Micro models of COVID 19 pandemic governance: Reflections on the strategies taken by two states in India

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
R. Dash, Anupama Ar
{"title":"Micro models of COVID 19 pandemic governance: Reflections on the strategies taken by two states in India","authors":"R. Dash, Anupama Ar","doi":"10.1002/pad.2008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the outbreak of the Covid 19 pandemic, governments across the world including India, a South-Asian country is busy ‘strategizing', ‘managing' ‘containing' the crisis to restrict its spread. But given the vastness and diversity of the Indian territory, one pan Indian model of is not possible and the states have been working in consonance with the centre in a matter of ‘cooperative federalism' and are implementing various micro models of Covid 19 governance. This paper explores the micro models of governance strategies taken by states in India namely, Kerala located in its Southern coast and Odisha in the Eastern coast which have been experiencing disasters be it health or natural calamities. Inspite of the differences in social development indicators between both the states, they have managed to keep the death rates lower in the initial phases of the outbreak in comparison to other states. This is reflected in the strategies they took in controlling the pandemic like \"preparedness” \"decentralisation”, \"community participation”. However, inspite of deploying various governance models, the gradual unlocking led to the explosion of positive cases as a result of which the challenges to deal with the pandemic still looms large. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.","PeriodicalId":39679,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the Covid 19 pandemic, governments across the world including India, a South-Asian country is busy ‘strategizing', ‘managing' ‘containing' the crisis to restrict its spread. But given the vastness and diversity of the Indian territory, one pan Indian model of is not possible and the states have been working in consonance with the centre in a matter of ‘cooperative federalism' and are implementing various micro models of Covid 19 governance. This paper explores the micro models of governance strategies taken by states in India namely, Kerala located in its Southern coast and Odisha in the Eastern coast which have been experiencing disasters be it health or natural calamities. Inspite of the differences in social development indicators between both the states, they have managed to keep the death rates lower in the initial phases of the outbreak in comparison to other states. This is reflected in the strategies they took in controlling the pandemic like "preparedness” "decentralisation”, "community participation”. However, inspite of deploying various governance models, the gradual unlocking led to the explosion of positive cases as a result of which the challenges to deal with the pandemic still looms large. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2019冠状病毒病疫情治理的微观模型:对印度两个邦所采取战略的思考
自新冠肺炎疫情爆发以来,包括南亚国家印度在内的世界各国政府正忙于“制定战略”、“管理”和“遏制”危机,以限制其蔓延。但鉴于印度领土的广阔和多样性,一种泛印度模式是不可能的,各州一直在“合作联邦制”方面与该中心保持一致,并正在实施新冠肺炎19治理的各种微观模式。本文探讨了印度南部海岸的喀拉拉邦和东部海岸的奥里萨邦所采取的治理战略的微观模式,这些邦经历了健康或自然灾害等灾难。尽管这两个州的社会发展指标存在差异,但与其他州相比,他们在疫情爆发的最初阶段成功地将死亡率保持在较低水平。这反映在他们在控制疫情时采取的策略中,如“准备”、“权力下放”、“社区参与”。然而,尽管部署了各种治理模式,但逐步解锁导致阳性病例激增,因此应对疫情的挑战仍然很大。©2023 John Wiley&Sons有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Administration and Development
Public Administration and Development Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1949, Public Administration and Development (PAD) has been reviewing and assessing the practice of public administration at the local, regional, national and international levels where it is directed to managing development processes in low and medium income countries. It gives special attention to investigations of the management of all phases of public policy formulation and implementation which have an interest and importance beyond a particular government and state. PAD has a particular interest in the link between public administration practice and management research and provides a professional and academic forum for reporting on new experiences and experiments. PAD also publishes articles on development management research in the NGO sector. It is widely read by academics and practitioners alike, including consultants, donors and policy advisers. With its case study approach, it is also frequently used for teaching and training purposes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信