A Multisite Randomized Study of an Online Learning Approach to High School Credit Recovery: Effects on Student Experiences and Proximal Outcomes

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Rickles, M. Clements, Iliana Brodziak de los Reyes, Mark Lachowicz, Shuqiong Lin, Jessica B. Heppen
{"title":"A Multisite Randomized Study of an Online Learning Approach to High School Credit Recovery: Effects on Student Experiences and Proximal Outcomes","authors":"J. Rickles, M. Clements, Iliana Brodziak de los Reyes, Mark Lachowicz, Shuqiong Lin, Jessica B. Heppen","doi":"10.1080/19345747.2023.2198524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online credit recovery will likely expand in the coming years as school districts try to address increased course failure rates brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. Some researchers and policymakers, however, raise concerns over how much students learn in online courses, and there is limited evidence about the effectiveness of online credit recovery. This article presents findings from a multisite randomized study, conducted prior to the pandemic, to expand the field's understanding of online credit recovery's effectiveness. Within 24 high schools from a large urban district, the study randomly assigned 1,683 students who failed Algebra 1 or ninth grade English to a summer credit recovery class that either used an online curriculum with in-class teacher support or the school's business-as-usual teacher-directed class. The results suggest that online credit recovery had relatively insignificant effects on student course experiences and content knowledge, but significantly lower credit recovery rates for English. There was limited heterogeneity in effects across students and schools. Non-response on the study-administered student survey and test limit our confidence in the student experience and content knowledge results, but the findings are robust to different approaches to handling the missing data (multiple imputation or listwise deletion). We discuss how the findings add to the evidence base about online credit recovery and the implications for future research. © 2023 American Institutes for Research. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.","PeriodicalId":47260,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2023.2198524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Online credit recovery will likely expand in the coming years as school districts try to address increased course failure rates brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. Some researchers and policymakers, however, raise concerns over how much students learn in online courses, and there is limited evidence about the effectiveness of online credit recovery. This article presents findings from a multisite randomized study, conducted prior to the pandemic, to expand the field's understanding of online credit recovery's effectiveness. Within 24 high schools from a large urban district, the study randomly assigned 1,683 students who failed Algebra 1 or ninth grade English to a summer credit recovery class that either used an online curriculum with in-class teacher support or the school's business-as-usual teacher-directed class. The results suggest that online credit recovery had relatively insignificant effects on student course experiences and content knowledge, but significantly lower credit recovery rates for English. There was limited heterogeneity in effects across students and schools. Non-response on the study-administered student survey and test limit our confidence in the student experience and content knowledge results, but the findings are robust to different approaches to handling the missing data (multiple imputation or listwise deletion). We discuss how the findings add to the evidence base about online credit recovery and the implications for future research. © 2023 American Institutes for Research. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
在线学习方法对高中学分恢复的多站点随机研究:对学生体验和最近结果的影响
随着各学区试图解决冠状病毒大流行带来的课程不合格率上升的问题,未来几年在线学分恢复可能会扩大。然而,一些研究人员和政策制定者对学生在在线课程中学到了多少知识表示担忧,而且关于在线学分恢复的有效性的证据有限。本文介绍了在大流行之前进行的一项多地点随机研究的结果,以扩大该领域对在线信用恢复有效性的理解。在一个大城市区的24所高中中,这项研究随机分配了1683名代数1或九年级英语不及格的学生参加一个暑期学分恢复班,这个班要么使用在线课程,要么使用课堂老师的支持,要么使用学校的常规教师指导班。结果表明,网络学分恢复对学生课程体验和内容知识的影响相对不显著,但对英语的学分恢复率显著降低。在学生和学校之间,影响的异质性有限。对研究管理的学生调查和测试的无反应限制了我们对学生体验和内容知识结果的信心,但研究结果对于处理缺失数据的不同方法(多重输入或列表删除)是稳健的。我们讨论了这些发现如何增加了关于在线信用恢复的证据基础以及对未来研究的影响。©2023美国研究所。由Taylor & Francis Group, LLC授权出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: As the flagship publication for the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, the Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (JREE) publishes original articles from the multidisciplinary community of researchers who are committed to applying principles of scientific inquiry to the study of educational problems. Articles published in JREE should advance our knowledge of factors important for educational success and/or improve our ability to conduct further disciplined studies of pressing educational problems. JREE welcomes manuscripts that fit into one of the following categories: (1) intervention, evaluation, and policy studies; (2) theory, contexts, and mechanisms; and (3) methodological studies. The first category includes studies that focus on process and implementation and seek to demonstrate causal claims in educational research. The second category includes meta-analyses and syntheses, descriptive studies that illuminate educational conditions and contexts, and studies that rigorously investigate education processes and mechanism. The third category includes studies that advance our understanding of theoretical and technical features of measurement and research design and describe advances in data analysis and data modeling. To establish a stronger connection between scientific evidence and educational practice, studies submitted to JREE should focus on pressing problems found in classrooms and schools. Studies that help advance our understanding and demonstrate effectiveness related to challenges in reading, mathematics education, and science education are especially welcome as are studies related to cognitive functions, social processes, organizational factors, and cultural features that mediate and/or moderate critical educational outcomes. On occasion, invited responses to JREE articles and rejoinders to those responses will be included in an issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信