Can a formalised model of co-production contribute to empowering indigenous communities in decisions about land use?

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
A. Gillies
{"title":"Can a formalised model of co-production contribute to empowering indigenous communities in decisions about land use?","authors":"A. Gillies","doi":"10.1108/JGR-09-2020-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nCo-production has been used in public services in the UK areas such as mental health to improve the participation of service users in decisions made about the services traditionally provided for them and done to them. It has also been used in areas such as mental health and to address concerns about the quality of services provided to members of minority communities. Western Australia is currently passing legislation to address the issue of aboriginal cultural heritage management in the context of recent adverse incidents such as the incident where Rio Tinto was responsible for the destruction of the site. This paper aims to show how a formalised model of co-production can assist in the implementation of this legislation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper considers how effective co-production has been within the domain of mental health services in the UK and then considers whether they are lessons that may be learnt in other contexts. It considers whether concepts from co-production have a role to play in ensuring that the legislation and its implementation are not seen as actions done to or on behalf of the aboriginal communities and if a more structured approach to coproduction can produce a model, which facilitates genuinely collaborative aboriginal heritage management.\n\n\nFindings\nThe approach has facilitated the development of a model to monitor and improve collaboration within aboriginal cultural heritage management, which complements existing participatory approaches and enables businesses to demonstrate their legislatory compliance.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe study offers an approach, which may be used globally to empower indigenous communities in decision-making in other contexts, such as deforestation in South America and oil and gas exploitation on Inuit and First Nations land in Canada.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe use of co-production concepts and capability modelling is novel in this space.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-09-2020-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Co-production has been used in public services in the UK areas such as mental health to improve the participation of service users in decisions made about the services traditionally provided for them and done to them. It has also been used in areas such as mental health and to address concerns about the quality of services provided to members of minority communities. Western Australia is currently passing legislation to address the issue of aboriginal cultural heritage management in the context of recent adverse incidents such as the incident where Rio Tinto was responsible for the destruction of the site. This paper aims to show how a formalised model of co-production can assist in the implementation of this legislation. Design/methodology/approach This paper considers how effective co-production has been within the domain of mental health services in the UK and then considers whether they are lessons that may be learnt in other contexts. It considers whether concepts from co-production have a role to play in ensuring that the legislation and its implementation are not seen as actions done to or on behalf of the aboriginal communities and if a more structured approach to coproduction can produce a model, which facilitates genuinely collaborative aboriginal heritage management. Findings The approach has facilitated the development of a model to monitor and improve collaboration within aboriginal cultural heritage management, which complements existing participatory approaches and enables businesses to demonstrate their legislatory compliance. Social implications The study offers an approach, which may be used globally to empower indigenous communities in decision-making in other contexts, such as deforestation in South America and oil and gas exploitation on Inuit and First Nations land in Canada. Originality/value The use of co-production concepts and capability modelling is novel in this space.
一个正式的合作生产模式能否有助于在土地使用决策中赋予土著社区权力?
目的联合王国的公共服务领域,如心理健康领域,已采用协同生产,以提高服务使用者对传统上向他们提供和向他们提供的服务的决策的参与程度。它还被用于心理健康等领域,并用于解决对向少数民族社区成员提供的服务质量的关切。西澳大利亚州目前正在通过立法,在最近发生的不利事件的背景下解决土著文化遗产管理问题,例如里约热内卢Tinto对该遗址的破坏负有责任的事件。本文旨在展示正式的合作生产模式如何有助于实施这一立法。设计/方法/方法本文考虑了在英国精神卫生服务领域内合作生产的有效性,然后考虑它们是否可以在其他情况下学习。它考虑了合作制作的概念是否在确保立法及其实施不被视为针对或代表土著社区的行动方面发挥作用,以及更结构化的合作制作方法是否可以产生一种模式,从而促进真正的土著遗产合作管理。该方法促进了一种模式的发展,以监测和改善土著文化遗产管理中的合作,它补充了现有的参与性方法,并使企业能够证明其遵守法律。社会意义这项研究提供了一种方法,可以在全球范围内用于在其他情况下赋予土著社区决策权力,例如南美洲的森林砍伐和加拿大因纽特人和第一民族土地上的石油和天然气开采。在这个领域,联合制作概念和能力建模的使用是新颖的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信