{"title":"Measurement of renal congestion and compliance following intravenous fluid administration using shear wave elastography","authors":"Damian Bruce-Hickman MBBS , Zhen Yu Lim MRCP, MMed , Huey Ying Lim MRCP, MMed , Faheem Khan FCEM, FFICM (UK) , Shilpa Rastogi MBBS, MD , Chee Keat Tan MMed (Anaes), FANZCA , Clara Lee Ying Ngoh MB ChB MRCP M.Med, FAMS","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) is a novel technique that may provide non-invasive measurements of renal compliance. We aimed to investigate the relationship between intravenous (IV) fluid administration and change in SWE measurements. We hypothesised that following IV fluid administration in healthy volunteers, global kidney stiffness would increase and that this increase in stiffness could be quantified using SWE. Our second hypothesis was that graduated doses of IV fluids would result in a dose-dependent increase in global kidney stiffness measured by SWE.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised prospective study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Intensive Care Unit.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Healthy volunteers aged 18–40 years.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Participants were randomised to receive 20 ml/kg, 30 ml/kg, or 40 ml/kg of normal saline. The volume of fluid infused was based on the actual body weight recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>We recorded average SWE stiffness (kPa with standard deviation of the mean), median SWE stiffness (kPa), and the interquartile range.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety-eight percent of participants (44/45) demonstrated an increase in global kidney stiffness following administration of IV fluids. The average SWE pre fluid administration was 7.572 kPa ± 2.38 versus 14.9 kPa ± 4.81 post fluid administration (<em>p</em> < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, there were significant changes in global kidney stiffness pre and post fluid administration with each volume (ml/kg) of fluid administered. Average percentage change in global kidney stiffness from baseline was compared between the three groups. There was no significant difference when comparing groups 1 and 2 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 216.1% ± 72.0, p ¼ 0.398), groups 2 and 3 (216.1% increase ± 72.0 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.455), or groups 1 and 3 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.972).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Fluid administration results in immediately visible and quantifiable changes in global kidney stiffness across all infused volumes of fluid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) is a novel technique that may provide non-invasive measurements of renal compliance. We aimed to investigate the relationship between intravenous (IV) fluid administration and change in SWE measurements. We hypothesised that following IV fluid administration in healthy volunteers, global kidney stiffness would increase and that this increase in stiffness could be quantified using SWE. Our second hypothesis was that graduated doses of IV fluids would result in a dose-dependent increase in global kidney stiffness measured by SWE.
Design
Randomised prospective study.
Setting
Intensive Care Unit.
Participants
Healthy volunteers aged 18–40 years.
Interventions
Participants were randomised to receive 20 ml/kg, 30 ml/kg, or 40 ml/kg of normal saline. The volume of fluid infused was based on the actual body weight recorded.
Main outcome measures
We recorded average SWE stiffness (kPa with standard deviation of the mean), median SWE stiffness (kPa), and the interquartile range.
Results
Ninety-eight percent of participants (44/45) demonstrated an increase in global kidney stiffness following administration of IV fluids. The average SWE pre fluid administration was 7.572 kPa ± 2.38 versus 14.9 kPa ± 4.81 post fluid administration (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, there were significant changes in global kidney stiffness pre and post fluid administration with each volume (ml/kg) of fluid administered. Average percentage change in global kidney stiffness from baseline was compared between the three groups. There was no significant difference when comparing groups 1 and 2 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 216.1% ± 72.0, p ¼ 0.398), groups 2 and 3 (216.1% increase ± 72.0 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.455), or groups 1 and 3 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.972).
Conclusions
Fluid administration results in immediately visible and quantifiable changes in global kidney stiffness across all infused volumes of fluid.
目的超声横波弹性成像(SWE)是一种可以无创测量肾脏顺应性的新技术。我们的目的是研究静脉(IV)输液与SWE测量变化之间的关系。我们假设在健康志愿者进行静脉输液后,整体肾脏硬度会增加,并且这种硬度的增加可以使用SWE进行量化。我们的第二个假设是,逐步剂量的静脉输液会导致SWE测量的整体肾脏硬度的剂量依赖性增加。随机前瞻性研究。设置重症监护病房。参与者:18-40岁的健康志愿者。干预措施:参与者被随机分配接受20ml /kg、30ml /kg或40ml /kg生理盐水。输入的液体量是根据实际体重记录的。主要结果测量:我们记录了平均SWE刚度(kPa,平均值的标准差)、中位SWE刚度(kPa)和四分位数范围。结果:98%的参与者(44/45)在静脉输液后表现出整体肾脏僵硬度增加。注射前平均SWE为7.572 kPa±2.38,注射后为14.9 kPa±4.81 (p <0.001)。在亚组分析中,给液前后肾脏硬度随给液体积(ml/kg)的变化有显著变化。比较三组患者从基线开始的总体肾脏硬度的平均百分比变化。1、2组(197.1%增加±49.5 vs 216.1%±72.0,p¼0.398)、2、3组(216.1%增加±72.0 vs 197.8%±59.9,p¼0.455)、1、3组(197.1%增加±49.5 vs 197.8%±59.9,p¼0.972)比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:在所有输注量的液体中,给药可立即产生可见的、可量化的整体肾脏硬度变化。
期刊介绍:
ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines.
The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world.
The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.