{"title":"Decolonisation: More Than a Trendy Word","authors":"L. Muller","doi":"10.1080/0312407X.2023.2193168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decolonisation has become a fashionable word. A jingoistic mantra repeated because it sounds grand, and one that can be misused and distorted to further colonise and strengthen colonisation. Trendy words occur in academic writing, commonly used, yet rarely defined, and embraced without being fully understood. Words like “decolonisation” have been appropriated, taken from legitimate scholars and used as a metaphor by “experts” in positions of power to further reinforce the colonialist social structures, intellectual agendas, and workspaces (Tuck & Yang, 2012). In my view, blithely or intentionally, academic articles, research funding applications, and media rhetoric can sometimes be scripted using trendy key words to progress agendas that on the surface looks reasonable, yet do not reflect the intent of words used. Decolonisation is one such word. The intention in writing this short commentary is to promote interest in further reading about, and respectful use of the word and movement that is “Decolonisation”.","PeriodicalId":47275,"journal":{"name":"Australian Social Work","volume":"76 1","pages":"295 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2023.2193168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Decolonisation has become a fashionable word. A jingoistic mantra repeated because it sounds grand, and one that can be misused and distorted to further colonise and strengthen colonisation. Trendy words occur in academic writing, commonly used, yet rarely defined, and embraced without being fully understood. Words like “decolonisation” have been appropriated, taken from legitimate scholars and used as a metaphor by “experts” in positions of power to further reinforce the colonialist social structures, intellectual agendas, and workspaces (Tuck & Yang, 2012). In my view, blithely or intentionally, academic articles, research funding applications, and media rhetoric can sometimes be scripted using trendy key words to progress agendas that on the surface looks reasonable, yet do not reflect the intent of words used. Decolonisation is one such word. The intention in writing this short commentary is to promote interest in further reading about, and respectful use of the word and movement that is “Decolonisation”.
期刊介绍:
Australian Social Work is an international peer-reviewed journal reflecting current thinking and trends in Social Work. The Journal promotes the development of practice, policy and education, and publishes original research, theoretical papers and critical reviews that build on existing knowledge. The Journal also publishes reviews of relevant professional literature, commentary and analysis of social policies and encourages debate in the form of reader commentary on articles. Australian Social Work has grown out of the Australian context and continues to provide a vehicle for Australian and international authors. The Journal invites submission of papers from authors worldwide and all contributors are encouraged to present their work for an international readership.