Application of selected components of “SPICES” model as teaching-learning method in pharmacology

IF 0.9 4区医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.3329/bjp.v16i4.55620

Mohosina Sultana Setu, M. Rahman

{"title":"Application of selected components of “SPICES” model as teaching-learning method in pharmacology","authors":"Mohosina Sultana Setu, M. Rahman","doi":"10.3329/bjp.v16i4.55620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was to compare the performance of the students (future pres-cribers) of four medical colleges using three modules on rational prescribing. Marks obtained (out of 35) in ‘student-centered learning’ approach in first and second assessment were 28.3 ± 3.4 and 23.7 ± 4.2 respectively, which is significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control (12.9 ± 6.4 and 10.0 ± 6.1). Marks obtained (out of 40) in ‘problem-based learning’ approach in first and second assessment were 38.2 ± 1.5 and 32.0 ± 2.4 respectively, which is significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control (23.2 ± 3.8 and 22.7 ± 2.4). Marks obtained (out of 40) in ‘integrated learning’ approach in first and second assessment were 32.0 ± 1.8 and 28.8 ± 2.0 respectively, which is significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control (20.9 ± 2.09 and 14.3 ± 3.7). Though the marks obtained in control and all three intervention groups in first assessment was significantly (p<0.05) reduced in the second assessment. Thus, student-centered, problem based and integrated learning approaches are more effective than traditional method. ","PeriodicalId":8719,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v16i4.55620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was to compare the performance of the students (future pres-cribers) of four medical colleges using three modules on rational prescribing. Marks obtained (out of 35) in ‘student-centered learning’ approach in first and second assessment were 28.3 ± 3.4 and 23.7 ± 4.2 respectively, which is significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control (12.9 ± 6.4 and 10.0 ± 6.1). Marks obtained (out of 40) in ‘problem-based learning’ approach in first and second assessment were 38.2 ± 1.5 and 32.0 ± 2.4 respectively, which is significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control (23.2 ± 3.8 and 22.7 ± 2.4). Marks obtained (out of 40) in ‘integrated learning’ approach in first and second assessment were 32.0 ± 1.8 and 28.8 ± 2.0 respectively, which is significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control (20.9 ± 2.09 and 14.3 ± 3.7). Though the marks obtained in control and all three intervention groups in first assessment was significantly (p<0.05) reduced in the second assessment. Thus, student-centered, problem based and integrated learning approaches are more effective than traditional method.

查看原文本刊更多论文

“香料”模型在药理学教学中的应用

本研究旨在比较四所医学院学生(未来开处方者)运用三个合理处方模块的表现。“以学生为中心”方法在第一次和第二次评价中的得分分别为28.3±3.4分和23.7±4.2分，显著高于对照组(12.9±6.4分和10.0±6.1分)(p<0.01)。“基于问题的学习”方法在第一次和第二次评估中的得分(总分40分)分别为38.2±1.5分和32.0±2.4分，显著高于对照组的23.2±3.8分和22.7±2.4分(p<0.01)。综合学习方法在第一次和第二次评估中的得分(总分40分)分别为32.0±1.8分和28.8±2.0分，显著高于对照组(20.9±2.09分和14.3±3.7分)(p<0.01)。对照组和三个干预组在第一次评估时得分明显低于第二次评估(p<0.05)。因此，以学生为中心，以问题为基础的综合学习方法比传统方法更有效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

18.80%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology (Bangladesh J Pharmacol) is an open access, video component, peer-reviewed journal of the Bangladesh Pharmacological Society (BDPS). A scholarly publication is defined ''open access'' when there are no financial, legal or technical barriers to accessing it. Anyone can read, download, copy, distribute, print or use it in educational purpose within the legal agreements. Peer review of a manuscript means the evaluation of research work by one or more people with similar competences. It can be open or blind. We do the single-blind peer review. Our readers want to know the methodology used by the researchers which is very important to get the results. The video clip of one of the methodologies is prepared by the authors and submit it to publish.