Introduction

Q4 Social Sciences
J. Fu, A. Reddy
{"title":"Introduction","authors":"J. Fu, A. Reddy","doi":"10.1080/02681307.2022.2030964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Reattachment of fractured tooth fragment is the contemporary minimal intervention concept. Aim: To compare the fracture resistance of three reattachment techniques in fractured endodontically treated incisors. Materials and Methods: Eighty maxillary central incisors were divided into four groups (n=20 each), where group A samples served as control. Remaining (n=60) crowns were sectioned experimentally, and after root canal treatment, in group B reattachment was done by placing palatal grooves and overcontouring. In group C, teeth were reattached by placing glass fiber posts and in group D, titanium posts were used. After thermocycling, fracture resistance evaluation was done by using universal testing machine and mode of failure was analysed under stereomicroscope. Statistical Analysis: The force required to fracture the tooth recorded in newtons was subjected to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple post-hoc test with a level of significance ᾳ=0.05. Results: Reattachment with titanium post reinforcement has shown higher fracture resistance, whereas palatal grooves with overcontouring has exhibited lowest resistance to fracture (p=< 0.05). Most of the favourable fractures occurred in the fiber post group. Conclusion: Reinforcement with titanium posts can significantly improve the fracture strength of reattached teeth and results in a favourable fracture mode.","PeriodicalId":37791,"journal":{"name":"Whitehall Papers","volume":"100 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whitehall Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02681307.2022.2030964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Reattachment of fractured tooth fragment is the contemporary minimal intervention concept. Aim: To compare the fracture resistance of three reattachment techniques in fractured endodontically treated incisors. Materials and Methods: Eighty maxillary central incisors were divided into four groups (n=20 each), where group A samples served as control. Remaining (n=60) crowns were sectioned experimentally, and after root canal treatment, in group B reattachment was done by placing palatal grooves and overcontouring. In group C, teeth were reattached by placing glass fiber posts and in group D, titanium posts were used. After thermocycling, fracture resistance evaluation was done by using universal testing machine and mode of failure was analysed under stereomicroscope. Statistical Analysis: The force required to fracture the tooth recorded in newtons was subjected to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple post-hoc test with a level of significance ᾳ=0.05. Results: Reattachment with titanium post reinforcement has shown higher fracture resistance, whereas palatal grooves with overcontouring has exhibited lowest resistance to fracture (p=< 0.05). Most of the favourable fractures occurred in the fiber post group. Conclusion: Reinforcement with titanium posts can significantly improve the fracture strength of reattached teeth and results in a favourable fracture mode.
介绍
简介:牙块断裂再附着是当代最小干预的概念。目的:比较三种牙根管治疗门牙骨折后再附着体的抗骨折性。材料与方法:80例上颌中切牙分为4组,每组20例,其中A组为对照组。实验将剩余的60个冠切开,B组在根管治疗后,通过放置腭槽和过度轮廓进行再附着。C组采用玻璃纤维桩再植,D组采用钛桩再植。热循环后,用万能试验机对其进行抗断裂性评价,并用体视显微镜对其失效模式进行分析。统计分析:以牛顿为单位记录的牙齿断裂所需的力采用单因素方差分析和Tukey多重事后检验进行统计分析,显著性水平为ε =0.05。结果:钛桩加固再附着具有较高的抗骨折性,而过度轮廓腭槽的抗骨折性最低(p=< 0.05)。多数有利骨折发生在纤维桩组。结论:钛桩加固可显著提高再植牙的断裂强度,形成良好的断裂模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Whitehall Papers
Whitehall Papers Social Sciences-Archeology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Whitehall Paper series provides in-depth studies of specific developments, issues or themes in the field of national and international defence and security. Published three times a year, Whitehall Papers reflect the highest standards of original research and analysis, and are invaluable background material for policy-makers and specialists alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信