Mathieu , S. Evelyn Stewart
{"title":"Challenges of insight assessment in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: Initial results and clinical considerations from a measure development study","authors":"Robert R. Selles ,&nbsp;John R. Best ,&nbsp;Cynthia Lu ,&nbsp;Noam Soreni ,&nbsp;Lara J. Farrell ,&nbsp;Sharna Mathieu ,&nbsp;S. Evelyn Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2022.100774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Assessing insight among OCD-affected youth has been limited by the absence of a multi-item measure for this population. The present study outlines the development of the <em>Measure of Insight for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder</em> (MI-OCD), presents initial findings, and explores conceptual challenges.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Along with the <em>Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale</em> (CY-BOCS), the 7-item MI-OCD was administered to 178 OCD-affected youth aged 7–19 (mean age = 13.5, SD = 2.8; 55% female) presenting for assessment across three OCD-specialty clinics. Items 4–7 were only completed by those with an identified feared outcome (61%).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MI-OCD items were positively correlated with the CY-BOCS’ insight question, but were not related to age or avoidance. Correlations and factor analysis indicated items coalesced around concepts of symptoms as unwanted (1–3) and symptoms as useful/valid (4–7), although factor fit and internal consistency was sub-optimal. Most youth perceived their symptoms as unwanted (positively correlated with severity), while the extent to which youth perceived symptoms as useful was more varied (not associated with severity).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Insight remains a challenging construct to assess in youth given various developmental, psychological, and environmental confounds. The MI-OCD may be useful in the context of evaluating and addressing individual barriers to treatment engagement over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364922000677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Assessing insight among OCD-affected youth has been limited by the absence of a multi-item measure for this population. The present study outlines the development of the Measure of Insight for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (MI-OCD), presents initial findings, and explores conceptual challenges.

Methods

Along with the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), the 7-item MI-OCD was administered to 178 OCD-affected youth aged 7–19 (mean age = 13.5, SD = 2.8; 55% female) presenting for assessment across three OCD-specialty clinics. Items 4–7 were only completed by those with an identified feared outcome (61%).

Results

MI-OCD items were positively correlated with the CY-BOCS’ insight question, but were not related to age or avoidance. Correlations and factor analysis indicated items coalesced around concepts of symptoms as unwanted (1–3) and symptoms as useful/valid (4–7), although factor fit and internal consistency was sub-optimal. Most youth perceived their symptoms as unwanted (positively correlated with severity), while the extent to which youth perceived symptoms as useful was more varied (not associated with severity).

Discussion

Insight remains a challenging construct to assess in youth given various developmental, psychological, and environmental confounds. The MI-OCD may be useful in the context of evaluating and addressing individual barriers to treatment engagement over time.

儿童强迫症洞察力评估的挑战:一项测量发展研究的初步结果和临床考虑
背景:由于缺乏针对这一人群的多项目测量,评估受强迫症影响的青少年的洞察力受到了限制。本研究概述了强迫症(MI-OCD)洞察力测量的发展,提出了初步的发现,并探讨了概念上的挑战。方法采用儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(CY-BOCS)对178名7 ~ 19岁的强迫症青少年(平均年龄13.5岁,SD = 2.8;55%为女性)在三个强迫症专科诊所进行评估。只有那些确定害怕结果的人才完成了项目4-7(61%)。结果smi - ocd项目与CY-BOCS的洞察力问题呈正相关,与年龄和回避不相关。相关性和因素分析表明,尽管因素拟合和内部一致性不是最佳的,但项目围绕着症状是不需要的(1-3)和症状是有用/有效的(4-7)的概念结合在一起。大多数青年认为他们的症状是不需要的(与严重程度呈正相关),而青年认为症状有用的程度则各不相同(与严重程度无关)。考虑到各种发展、心理和环境因素,对青少年进行评估仍然是一个具有挑战性的概念。随着时间的推移,在评估和解决个体障碍的情况下,MI-OCD可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信