Archaeological soil from Roman occupational layers can be differentiated by microbial and chemical signatures

IF 2.1 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE
G. Taylor, Rhys Williams, H. Halldórsdóttir, Ashleigh Carter, A. Birley, Alexander Meyer, C. Orr
{"title":"Archaeological soil from Roman occupational layers can be differentiated by microbial and chemical signatures","authors":"G. Taylor, Rhys Williams, H. Halldórsdóttir, Ashleigh Carter, A. Birley, Alexander Meyer, C. Orr","doi":"10.3389/fsoil.2023.1129040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Soil at the Roman site of Vindolanda (Northumberland, UK) provides excellent preservation of wooden artefacts including Roman writing tablets. Methods In this study we examined chemical and microbial signature changes within varied occupation contexts of archaeological soil. Analysis included investigating elemental composition, sterol biomarkers, bacterial diversity and community structures from excavation trenches at Vindolanda using pXRF, GC-MS and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Samples were taken from varying depths starting at topsoil and working down through layers of Roman occupation including one cavalry stable floor, two infantry barracks and a cook house, and layers which contained Roman writing tablets. Results and Discussion The chemical results indicate that areas where wooden artefacts were found had increased soil moisture which was also correlated with specific chemical conditions including shifts in iron, sulphur and phosphorous concentration. Steroid biomarkers indicate the presence of faecal matter in layers, supporting occupation descriptions. Overall microbial diversity did not change across the depth profile but was correlated with soil moisture. Anaerobic soils associated with more optimal preservation differed to other soils with increases in Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Campilobacterota and Bacteroidota observed. Microbial community structure and putative function as revealed by PICRUSt2 is linked to occupation usage rather than depth of samples with laminated floor layers differing from turf structures. Understanding the complex processes within archaeological soil can help us to understand dynamics of decomposition and preservation. In addition, the apparent preservation of the environmental microbial community as well as the artefacts themselves allows us to understand the microbial environments of the past, how they relate to the present and what this means for our changing environments in the future.","PeriodicalId":73107,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in soil science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in soil science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2023.1129040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Soil at the Roman site of Vindolanda (Northumberland, UK) provides excellent preservation of wooden artefacts including Roman writing tablets. Methods In this study we examined chemical and microbial signature changes within varied occupation contexts of archaeological soil. Analysis included investigating elemental composition, sterol biomarkers, bacterial diversity and community structures from excavation trenches at Vindolanda using pXRF, GC-MS and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Samples were taken from varying depths starting at topsoil and working down through layers of Roman occupation including one cavalry stable floor, two infantry barracks and a cook house, and layers which contained Roman writing tablets. Results and Discussion The chemical results indicate that areas where wooden artefacts were found had increased soil moisture which was also correlated with specific chemical conditions including shifts in iron, sulphur and phosphorous concentration. Steroid biomarkers indicate the presence of faecal matter in layers, supporting occupation descriptions. Overall microbial diversity did not change across the depth profile but was correlated with soil moisture. Anaerobic soils associated with more optimal preservation differed to other soils with increases in Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Campilobacterota and Bacteroidota observed. Microbial community structure and putative function as revealed by PICRUSt2 is linked to occupation usage rather than depth of samples with laminated floor layers differing from turf structures. Understanding the complex processes within archaeological soil can help us to understand dynamics of decomposition and preservation. In addition, the apparent preservation of the environmental microbial community as well as the artefacts themselves allows us to understand the microbial environments of the past, how they relate to the present and what this means for our changing environments in the future.
罗马职业层的考古土壤可以通过微生物和化学特征进行区分
Vindolanda(英国诺森伯兰郡)罗马遗址的土壤提供了保存完好的木制文物,包括罗马书写板。方法在本研究中,我们研究了考古土壤在不同职业背景下的化学和微生物特征变化。分析包括利用pXRF、GC-MS和16S rRNA基因扩增子测序研究Vindolanda挖掘沟的元素组成、甾醇生物标志物、细菌多样性和群落结构。样本取自不同的深度,从表层土壤开始,深入到罗马人的占领层,包括一个骑兵马厩的地板,两个步兵营房和一个炊事房,以及包含罗马书写板的层。化学结果表明,发现木器的地区土壤湿度增加,这也与特定的化学条件有关,包括铁、硫和磷浓度的变化。类固醇生物标志物表明,在蛋类中存在粪便物质,支持职业描述。总体微生物多样性在深度剖面上没有变化,但与土壤湿度相关。与其他土壤相比,厌氧土壤保存效果更好,厚壁菌门、变形菌门、campilobacteria和拟杆菌门数量均有所增加。PICRUSt2揭示的微生物群落结构和假定功能与职业使用有关,而不是与不同于草坪结构的层压地板样品的深度有关。了解考古土壤中的复杂过程可以帮助我们理解分解和保存的动力学。此外,环境微生物群落以及人工制品本身的明显保存使我们能够了解过去的微生物环境,它们与现在的关系以及这对我们未来不断变化的环境意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信