Engaging young people with disabilities in research about their experiences of physical education and sport: A scoping review of methodologies and methods

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Meg Clish, Eimear Enright, Leigh Sperka, S. Tweedy
{"title":"Engaging young people with disabilities in research about their experiences of physical education and sport: A scoping review of methodologies and methods","authors":"Meg Clish, Eimear Enright, Leigh Sperka, S. Tweedy","doi":"10.1177/1356336X221141598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Young people with disabilities (PWD) have increasingly become part of complex and important conversations surrounding their experiences and engagement in physical education (PE) and sport. Despite more young voices being heard, scant attention has been given to why we are listening, who we are listening to, and how we are listening. In this scoping review, we focus on the methodologies and methods used when researching the perspectives young PWD hold of PE and sport. Through searching Google Scholar, PE and sport journals, and citations and references of relevant research studies, we retrieved 52 empirical publications and information was extracted on their aims, country of origin, context and participants, research design, data sources, analytical, theoretical and conceptual frameworks, and key findings and recommendations. By reviewing methodologies and methods, we were able to identify that: authors often justified their work as ‘filling a gap’; varied, and often minimal, participant information was provided; and finally, data generation methods were at times exclusionary and/or not sensitive to disability research contexts. Moving forward, we first recommend that careful consideration is given to why research is being done beyond contributing knowledge to the field. Second, detailed information must be provided about participants to have a clearer picture about who has and has not been included in research so that findings can be contextualised. Finally, greater attention must be given to alternative and inclusive data generation methods to engage more diverse young people, specifically those with high support needs, in research about PE and youth sport.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"331 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221141598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Young people with disabilities (PWD) have increasingly become part of complex and important conversations surrounding their experiences and engagement in physical education (PE) and sport. Despite more young voices being heard, scant attention has been given to why we are listening, who we are listening to, and how we are listening. In this scoping review, we focus on the methodologies and methods used when researching the perspectives young PWD hold of PE and sport. Through searching Google Scholar, PE and sport journals, and citations and references of relevant research studies, we retrieved 52 empirical publications and information was extracted on their aims, country of origin, context and participants, research design, data sources, analytical, theoretical and conceptual frameworks, and key findings and recommendations. By reviewing methodologies and methods, we were able to identify that: authors often justified their work as ‘filling a gap’; varied, and often minimal, participant information was provided; and finally, data generation methods were at times exclusionary and/or not sensitive to disability research contexts. Moving forward, we first recommend that careful consideration is given to why research is being done beyond contributing knowledge to the field. Second, detailed information must be provided about participants to have a clearer picture about who has and has not been included in research so that findings can be contextualised. Finally, greater attention must be given to alternative and inclusive data generation methods to engage more diverse young people, specifically those with high support needs, in research about PE and youth sport.
让残疾青年参与体育教育和体育体验的研究:方法和方法的范围审查
残疾青年(PWD)越来越多地成为围绕他们的经历和参与体育运动的复杂而重要对话的一部分。尽管越来越多的年轻人的声音被听到,但很少有人关注我们为什么要听,我们在听谁,以及我们如何听。在这一范围审查中,我们将重点放在研究年轻PWD对体育和运动的看法时使用的方法和方法上。通过检索谷歌Scholar、体育与体育期刊以及相关研究的引文和参考文献,我们检索了52篇实证出版物,并提取了其目的、原产国、背景和参与者、研究设计、数据来源、分析、理论和概念框架、主要发现和建议等信息。通过审查方法和方法,我们能够确定:作者经常将他们的工作证明为“填补空白”;提供了各种各样的、往往很少的参与者信息;最后,数据生成方法有时具有排他性和/或对残疾研究背景不敏感。展望未来,我们首先建议仔细考虑为什么要在为该领域贡献知识之外进行研究。其次,必须提供有关参与者的详细信息,以便更清楚地了解谁被包括在研究中,谁没有被包括在研究中,以便将研究结果纳入背景。最后,必须更加重视替代性和包容性的数据生成方法,以吸引更多不同的年轻人,特别是那些需要高度支持的年轻人,参与体育和青少年体育的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信