Nickolai Shadrin, Vladimir Yakovenko, Elena Anufriieva
{"title":"Behavior of Gammarus aequicauda (Crustacea, Amphipoda) during predation on Artemia (Crustacea, Anostraca): New experimental results","authors":"Nickolai Shadrin, Vladimir Yakovenko, Elena Anufriieva","doi":"10.1002/iroh.202002059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Gammarus aequicauda</i> and <i>Artemia</i> spp. are abundant crustacean species in Crimean hypersaline lakes. <i>G. aequicauda</i> preys on <i>Artemia</i> but there was no quantitative data on this before the current study. Predation of <i>G. aequicauda</i> on adult <i>Artemia</i> was studied in experiments with two different approaches evaluating (a) the time balance of the feeding process and (b) the grazing intensity. The threshold prey concentration, when consumption began to increase with increasing concentration, was approximately 15 ind./L in 200-ml vessels and about 5 ind./L in 500-ml vessels. When the <i>Artemia</i> abundance reached 20–25 ind./L, there was no further influence on the gammarid consumption rate. There was a significant negative correlation between the consumption rate of gammarids and <i>Artemia</i> abundance. According to study results, an individual <i>G. aequicauda</i> may eat up to 20–24 <i>Artemia</i>/day. Our study suggests that (a) <i>G. aequicauda</i> is an omnivorous species and can significantly suppress populations of its prey. (b) The two experimental approaches used to study the feeding of gammarids on <i>Artemia</i> produced similar results, and both may be used to quantitatively assess relations in a “prey–predator” system. (c) The abundance of predators and prey, as well as the experimental vessel volume, may influence the feeding rate. (d) The presence of plant food resources such as the leaves of <i>Ruppia</i> does not influence on the predatory feeding rate of <i>G. aequicauda</i>. (e) The rate of prey consumption by <i>G. aequicauda</i> is not constant and depends nonlinearly on prey and predator abundance. (f) Cannibalism occurs in the presence of plant resources only, but not in the presence of <i>Artemia</i>. (g) Other gammarids react to the capture of <i>Artemia</i> by one of them. They swim up to the successful individual and try to take some part of the prey.</p>","PeriodicalId":54928,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Hydrobiology","volume":"105 5-6","pages":"143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/iroh.202002059","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iroh.202002059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Gammarus aequicauda and Artemia spp. are abundant crustacean species in Crimean hypersaline lakes. G. aequicauda preys on Artemia but there was no quantitative data on this before the current study. Predation of G. aequicauda on adult Artemia was studied in experiments with two different approaches evaluating (a) the time balance of the feeding process and (b) the grazing intensity. The threshold prey concentration, when consumption began to increase with increasing concentration, was approximately 15 ind./L in 200-ml vessels and about 5 ind./L in 500-ml vessels. When the Artemia abundance reached 20–25 ind./L, there was no further influence on the gammarid consumption rate. There was a significant negative correlation between the consumption rate of gammarids and Artemia abundance. According to study results, an individual G. aequicauda may eat up to 20–24 Artemia/day. Our study suggests that (a) G. aequicauda is an omnivorous species and can significantly suppress populations of its prey. (b) The two experimental approaches used to study the feeding of gammarids on Artemia produced similar results, and both may be used to quantitatively assess relations in a “prey–predator” system. (c) The abundance of predators and prey, as well as the experimental vessel volume, may influence the feeding rate. (d) The presence of plant food resources such as the leaves of Ruppia does not influence on the predatory feeding rate of G. aequicauda. (e) The rate of prey consumption by G. aequicauda is not constant and depends nonlinearly on prey and predator abundance. (f) Cannibalism occurs in the presence of plant resources only, but not in the presence of Artemia. (g) Other gammarids react to the capture of Artemia by one of them. They swim up to the successful individual and try to take some part of the prey.
期刊介绍:
As human populations grow across the planet, water security, biodiversity loss and the loss of aquatic ecosystem services take on ever increasing priority for policy makers. International Review of Hydrobiology brings together in one forum fundamental and problem-oriented research on the challenges facing marine and freshwater biology in an economically changing world. Interdisciplinary in nature, articles cover all aspects of aquatic ecosystems, ranging from headwater streams to the ocean and biodiversity studies to ecosystem functioning, modeling approaches including GIS and resource management, with special emphasis on the link between marine and freshwater environments. The editors expressly welcome research on baseline data. The knowledge-driven papers will interest researchers, while the problem-driven articles will be of particular interest to policy makers. The overarching aim of the journal is to translate science into policy, allowing us to understand global systems yet act on a regional scale.
International Review of Hydrobiology publishes original articles, reviews, short communications, and methods papers.