Where service recovery meets its paradox: implications for avoiding overcompensation

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Andreas Edström, Beatrice Nylander, Jonas Molin, Zahra Ahmadi, Patrik Sörqvist
{"title":"Where service recovery meets its paradox: implications for avoiding overcompensation","authors":"Andreas Edström, Beatrice Nylander, Jonas Molin, Zahra Ahmadi, Patrik Sörqvist","doi":"10.1108/jstp-06-2021-0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe service recovery paradox (SRP) is the phenomenon that happens when customer satisfaction level post-service failure and recovery surpasses the customer satisfaction level achieved at error-free service. The aim of this study was to identify how large the size of compensation has to be at recovery for customer satisfaction to surpass that of error-free service (i.e. to identify a threshold value for SRP). The purpose of this is to inform managers how to restore customer satisfaction yet avoid overcompensation.Design/methodology/approachThe paper covers two studies. Study 1 used the novel approach of asking participants who had experienced a service failure in the hotel industry what amount of money (recovery) would make them more satisfied than in the case of error-free service. Study 2 then tested the compensation levels expressed by Study 1 participants to be sufficient for the service recovery paradox to occur.FindingsStudy 1 indicated that the threshold for the SRP was (on average) around 1,204 SEK, or just over 80% of the original room reservation price of 1,500 SEK (approx. $180). Study 2 found that (on average) the customer satisfaction of participants who received 1,204 SEK in compensation for service failure marked the point where it surpassed that of error-free service. Participants who received 633 SEK were less satisfied; participants who received 1,774 SEK were more satisfied.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are context-specific. Future research should test the findings' generalizability.Practical implicationsThe approach used in this paper could provide managers with a tool to guide their service recovery efforts. The findings could help hotel managers to make strategic decisions to restore customer satisfaction yet avoid overcompensation, given a legitimate service failure in which the organization is at fault.Originality/valueNumerous previous studies have investigated the occurrence or absence of the SRP at predetermined compensation levels. This paper used a novel approach to find a quantitative threshold at which the magnitude of the recovery effort makes customer satisfaction surpass that of error-free service.","PeriodicalId":47021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-06-2021-0120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThe service recovery paradox (SRP) is the phenomenon that happens when customer satisfaction level post-service failure and recovery surpasses the customer satisfaction level achieved at error-free service. The aim of this study was to identify how large the size of compensation has to be at recovery for customer satisfaction to surpass that of error-free service (i.e. to identify a threshold value for SRP). The purpose of this is to inform managers how to restore customer satisfaction yet avoid overcompensation.Design/methodology/approachThe paper covers two studies. Study 1 used the novel approach of asking participants who had experienced a service failure in the hotel industry what amount of money (recovery) would make them more satisfied than in the case of error-free service. Study 2 then tested the compensation levels expressed by Study 1 participants to be sufficient for the service recovery paradox to occur.FindingsStudy 1 indicated that the threshold for the SRP was (on average) around 1,204 SEK, or just over 80% of the original room reservation price of 1,500 SEK (approx. $180). Study 2 found that (on average) the customer satisfaction of participants who received 1,204 SEK in compensation for service failure marked the point where it surpassed that of error-free service. Participants who received 633 SEK were less satisfied; participants who received 1,774 SEK were more satisfied.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are context-specific. Future research should test the findings' generalizability.Practical implicationsThe approach used in this paper could provide managers with a tool to guide their service recovery efforts. The findings could help hotel managers to make strategic decisions to restore customer satisfaction yet avoid overcompensation, given a legitimate service failure in which the organization is at fault.Originality/valueNumerous previous studies have investigated the occurrence or absence of the SRP at predetermined compensation levels. This paper used a novel approach to find a quantitative threshold at which the magnitude of the recovery effort makes customer satisfaction surpass that of error-free service.
服务恢复在哪里遇到了它的悖论:避免过度补偿的含义
服务恢复悖论(service recovery paradox,简称SRP)是指服务失败和恢复后的顾客满意度水平超过无差错服务时的顾客满意度水平。本研究的目的是确定补偿的规模有多大,以恢复客户满意度超过无错误的服务(即确定SRP的阈值)。这样做的目的是告诉管理者如何在恢复顾客满意度的同时避免过度补偿。设计/方法/方法这篇论文包括两项研究。研究1采用了一种新颖的方法,询问在酒店行业中经历过服务失败的参与者,与没有错误的服务相比,多少钱(恢复)会让他们更满意。然后,研究2测试了研究1参与者表达的补偿水平是否足以使服务恢复悖论发生。研究1表明,SRP的阈值(平均)约为1204瑞典克朗,或刚刚超过原房间预订价格1500瑞典克朗(约为1000美元)的80%。180美元)。研究2发现,(平均而言)获得1204瑞典克朗的服务失败补偿的参与者的客户满意度标志着它超过了没有错误的服务。获得633瑞典克朗的参与者满意度较低;获得1774瑞典克朗的参与者更满意。研究局限性/意义研究结果是根据具体情况而定的。未来的研究应该检验这些发现的普遍性。实际意义本文所采用的方法可以为管理者提供一种工具来指导他们的服务恢复工作。研究结果可以帮助酒店管理者做出战略决策,以恢复顾客满意度,同时避免过度补偿,因为服务失败是组织的过错。许多先前的研究已经调查了在预定的薪酬水平上是否存在SRP。本文采用了一种新颖的方法来找到一个定量阈值,在这个阈值下,恢复努力的幅度使客户满意度超过无差错服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
15.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Managing Service Quality – Impact Factor: 1.286 (2015) – the Journal of Service Theory and Practice (JSTP) aims to publish research in the field of service management that not only makes a theoretical contribution to the service literature, but also scrutinizes and helps improve industry practices by offering specific recommendations and action plans to practitioners. Recognizing the importance of the service sector across the globe, the journal encourages submissions from and/or studying issues from around the world. JSTP gives prominence to research based on real world data, be it quantitative or qualitative. The journal also encourages the submission of strong conceptual and theoretical papers that make a substantive contribution to the scholarly literature in service management. JSTP publishes double-blind peer reviewed papers and encourages submissions from both academics and practitioners. The changing social structures and values, as well as new developments in economic, political, and technological fields are creating sea-changes in the philosophy, strategic aims, operational practices, and structures of many organizations. These changes are particularly relevant to the service sector, as public demand for high standards increases, and organizations fight for both market share and public credibility. The journal specifically addresses solutions to these challenges from a global, multi-cultural, and multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信