Survival through Pragmatic Thinking: Revisiting the Untold Stories behind the Canada–China Grain Trade, 1960–63

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Yun Liu, Liyang Zhang, An Dong, Junlin Li, Peihua Zhu, Yan Shao, Ryan Ho, Enshen Li, Xifen Lin, Sihong Liu, Y. Chung, Hao Xiong, Wen-hsuan Tsai, Chih-Wei Yu, Sibei Sun, Xiangning Wu, Song Niu, Rui Wu, Jinrui Xi
{"title":"Survival through Pragmatic Thinking: Revisiting the Untold Stories behind the Canada–China Grain Trade, 1960–63","authors":"Yun Liu, Liyang Zhang, An Dong, Junlin Li, Peihua Zhu, Yan Shao, Ryan Ho, Enshen Li, Xifen Lin, Sihong Liu, Y. Chung, Hao Xiong, Wen-hsuan Tsai, Chih-Wei Yu, Sibei Sun, Xiangning Wu, Song Niu, Rui Wu, Jinrui Xi","doi":"10.1353/chn.2023.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the untold stories behind the Canada–China grain trade in the 1960–63 period. According to some archived records of Canadian business proceedings that have yet barely been examined, non-state agents in both nations took joint initiatives to deliver these grain sales, demonstrating pragmatic attitudes to de-escalate political tensions. Despite intensive disputes that persistently sabotaged trade normalisation, many actors devoted tireless efforts consistent with the future trend of public diplomacy. Acting on behalf of local civil societies and business associations, Canadian wheat trade agents facilitated effective two-way communication with their Chinese peers. The emphasis on common interests, rather than on ideological assertion, helped to contain political distrust with \"de-othering\" narratives. Increased engagement by civilian stakeholders thus served to hedge against political risk exposures.","PeriodicalId":45391,"journal":{"name":"China-An International Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"1 - 113 - 114 - 134 - 135 - 159 - 160 - 176 - 177 - 203 - 204 - 207 - 208 - 209 - 23 - 24 - 44 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2023.0000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article examines the untold stories behind the Canada–China grain trade in the 1960–63 period. According to some archived records of Canadian business proceedings that have yet barely been examined, non-state agents in both nations took joint initiatives to deliver these grain sales, demonstrating pragmatic attitudes to de-escalate political tensions. Despite intensive disputes that persistently sabotaged trade normalisation, many actors devoted tireless efforts consistent with the future trend of public diplomacy. Acting on behalf of local civil societies and business associations, Canadian wheat trade agents facilitated effective two-way communication with their Chinese peers. The emphasis on common interests, rather than on ideological assertion, helped to contain political distrust with "de-othering" narratives. Increased engagement by civilian stakeholders thus served to hedge against political risk exposures.
务实思维中的生存:重温1960-63年加中粮食贸易背后不为人知的故事
摘要:本文探讨了1960-63年间加拿大与中国粮食贸易背后不为人知的故事。根据一些几乎没有经过审查的加拿大商业诉讼存档记录,两国的非国家代理人采取了联合行动来提供这些粮食销售,表明了缓和政治紧张局势的务实态度。尽管激烈的争端持续破坏了贸易正常化,但许多行为体都做出了与未来公共外交趋势一致的不懈努力。加拿大小麦贸易代理商代表当地民间社会和商业协会,促进了与中国同行的有效双向沟通。强调共同利益,而不是意识形态主张,有助于通过“去他者化”叙事来遏制政治不信任。因此,民间利益攸关方的更多参与有助于对冲政治风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信