Thermal inactivation kinetics of seven genera of vegetative bacterial pathogens common to the food chain are similar after adjusting for effects of water activity, sugar content and pH

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. Hein M. van Lieverloo , Mounia Bijlaart , Marjon H.J. Wells-Bennik , Heidy M.W. Den Besten , Marcel H. Zwietering
{"title":"Thermal inactivation kinetics of seven genera of vegetative bacterial pathogens common to the food chain are similar after adjusting for effects of water activity, sugar content and pH","authors":"J. Hein M. van Lieverloo ,&nbsp;Mounia Bijlaart ,&nbsp;Marjon H.J. Wells-Bennik ,&nbsp;Heidy M.W. Den Besten ,&nbsp;Marcel H. Zwietering","doi":"10.1016/j.mran.2021.100174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A predictive model was made for the logarithm of the thermal decimal reduction time (logD) of <em>Salmonella enterica</em> (<em>D</em> = time to 90% reduction by inactivation). The model was fitted with multiple linear regression from 521 logD-values reported in literature for laboratory media and foods highly varying in water activity and pH. The single regression model with temperature as the only variable had a high residual standard error (RSE) of 0.883 logD and no predictive value (fraction of variance explained (R<sup>2</sup>) &lt; 0.001). Adding water activity, sugar content and pH as predictors resulted in a model with a lower RSE of 0.458 logD and an adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.73. The model was validated by comparing 985 predicted with observed logD for <em>S. enterica</em> from other publications. The model was subsequently validated with 1498 published logD-values for inactivation of vegetative cells of nine other pathogenic bacteria genera (mainly <em>Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Cronobacter</em> spp., <em>Staphylococcus aureus, Yersinia enterocolitica</em>) in or on a variety of laboratory media, meat, fish, dairy, nuts, fruits and vegetables. Regression analyses for validation with the 985 logD of <em>S. enterica</em> and 2483 logD of all genera show deviations from the expected slope of 1 (both 0.81) and the expected intercept of 0 (0.04 and 0.19 logD respectively). However, only 0.7% and 2% respectively of the new logD (expected: 0.5%) were observed above the 99% prediction interval of the original <em>S. enterica</em> model based on 521 logD. The findings suggest that i) the variability of thermal resistance of strains within species is larger than between genera and species; ii) one generic predictive model, also accounting for variability, suffices for designing the thermal inactivation of a variety of vegetative pathogenic bacteria in many food types.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48593,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Risk Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mran.2021.100174","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352221000165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A predictive model was made for the logarithm of the thermal decimal reduction time (logD) of Salmonella enterica (D = time to 90% reduction by inactivation). The model was fitted with multiple linear regression from 521 logD-values reported in literature for laboratory media and foods highly varying in water activity and pH. The single regression model with temperature as the only variable had a high residual standard error (RSE) of 0.883 logD and no predictive value (fraction of variance explained (R2) < 0.001). Adding water activity, sugar content and pH as predictors resulted in a model with a lower RSE of 0.458 logD and an adjusted R2 of 0.73. The model was validated by comparing 985 predicted with observed logD for S. enterica from other publications. The model was subsequently validated with 1498 published logD-values for inactivation of vegetative cells of nine other pathogenic bacteria genera (mainly Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Cronobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Yersinia enterocolitica) in or on a variety of laboratory media, meat, fish, dairy, nuts, fruits and vegetables. Regression analyses for validation with the 985 logD of S. enterica and 2483 logD of all genera show deviations from the expected slope of 1 (both 0.81) and the expected intercept of 0 (0.04 and 0.19 logD respectively). However, only 0.7% and 2% respectively of the new logD (expected: 0.5%) were observed above the 99% prediction interval of the original S. enterica model based on 521 logD. The findings suggest that i) the variability of thermal resistance of strains within species is larger than between genera and species; ii) one generic predictive model, also accounting for variability, suffices for designing the thermal inactivation of a variety of vegetative pathogenic bacteria in many food types.

在调整了水活度、糖含量和pH值的影响后,食物链中常见的7属植物性细菌病原体的热失活动力学相似
建立了肠沙门氏菌热十进制还原时间(logD)的对数预测模型(D =灭活至还原90%的时间)。该模型采用文献报道的521个对数d值进行多元线性回归拟合,适用于水活度和ph值高度变化的实验室培养基和食品。以温度为唯一变量的单一回归模型的残差标准误差(RSE)为0.883 logD,没有预测值(方差解释分数(R2) <0.001)。添加水分活度、糖含量和pH作为预测因子,模型的RSE为0.458 logD,调整后的R2为0.73。通过比较预测的985与其他出版物中肠链球菌的观测logD,验证了该模型。该模型随后用1498个已发表的logd值验证了其他九种致病菌属(主要是单核增生李斯特菌、大肠杆菌、产气荚膜梭菌、克罗诺杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌)在各种实验室培养基、肉类、鱼类、乳制品、坚果、水果和蔬菜中的营养细胞失活。以肠链球菌的985 logD和所有属的2483 logD进行回归分析验证,结果显示与预期斜率为1(均为0.81)和预期截距为0(分别为0.04和0.19 logD)的偏差。然而,在基于521 logD的原肠链球菌模型的99%预测区间之上,分别只观察到0.7%和2%的新logD(预期为0.5%)。结果表明:(1)种内菌株的热阻变异性大于属与种之间的热阻变异性;Ii)一个通用的预测模型,也考虑到变异性,足以设计多种食品类型中各种营养致病菌的热灭活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial Risk Analysis
Microbial Risk Analysis Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Risk Analysis accepts articles dealing with the study of risk analysis applied to microbial hazards. Manuscripts should at least cover any of the components of risk assessment (risk characterization, exposure assessment, etc.), risk management and/or risk communication in any microbiology field (clinical, environmental, food, veterinary, etc.). This journal also accepts article dealing with predictive microbiology, quantitative microbial ecology, mathematical modeling, risk studies applied to microbial ecology, quantitative microbiology for epidemiological studies, statistical methods applied to microbiology, and laws and regulatory policies aimed at lessening the risk of microbial hazards. Work focusing on risk studies of viruses, parasites, microbial toxins, antimicrobial resistant organisms, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and recombinant DNA products are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信