The cultural fields of accounting practices: Institutionalization and accounting changes beyond the organization

IF 3.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Keith Robson , Mahmoud Ezzamel
{"title":"The cultural fields of accounting practices: Institutionalization and accounting changes beyond the organization","authors":"Keith Robson ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Ezzamel","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2022.101379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research interest in the institutionalization of accounting has risen appreciably in the past twenty years. Much of this work has been occupied with regulations and professional norms, often in individual firm settings. However, social spaces around, i.e., institutional fields, and beyond corporations, regulatory agencies and professional organizations are important in the process of accounting innovation and transformation. This paper draws attention to these social spaces by developing the concept of <em>the cultural fields of accounting practices</em><span> as an institutional field level analysis that has so far been relatively neglected in the accounting literature. In developing this concept, we outline how we define and characterise cultural fields, emphasizing their cultural-cognitive character, their lack of formal governance, their dispersion and the varying social space they can inhabit (from bounded technology fields to global ‘world culture’ Meyer, 2009; Lechner &amp; Boli, 2005). Our term ‘cultural fields’ references both the wider, field-level processes that are not captured by a focus upon professional norms and state regulations, and the ‘cultural-cognitive’ character of cultural field-level processes that we argue merit wider consideration in accounting research. We identify three linked features of the cultural fields of accounting practices: the dispersed sites of the cultural production of accounting; the diverse, shifting and hybridised logics; and the role of arbiters of tastes and the carriers of ‘best practices’. We draw on these key features to discuss and offer examples of researching accounting that would address these processes of accounting development and institutionalization.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48379,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Organizations and Society","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 101379"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Organizations and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368222000460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Research interest in the institutionalization of accounting has risen appreciably in the past twenty years. Much of this work has been occupied with regulations and professional norms, often in individual firm settings. However, social spaces around, i.e., institutional fields, and beyond corporations, regulatory agencies and professional organizations are important in the process of accounting innovation and transformation. This paper draws attention to these social spaces by developing the concept of the cultural fields of accounting practices as an institutional field level analysis that has so far been relatively neglected in the accounting literature. In developing this concept, we outline how we define and characterise cultural fields, emphasizing their cultural-cognitive character, their lack of formal governance, their dispersion and the varying social space they can inhabit (from bounded technology fields to global ‘world culture’ Meyer, 2009; Lechner & Boli, 2005). Our term ‘cultural fields’ references both the wider, field-level processes that are not captured by a focus upon professional norms and state regulations, and the ‘cultural-cognitive’ character of cultural field-level processes that we argue merit wider consideration in accounting research. We identify three linked features of the cultural fields of accounting practices: the dispersed sites of the cultural production of accounting; the diverse, shifting and hybridised logics; and the role of arbiters of tastes and the carriers of ‘best practices’. We draw on these key features to discuss and offer examples of researching accounting that would address these processes of accounting development and institutionalization.

会计实践的文化领域:制度化和超越组织的会计变化
在过去的二十年里,人们对会计制度化的研究兴趣明显上升。这项工作的大部分都被法规和专业规范所占据,通常是在个别公司的环境中。然而,在会计创新和转型过程中,企业、监管机构和专业组织之外的社会空间,即制度领域,是重要的。本文通过发展会计实践文化领域的概念来引起人们对这些社会空间的关注,这是一种迄今为止在会计文献中相对被忽视的制度领域层面的分析。在发展这一概念的过程中,我们概述了我们如何定义和表征文化领域,强调它们的文化认知特征、缺乏正式治理、分散以及它们可以居住的不同社会空间(从有限的技术领域到全球“世界文化”Meyer,2009;Lechner和Boli,2005年)。我们的术语“文化领域”既指更广泛的领域层面的过程,而这些过程并没有被对专业规范和国家法规的关注所捕捉,也指文化领域层面过程的“文化认知”特征,我们认为这些特征值得在会计研究中进行更广泛的考虑。我们确定了会计实践文化领域的三个联系特征:会计文化生产的分散场所;多样化、多变和混杂的逻辑;以及品味仲裁者和“最佳实践”载体的作用。我们利用这些关键特征来讨论并提供研究会计的例子,以解决会计发展和制度化的这些过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting, Organizations & Society is a major international journal concerned with all aspects of the relationship between accounting and human behaviour, organizational structures and processes, and the changing social and political environment of the enterprise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信