EDITORIAL

Q2 Social Sciences
Barbara Ross Wooldridge
{"title":"EDITORIAL","authors":"Barbara Ross Wooldridge","doi":"10.1080/10528008.2021.2005750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As I sat at my computer 3 years ago to compose my first letter from the editor, my term seemed to stretch far into the future with 12 issues over 3 years, yet it now seems to be over in a blink of an eye. I thought the hardest decision as editor was accepting or rejecting papers until I had to make the final decision for the next editor. MER was fortunate to have three excellent finalists for the position; I wish all three could have been chosen. The new editor of MER for the next 3 years starting January 1, 2022, is Dr Seung Hwan (Mark) Lee. He is a professor at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada. He has regularly published in Marketing Education Review, including MER’s Article of the year Award (2014), MER’s Best Reviewer of the Year Award (2015) and has been an Editorial Board member since 2016. Dr Lee recently was awarded the 2019 Axcess-Capon Distinguished Teaching Award by Society of Marketing Advances (SMA) for his pedagogical contributions. In addition, he has been a recipient of two university-wide teaching awards from Colorado State University and Western University. I look forward to working with him as a reviewer as I return to the editorial reviewer board as a reviewer. Being the editor of MER has truly been a privilege, I had the opportunity to read hundreds of papers on different aspects of marketing education; some were published, some were not, but all had value and made me a better educator having read them. I will miss interacting with all the ERB members. Your willingness to take time out of very hectic lives to review and help authors shape their papers to become successful is remarkable. I learned so much reading your reviews. Given that almost 2 years of my editorship happened during a pandemic when all of us were challenged and stretched in ways we never imagined, yet you reviewed – awes me. I am a believer that many hands make light work, so if you have suggestions for reviewers or ERB members please send them to Mark; I make no promises, but I do know he will consider and review them. Welcome to the Winter Volume of the Special Issue on Covid-19, and Its Impact on Marketing Education. Due to the overwhelming response to the call the issue was split into two volumes (fall and winter). The winter volume the papers have several logical groupings. Our first group of four papers explores the different methods used to facilitate learning during the pandemic and the transition from one modality to others. Vander Schee and Birrittella offer insights into being more efficient online in managing students with less resources by employing group projects, peer grading, and group grading. The authors evaluated the peer grading and group grades against instructors’ grades in preCovid-19 and post-Covid-19 courses online. Results show no significance difference in grades. Additionally, students perceive the peer group grading as fair. Ackerman and Gross discuss using synchronous online discussion boards as the primary mode of instruction for an undergraduate marketing strategy course. The authors cite literature that shows online discussion boards have been shown to produce desired learning outcomes. The authors discuss the use of synchronous and asynchronous discussion boards and conclude with tips for success with use of synchronous discussion boards. Mitchell, Anderson, Laverie, and Hass were motivated by the abrupt change to online education to explore and learn from a students’ perspective what worked or did not work. Using a phronetic, iterative approach, 110 student reflections from three different marketing courses which transitioned online in the lockdown were analyzed. The data reveal the use of synchronous video-conference platforms enables studentcentered practices can increase social presence and enhance students’ motivation, engagement, and perceived learning. The authors developed a continuum between transactional distance and social presence where student-centered dimensions can be influenced by faculty practices. To assist faculty in increasing social presence in the online delivery of marketing education they developed a set of propositions. Milovic and Dingus focus on discussion boards as well but with a twist as they propose video-based discussions in addition to the traditional online format. Findings from two studies support that the video-based discussions enhance learning outcomes and foster a sense of classroom community. The authors believe digital discussion boards seem to replicate the benefits of the social interaction of a physical classroom. Milovic MARKETING EDUCATION REVIEW 2021, VOL. 31, NO. 4, 273–274 https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2021.2005750","PeriodicalId":37208,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Education Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"273 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2021.2005750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As I sat at my computer 3 years ago to compose my first letter from the editor, my term seemed to stretch far into the future with 12 issues over 3 years, yet it now seems to be over in a blink of an eye. I thought the hardest decision as editor was accepting or rejecting papers until I had to make the final decision for the next editor. MER was fortunate to have three excellent finalists for the position; I wish all three could have been chosen. The new editor of MER for the next 3 years starting January 1, 2022, is Dr Seung Hwan (Mark) Lee. He is a professor at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada. He has regularly published in Marketing Education Review, including MER’s Article of the year Award (2014), MER’s Best Reviewer of the Year Award (2015) and has been an Editorial Board member since 2016. Dr Lee recently was awarded the 2019 Axcess-Capon Distinguished Teaching Award by Society of Marketing Advances (SMA) for his pedagogical contributions. In addition, he has been a recipient of two university-wide teaching awards from Colorado State University and Western University. I look forward to working with him as a reviewer as I return to the editorial reviewer board as a reviewer. Being the editor of MER has truly been a privilege, I had the opportunity to read hundreds of papers on different aspects of marketing education; some were published, some were not, but all had value and made me a better educator having read them. I will miss interacting with all the ERB members. Your willingness to take time out of very hectic lives to review and help authors shape their papers to become successful is remarkable. I learned so much reading your reviews. Given that almost 2 years of my editorship happened during a pandemic when all of us were challenged and stretched in ways we never imagined, yet you reviewed – awes me. I am a believer that many hands make light work, so if you have suggestions for reviewers or ERB members please send them to Mark; I make no promises, but I do know he will consider and review them. Welcome to the Winter Volume of the Special Issue on Covid-19, and Its Impact on Marketing Education. Due to the overwhelming response to the call the issue was split into two volumes (fall and winter). The winter volume the papers have several logical groupings. Our first group of four papers explores the different methods used to facilitate learning during the pandemic and the transition from one modality to others. Vander Schee and Birrittella offer insights into being more efficient online in managing students with less resources by employing group projects, peer grading, and group grading. The authors evaluated the peer grading and group grades against instructors’ grades in preCovid-19 and post-Covid-19 courses online. Results show no significance difference in grades. Additionally, students perceive the peer group grading as fair. Ackerman and Gross discuss using synchronous online discussion boards as the primary mode of instruction for an undergraduate marketing strategy course. The authors cite literature that shows online discussion boards have been shown to produce desired learning outcomes. The authors discuss the use of synchronous and asynchronous discussion boards and conclude with tips for success with use of synchronous discussion boards. Mitchell, Anderson, Laverie, and Hass were motivated by the abrupt change to online education to explore and learn from a students’ perspective what worked or did not work. Using a phronetic, iterative approach, 110 student reflections from three different marketing courses which transitioned online in the lockdown were analyzed. The data reveal the use of synchronous video-conference platforms enables studentcentered practices can increase social presence and enhance students’ motivation, engagement, and perceived learning. The authors developed a continuum between transactional distance and social presence where student-centered dimensions can be influenced by faculty practices. To assist faculty in increasing social presence in the online delivery of marketing education they developed a set of propositions. Milovic and Dingus focus on discussion boards as well but with a twist as they propose video-based discussions in addition to the traditional online format. Findings from two studies support that the video-based discussions enhance learning outcomes and foster a sense of classroom community. The authors believe digital discussion boards seem to replicate the benefits of the social interaction of a physical classroom. Milovic MARKETING EDUCATION REVIEW 2021, VOL. 31, NO. 4, 273–274 https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2021.2005750
编辑
三年前,当我坐在电脑前写编辑的第一封信时,我的任期似乎延伸到了遥远的未来,三年内有12期,但现在似乎一眨眼就结束了。作为编辑,我认为最艰难的决定是接受还是拒绝论文,直到我不得不为下一任编辑做出最终决定。MER很幸运有三名优秀的入围者;我希望这三个人都能被选中。从2022年1月1日起,MER未来3年的新任编辑是Seung Hwan(Mark)Lee博士。他是加拿大多伦多瑞尔森大学的教授。他定期在《营销教育评论》上发表文章,包括MER年度文章奖(2014年)、MER年度最佳评论家奖(2015年),自2016年以来一直担任编委会成员。李博士最近因其在教学方面的贡献被营销进步学会(SMA)授予2019年Axcess Capon杰出教学奖。此外,他还获得了科罗拉多州立大学和西部大学颁发的两项全大学教学奖。我期待着在回到编辑评审委员会担任评审员时,以评审员的身份与他合作。作为MER的编辑真的是一种荣幸,我有机会阅读了数百篇关于营销教育不同方面的论文;有些出版了,有些没有,但都有价值,读过这些书后,我成为了一个更好的教育者。我会怀念与再培训局全体成员的互动。你愿意从繁忙的生活中抽出时间来回顾并帮助作者塑造他们的论文以取得成功,这是非常了不起的。我从你的评论中学到了很多。鉴于我担任编辑近2年的时间发生在一场疫情期间,当时我们所有人都面临着前所未有的挑战和压力,但你评论了——我很敬畏。我相信很多人都能轻松工作,所以如果你对评论人或ERB成员有建议,请将其发送给Mark;我没有做出任何承诺,但我知道他会考虑并审查这些承诺。欢迎收看新冠肺炎及其对营销教育的影响特刊冬季卷。由于该呼吁得到了压倒性的回应,该问题被分为两卷(秋季和冬季)。冬季卷的论文有几个逻辑分组。我们的第一组四篇论文探讨了在疫情期间用于促进学习的不同方法,以及从一种模式向另一种模式的过渡。Vander Schee和Birrittella通过小组项目、同伴评分和小组评分,提供了更高效的在线管理学生的见解。作者根据新冠肺炎前和新冠肺炎后在线课程中教师的成绩评估了同伴评分和小组评分。结果显示,年级之间没有显著差异。此外,学生们认为同龄人的评分是公平的。Ackerman和Gross讨论了将同步在线讨论板作为本科生营销策略课程的主要教学模式。作者引用的文献表明,在线讨论板已被证明能产生预期的学习结果。作者讨论了同步和异步讨论板的使用,并总结了使用同步讨论板的成功技巧。Mitchell、Anderson、Laverie和Hass受到在线教育突然转变的激励,从学生的角度探索和学习什么有效或无效。使用一种虚拟的迭代方法,分析了110名学生对三门不同营销课程的反思,这三门课程在封锁期间过渡到了网上。数据显示,同步视频会议平台的使用使以学生为中心的实践能够增加社交影响力,增强学生的动机、参与度和感知学习。作者在交易距离和社交存在之间建立了一个连续体,其中以学生为中心的维度可能会受到教师实践的影响。为了帮助教师在在线营销教育中增加社会影响力,他们制定了一套主张。Milovic和Dingus也专注于讨论板,但除了传统的在线形式外,他们还提出了基于视频的讨论。两项研究的结果支持基于视频的讨论可以提高学习成果并培养课堂社区意识。作者认为,数字讨论板似乎复制了物理课堂社交互动的好处。Milovic营销教育评论2021,第31卷,第4期,273–274https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2021.2005750
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marketing Education Review
Marketing Education Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书